5.0 (Ford) VS 5.7 (Chevy) engine question
I have friend that has a 1400 flywheel hp mustang. It is a 345in motor. Before the boost from the blower he made over 520hp to the wheels. Granted he has a $10,000 Motech computer and has spent over $85,000 in the motor but that is very nice N/A hp. <hr></blockquote>
85,000!!!! <img src="gr_eek2.gif" border="0"> <img src="gr_eek2.gif" border="0"> <img src="gr_eek2.gif" border="0"> pro5.0 motor??
in 2002, I ran a 302 with a stock bottom end, unported gt40P heads, an unported edelbrock intake with a 500 lift cam and it put out 425hp to the tires. I ran 11.50's at 3200lbs and I drove the car everyday.
It was an Explorer engine that I changed the cam and intakeand rockers and that was it. Everything else was from the factory
Before I get flamed, keep in mind, I am putting an LS2 in my Mustang.
I couldn't care less if it's a sbf or sbc, as long as I am racing again.
the 302 CI engine is an old platform, but a low ten second car can be had for not much based on it, but really it's been done so much it's kind of boring at this point. IMO.
Even today's factory stock classes don't run that fast and you claim to have little more than what that class runs.
Your combo maybe maybe did 425 at the flywheel and even that would be with some serious "tweaking" of what is hidden under cast iron.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Was there for about 12 years.

I'd bet his listed combo made 260-280rwhp at the very most. The milestone in naturally aspirated 5.0's has always been 300rwhp. Much more than that and the car slowly but surely becomes a dragstrip only car that is pretty ignorant on the street regardless of who tunes it. NA 425rwhp comes with ported aluminum heads, big custom cams, high rpm intakes, 331 or higher cubic inches. OR....tons of HIGH DOLLAR Factory Stock tricks and parts, but even they weren't running 11.50's in 2002...
I ran Pure Street in the NMRA back in 2000, not 2002 and we could not port anything, if you had a carb. and at 3200lbs, it ran 11.50@116 with a 1.35 60ft on 26/10 slicks.
you do the math....
I can reproduce that combination, if you like...
here is exactly what it is...
1989 factory block, factory rods with arp rod bolts and pistons
gt40P heads unported with a valve job and custom valve springs (factory valves were backcut)
custom grind hydraulic roller cam with .499 lift
unported edelbrock performer rpm "air gap" manifold
Holley 650 carb reworked by The Carb Shop
1 inch tapered spacer.
1 5/8 headers, 2.5 inch exhaust
I will give you this... it did have a race set of bearings and a custom ring gap.
this power was to the tires through a McLoed clutch in a t5, 26/10 slicks and 488 gears.
I shifted this engine at 7400rpm
Last edited by Qwiknotch; Jul 8, 2008 at 08:01 PM.
I ran Pure Street in the NMRA back in 2002 and we could not port anything, if you had a carb. and at 3200lbs, it ran 11.50@116 with a 1.35 60ft on 26/10 slicks.
you do the math....
I can reproduce that combination, if you like...
here is exactly what it is...
1989 factory block, factory rods with arp rod bolts and pistons
gt40P heads unported with a valve job and custom valve springs (factory valves were backcut)
custom grind hydraulic roller cam with .499 lift
unported edelbrock performer rpm "air gap" manifold
Holley 650 carb reworked by The Carb Shop
1 inch tapered spacer.
1 5/8 headers, 2.5 inch exhaust
I will give you this... it did have a race set of bearings and a custom ring gap.
this power was to the tires through a McLoed clutch in a t5, 26/10 slicks and 488 gears.
I shifted this engine at 7400rpm
there it is!
had to be the the top secret ring gap and the race bearings
j/k
that's pretty sad because I had my Saleen dynoed at Granatelli's last year for the dyno day with www.socal-racing.com and it made 260hp to the wheels with a completely stock engine. It has a factory long block with a factory cam and I converted it to a carb. It had a Performer RPM air gap and a 650 carb with 1 5/8 headers..
Here is a pic of it on the dyno.. they have a video of it somewhere

here is a pic of me, pointing to all the blow by that pos 160k engine had

here is a pic of the engine in the saleen that made 260hp

and here is pic of the car that had ran 11.50

This is like corral with the pros saying they made 330rwhp with the stock intake and untouched gt40 heads.
We had a factory stock car on the dyno 2-3 years ago and it made right at 312rwhp ("untouched" e7 heads, limited intake choice, "factory" cam)
The guy had $8,000-9,000 in the motor.
<strong>SO it is possible with aggresive ported heads and intake, for a mustang to get anywhere near the power we get? without using a supercharger?</strong><hr></blockquote>
N/A? NOPE. You will never see a 302 dyno 420 rwhp from motor alone. 5.0's are an excellent foundation for going fast with the right parts, but it will definately take a power adder to produce similar RWHP #'s to a well built heads/cam LS1.

This is like corral with the pros saying they made 330rwhp with the stock intake and untouched gt40 heads.
We had a factory stock car on the dyno 2-3 years ago and it made right at 312rwhp ("untouched" e7 heads, limited intake choice, "factory" cam)
The guy had $8,000-9,000 in the motor.
Ok, now add gt40p heads, a custom cam, a dual plane intake and a 650 carb
All I am defending is the fact that 400+hp can be acheived with a 302 and basic heads
you do not need some sick *** non streetable 302 to make 400+
Bill Glidden did an engine for a guy... 308 inches, victor jr heads (ported), victor jr intake, custom hydraulic roller cam and 10:1 compression. That engine made 609hp at the flywheel








