C2 vs 226 cam?
05-03-2002, 02:59 PM
#1
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Angleton/Lake Jackson (South of Houston)
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C2 vs 226 cam? I was wondering if there would be any difference between the C2 (224/224 581 581 112) or the 226/226 585 585 112? Both cams are on the XE-R. Is there that much of a difference between the 2deg of duration? Does anyone have any other cams I should look into?
TIA
ALbert
TIA
ALbert
05-03-2002, 04:43 PM
#2
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: C2 vs 226 cam? I run a 226/226 575/575 114 FMS cam in an otherwise stock motor.
I dont have dyno results, but at the track I've run several high 117 mph passes and one 118 mph pass. These were all low 11.40 passes too with the best of an 11.40.
Onxyls1 has the c2 cam in his M6 car and has run 11.70@116. You should push around the list http://xs-fx.com/list/ls1tech_list.php
I dont have dyno results, but at the track I've run several high 117 mph passes and one 118 mph pass. These were all low 11.40 passes too with the best of an 11.40.
Onxyls1 has the c2 cam in his M6 car and has run 11.70@116. You should push around the list http://xs-fx.com/list/ls1tech_list.php
05-04-2002, 04:17 AM
#4
D(irecto)r Pepper
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston Raceway Park...in TEXAS.
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: C2 vs 226 cam? </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by VINCE:
<strong>They should produce similar #'s.. The 226 should give me more power if setups are the same..</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">In the right set up... the bigger cam will make more power. But, this will entail running the motor harder (spinning it higher),
At what point is big... too big? the 222/222 makes good power. The 224/224 CAN make more power but it will have to run harder. The 226/226? same scenario, more RPM's, more rear gear, more converter, higher launch to stay out of the bog... etc. At what point do you say OK, "this" is big enough?
There are always trade offs....ALWAYS.
<strong>They should produce similar #'s.. The 226 should give me more power if setups are the same..</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">In the right set up... the bigger cam will make more power. But, this will entail running the motor harder (spinning it higher),
At what point is big... too big? the 222/222 makes good power. The 224/224 CAN make more power but it will have to run harder. The 226/226? same scenario, more RPM's, more rear gear, more converter, higher launch to stay out of the bog... etc. At what point do you say OK, "this" is big enough?
There are always trade offs....ALWAYS.
