Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.0 (Ford) VS 5.7 (Chevy) engine question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2002, 04:31 PM
  #21  
On The Tree
 
SPRAYN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: stone mtn,ga
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 5.0 (Ford) VS 5.7 (Chevy) engine question

[quote]originally posted by JPls1
I have friend that has a 1400 flywheel hp mustang. It is a 345in motor. Before the boost from the blower he made over 520hp to the wheels. Granted he has a $10,000 Motech computer and has spent over $85,000 in the motor but that is very nice N/A hp. <hr></blockquote>

85,000!!!! <img src="gr_eek2.gif" border="0"> <img src="gr_eek2.gif" border="0"> <img src="gr_eek2.gif" border="0"> pro5.0 motor??
Old 02-16-2002, 05:45 PM
  #22  
Teching In
 
JPLS-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 5.0 (Ford) VS 5.7 (Chevy) engine question

Yes it is. He made 520+ hp before he decided to build the big motor. He is racing in the street outlaw class with 10in. tires. we built a nice set of headers and a 4" x-pipe for it. They wont last long...... his car is gardrail bate.
Old 02-17-2002, 09:50 AM
  #23  
TECH Addict
 
LS1derfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: new england
Posts: 2,298
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: 5.0 (Ford) VS 5.7 (Chevy) engine question

Bottomline, most 5.0 guys are not thinkers, they are followers, who still count their wins over 305 IROCS from racing in the 80's. Well the 80's are over and so are the days of Mustang street supremacy, LONG LIVE LS1! <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
Old 07-07-2008, 12:32 PM
  #24  
TECH Apprentice
 
Qwiknotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Granada Hills, Ca
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default hahahah

Wow, I was searching for something else and came across this thread from 2002. There are some truly uninformed people who have no clue about the 5.0

in 2002, I ran a 302 with a stock bottom end, unported gt40P heads, an unported edelbrock intake with a 500 lift cam and it put out 425hp to the tires. I ran 11.50's at 3200lbs and I drove the car everyday.
It was an Explorer engine that I changed the cam and intakeand rockers and that was it. Everything else was from the factory

Before I get flamed, keep in mind, I am putting an LS2 in my Mustang.

I couldn't care less if it's a sbf or sbc, as long as I am racing again.
Old 07-07-2008, 12:43 PM
  #25  
Teching In
 
joe0121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fredericktown, Ohio
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by chuckhammer
I know we're comparing the power potential of different engines (not cars) here, but keep in mind that a Fox-Body Mustang doesn't need to make quite as much power for identical acceleration (all else being equal, tranny, gears, traction, etc.). It weighs less. <img src="gr_sad.gif" border="0">
Doesn't weigh less than a Corvette... When I was in the Marines and my car was stock I routinely put a hurting on my buddy with a H/C mustang. After the 60' foot mark it was a foot race and a mustang will not do well in a foot race against a C5 corvette with similar mods anyways.

the 302 CI engine is an old platform, but a low ten second car can be had for not much based on it, but really it's been done so much it's kind of boring at this point. IMO.
Old 07-08-2008, 12:00 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
tylercrawford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Qwiknotch
Wow, I was searching for something else and came across this thread from 2002. There are some truly uninformed people who have no clue about the 5.0s
so you follow that with . . .

Originally Posted by Qwiknotch
in 2002, I ran a 302 with a stock bottom end, unported gt40P heads, an unported edelbrock intake with a 500 lift cam and it put out 425hp to the tires.
come on man, I know this is ls1tech so you have a pretty good chance of everyone's knowledge based on hearsay but seriously.

Even today's factory stock classes don't run that fast and you claim to have little more than what that class runs.

