G5 vs T1 cam
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: DFW area, tx
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: G5 vs T1 cam
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Bear:
<strong>U will probably need programming w/the G5. Lots of people are making good power w/stock heads. Not a bad choice.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yeah. I've been researching that cam, and it seems most everyone has PCM tuning. But I can easily over look that when I see people putting down 400hp from just a cam, headers and etc.
<strong>U will probably need programming w/the G5. Lots of people are making good power w/stock heads. Not a bad choice.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yeah. I've been researching that cam, and it seems most everyone has PCM tuning. But I can easily over look that when I see people putting down 400hp from just a cam, headers and etc.
#2
D(irecto)r Pepper
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston Raceway Park...in TEXAS.
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: G5 vs T1 cam
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Whatsoil4?:
<strong>Yeah. I've been researching that cam, and it seems most everyone has PCM tuning. But I can easily over look that when I see people putting down 400hp from just a cam, headers and etc.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">But thats been done with cams much smaller than the G5.
For example the T1 and Hammer to name a few.
<strong>Yeah. I've been researching that cam, and it seems most everyone has PCM tuning. But I can easily over look that when I see people putting down 400hp from just a cam, headers and etc.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">But thats been done with cams much smaller than the G5.
For example the T1 and Hammer to name a few.
#3
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: G5 vs T1 cam
224/230 cam vs a 221/221 cam. Not a big difference. I'd just go with the MMS 229v2.1. It pulls better vacuum at idle and makes more power. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
#4
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: G5 vs T1 cam
ever thought about thunders 230/224 cam? granted it hasnt been dyno tested on many cars but it made phenominal power on Jason's car and has a MEAN idle <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
#5
G5 vs T1 cam
Help me out. I'm ready to buy a cam, but I am stuck on which one to get. I have heard great things about the G5 but I just watched a vid of a T1 cammed T/A and god it sounds great! Here is what I'm looking for:
1. Sound like a pro stock car at idle
2. Stock heads
3. NO PCM programming
I know this is the place to get the advice I need.
1. Sound like a pro stock car at idle
2. Stock heads
3. NO PCM programming
I know this is the place to get the advice I need.