Dyno graph for a TR 220/220 114 or 112
Re: Dyno graph for a TR 220/220 114 or 112 I have the TR 220/220 114 LSA cam on my 99 SS M6. I dynoed 345 HP, 335 TQ after having the cam and Grotyohann headers installed. That doesn't sound impressive, but this was on a dynojet that typically dynos about 20 HP low, plus my 4.10 gears probably cost 5-10 HP on the dyno. So I figure more like 370-375 HP. I don't have any way to post the graph, but peak HP was at 6200 RPMs.
Re: Dyno graph for a TR 220/220 114 or 112 No graph to post,but #'s were 335hp/350tq before and 370hp/370tq after w/tuning on MAFT.Mods in sig.Cam and ported TB are only difference.114 duration.
<small>[ June 05, 2002, 09:37 PM: Message edited by: Slowhawk ]</small>
<small>[ June 05, 2002, 09:37 PM: Message edited by: Slowhawk ]</small>
Re: Dyno graph for a TR 220/220 114 or 112 Thanks for the info. Those are very impressive numbers. BadSS and Slowhawk since you can not post the graph could you post what your HP and TQ numbers at 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000, 5500, 6000, 6500?
Thanks
John
Thanks
John
Re: Dyno graph for a TR 220/220 114 or 112 Here it is
rpm--before hp/tq--after hp/tq
2500-150hp/300tq--150hp/310tq--start of pull
3000-170hp/310tq--180hp/330tq
3500-220hp/330tq--240hp/350tq
4000-260hp/340tq--280hp/370tq
4500-290hp/340tq--320hp/370tq
5000-325hp/340hp--350hp/370tq
5500-330hp/330tq--370hp/350tq
6000-320hp/280tq--370hp/330tq
6500-N/a----------360hp/290tq
The Cam held the power all the way to 6600.These were also on 2 different days with A/F adjusted to 12.8-1 on a MAFT.
rpm--before hp/tq--after hp/tq
2500-150hp/300tq--150hp/310tq--start of pull
3000-170hp/310tq--180hp/330tq
3500-220hp/330tq--240hp/350tq
4000-260hp/340tq--280hp/370tq
4500-290hp/340tq--320hp/370tq
5000-325hp/340hp--350hp/370tq
5500-330hp/330tq--370hp/350tq
6000-320hp/280tq--370hp/330tq
6500-N/a----------360hp/290tq
The Cam held the power all the way to 6600.These were also on 2 different days with A/F adjusted to 12.8-1 on a MAFT.
On The Tree
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: W.Palm Beach, Fl.
Re: Dyno graph for a TR 220/220 114 or 112 I also have the TR 220 114 lsa cam and am very happy with it. Sorry I don't have dyno numbers. After putting this cam in, it was almost as good as after I put in the Yank. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo Re: Dyno graph for a TR 220/220 114 or 112 Slowhawk I created a graph of your before and after dyno numbers. The graph really helps me see how much improvement the cam gave you.
See link below.
TR220 dyno graph link
John
<small>[ June 07, 2002, 09:28 PM: Message edited by: JNorris ]</small>
See link below.
TR220 dyno graph link
John
<small>[ June 07, 2002, 09:28 PM: Message edited by: JNorris ]</small>
Re: Dyno graph for a TR 220/220 114 or 112 JNorris- I will get you the rest of those numbers when I get home. Don't have the dyno graph at work.
NastyC5- According to Thunder Racing, the difference between the 220 and the 224 cams is only about 5 HP. But I haven't seen any dyno graphs where the 220 put down the big numbers we have seen from the 224.
<small>[ June 07, 2002, 04:02 PM: Message edited by: BADSS ]</small>
NastyC5- According to Thunder Racing, the difference between the 220 and the 224 cams is only about 5 HP. But I haven't seen any dyno graphs where the 220 put down the big numbers we have seen from the 224.
<small>[ June 07, 2002, 04:02 PM: Message edited by: BADSS ]</small>