Your combo maybe maybe did 425 at the flywheel and even that would be with some serious "tweaking" of what is hidden under cast iron.
Old 07-08-2008, 03:34 AM
  #27  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Dusting the closet?
Old 07-08-2008, 09:31 AM
  #28  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
5_02ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

425 on a stock short block.....maybe on a 150 shot...lol...ive owned too many 5 liters to even think of believing that BS......maybe 325 with a very strong combo
Old 07-08-2008, 09:36 AM
  #29  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
5_02ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

haha i just looked at his combo.....looks like a sub 300rwhp setup to me....my bro inlaws 95 cobra gt40 heads cobra intake b 303 cam and all the supporting bolt ons only made 254 motor and 390 on a wet 150 shot....my buddies tfs headed cars one made 265 and the other with a lil more compression made 275.......all dynojet #s...
Old 07-08-2008, 02:36 PM
  #30  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (43)
 
rel3rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD.
Posts: 2,836
Received 284 Likes on 187 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5_02ls1
425 on a stock short block.....maybe on a 150 shot...lol...ive owned too many 5 liters to even think of believing that BS......maybe 325 with a very strong combo
same here....I came from the other side.
Was there for about 12 years.

I'd bet his listed combo made 260-280rwhp at the very most. The milestone in naturally aspirated 5.0's has always been 300rwhp. Much more than that and the car slowly but surely becomes a dragstrip only car that is pretty ignorant on the street regardless of who tunes it. NA 425rwhp comes with ported aluminum heads, big custom cams, high rpm intakes, 331 or higher cubic inches. OR....tons of HIGH DOLLAR Factory Stock tricks and parts, but even they weren't running 11.50's in 2002...

It was an Explorer engine that I changed the cam and intakeand rockers and that was it. Everything else was from the factory
425rwhp with what you listed above???
Old 07-08-2008, 07:47 PM
  #31  
TECH Apprentice
 
Qwiknotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Granada Hills, Ca
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Believe all you want, guys...

I ran Pure Street in the NMRA back in 2000, not 2002 and we could not port anything, if you had a carb. and at 3200lbs, it ran 11.50@116 with a 1.35 60ft on 26/10 slicks.

you do the math....


I can reproduce that combination, if you like...

here is exactly what it is...

1989 factory block, factory rods with arp rod bolts and pistons
gt40P heads unported with a valve job and custom valve springs (factory valves were backcut)
custom grind hydraulic roller cam with .499 lift
unported edelbrock performer rpm "air gap" manifold
Holley 650 carb reworked by The Carb Shop
1 inch tapered spacer.
1 5/8 headers, 2.5 inch exhaust
I will give you this... it did have a race set of bearings and a custom ring gap.
this power was to the tires through a McLoed clutch in a t5, 26/10 slicks and 488 gears.
I shifted this engine at 7400rpm

Last edited by Qwiknotch; 07-08-2008 at 08:01 PM.
Old 07-08-2008, 08:00 PM
  #32  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Qwiknotch
Believe all you want, guys...

I ran Pure Street in the NMRA back in 2002 and we could not port anything, if you had a carb. and at 3200lbs, it ran 11.50@116 with a 1.35 60ft on 26/10 slicks.

you do the math....


I can reproduce that combination, if you like...

here is exactly what it is...

1989 factory block, factory rods with arp rod bolts and pistons
gt40P heads unported with a valve job and custom valve springs (factory valves were backcut)
custom grind hydraulic roller cam with .499 lift
unported edelbrock performer rpm "air gap" manifold
Holley 650 carb reworked by The Carb Shop
1 inch tapered spacer.
1 5/8 headers, 2.5 inch exhaust
I will give you this... it did have a race set of bearings and a custom ring gap.
this power was to the tires through a McLoed clutch in a t5, 26/10 slicks and 488 gears.
I shifted this engine at 7400rpm
oh dam!
there it is!
had to be the the top secret ring gap and the race bearings
j/k
Old 07-08-2008, 08:00 PM
  #33  
TECH Apprentice
 
Qwiknotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Granada Hills, Ca
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 5_02ls1
haha i just looked at his combo.....looks like a sub 300rwhp setup to me....my bro inlaws 95 cobra gt40 heads cobra intake b 303 cam and all the supporting bolt ons only made 254 motor and 390 on a wet 150 shot....my buddies tfs headed cars one made 265 and the other with a lil more compression made 275.......all dynojet #s...

that's pretty sad because I had my Saleen dynoed at Granatelli's last year for the dyno day with www.socal-racing.com and it made 260hp to the wheels with a completely stock engine. It has a factory long block with a factory cam and I converted it to a carb. It had a Performer RPM air gap and a 650 carb with 1 5/8 headers..

Here is a pic of it on the dyno.. they have a video of it somewhere

here is a pic of me, pointing to all the blow by that pos 160k engine had

here is a pic of the engine in the saleen that made 260hp

and here is pic of the car that had ran 11.50
Old 07-08-2008, 08:04 PM
  #34  
TECH Apprentice
 
Qwiknotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Granada Hills, Ca
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NemeSS
oh dam!
there it is!
had to be the the top secret ring gap and the race bearings
j/k
honestly, it was probably the ring gap and the cam...

I went through 6 cams and picked up 75hp messing around with cam profiles and valve spring rates and ring gap
Old 07-09-2008, 12:54 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
tylercrawford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Qwiknotch
Believe all you want, guys...

I ran Pure Street in the NMRA back in 2000, not 2002 and we could not port anything, if you had a carb. and at 3200lbs, it ran 11.50@116 with a 1.35 60ft on 26/10 slicks.
Do you have a degree in sandbagging?

This is like corral with the pros saying they made 330rwhp with the stock intake and untouched gt40 heads.

We had a factory stock car on the dyno 2-3 years ago and it made right at 312rwhp ("untouched" e7 heads, limited intake choice, "factory" cam)

The guy had $8,000-9,000 in the motor.
Old 07-09-2008, 01:27 AM
  #36  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
b00sted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,109
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

[QUOTE=Damian;441982]
Originally posted by SuperZ28:
<strong>SO it is possible with aggresive ported heads and intake, for a mustang to get anywhere near the power we get? without using a supercharger?</strong><hr></blockquote>


N/A? NOPE. You will never see a 302 dyno 420 rwhp from motor alone. 5.0's are an excellent foundation for going fast with the right parts, but it will definately take a power adder to produce similar RWHP #'s to a well built heads/cam LS1.
So no n/a 302 can make 420 to the wheels? ha.
Old 07-09-2008, 01:33 AM
  #37  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (30)
 
stevied916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

[QUOTE=b00sted;9703011]
Originally Posted by Damian

So no n/a 302 can make 420 to the wheels? ha.
it's pushing it. My friends 302 with 8 lbs made around 440 with a fully built motor
Old 07-09-2008, 01:36 AM
  #38  
TECH Apprentice
 
Qwiknotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Granada Hills, Ca
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tylercrawford
Do you have a degree in sandbagging?

This is like corral with the pros saying they made 330rwhp with the stock intake and untouched gt40 heads.

We had a factory stock car on the dyno 2-3 years ago and it made right at 312rwhp ("untouched" e7 heads, limited intake choice, "factory" cam)

The guy had $8,000-9,000 in the motor.

Ok, now add gt40p heads, a custom cam, a dual plane intake and a 650 carb

All I am defending is the fact that 400+hp can be acheived with a 302 and basic heads
you do not need some sick *** non streetable 302 to make 400+

Bill Glidden did an engine for a guy... 308 inches, victor jr heads (ported), victor jr intake, custom hydraulic roller cam and 10:1 compression. That engine made 609hp at the flywheel
Old 07-09-2008, 02:35 AM
  #39  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
01m6ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dickinson, tx.
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well lets see.. i had a 92 lx with a built 306 w/ old school tfs iron heads fully ported,wolverine 5105 cam, gt-40 lower, w/bread box upper, 30 #'s, BBK LT"s,tremec tko t-5, 4.30 gears and with the rest of the bolt on's mass air, throttle body.. blah blah.. and all she had was 390 to the wheels..n/a..
Old 07-09-2008, 10:20 AM
  #40  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
b00sted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,109
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

[QUOTE=stevied916;9703024]
Originally Posted by b00sted

it's pushing it. My friends 302 with 8 lbs made around 440 with a fully built motor
Than he needs to up the boost.

A stock 5.0 with a small blower/turbo can make more than that FYI.


Quick Reply: 5.0 (Ford) VS 5.7 (Chevy) engine question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 PM.