flow #'s for ported dart 225's
#1
flow #'s for ported dart 225's
can ya'll please post complete flow numbers achieved with the dart 225's i just got mine back and they sound kinda low. ex flowed 224 cfm
int before
1 25 74
2 43 127
3 69 204
4 83 245
4.5 91 269
5 96 284
5.5 66 295
6 68 303
1 28 82
2 51 150
3 70 207
4 88 260
4.5 94 278
5 98 290
5.5 68 303
6 70 312
6.5 71 317
flowed @ 28" water
ok now can someone also please breakdown the numbers.....i know the col to the right is cfm and i figure on the left is lift but whats the middle? thanks.....the heads cost 910 to do the port work plus 250 to repair the chamber that was trashed... but since hans quoted me 850 originally thats what i payed plus $88 in tax.are the numbers ok?
int before
1 25 74
2 43 127
3 69 204
4 83 245
4.5 91 269
5 96 284
5.5 66 295
6 68 303
1 28 82
2 51 150
3 70 207
4 88 260
4.5 94 278
5 98 290
5.5 68 303
6 70 312
6.5 71 317
flowed @ 28" water
ok now can someone also please breakdown the numbers.....i know the col to the right is cfm and i figure on the left is lift but whats the middle? thanks.....the heads cost 910 to do the port work plus 250 to repair the chamber that was trashed... but since hans quoted me 850 originally thats what i payed plus $88 in tax.are the numbers ok?
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is a little easier to read format. I do not know what the middle numbers are.
Code:
Before Lift ???? CFM Improvement 1 25 74 2 43 127 3 69 204 4 83 245 4.5 91 269 5 96 284 5.5 66 295 6 68 303 After 1 28 82 8 2 51 150 23 3 70 207 3 4 88 260 15 4.5 94 278 9 5 98 290 6 5.5 68 303 8 6 70 312 9 6.5 71 317 N/A
#3
the middle is the percentage it flowed in range 3 on the flowbench then once it got close to 100% of that range they switched to range 4....decent numbers I suppose, what size valve?
#4
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
Well here's another thread of a before and after with the Dart 225. Just food for thought.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/514551-dart-225-after-info.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/514551-dart-225-after-info.html
#5
I had a set of PRC Dart Stage 2 heads that I sent back to Dart due to oil control issues. In return, the replaced my heads with some that they did a clean-up job on. They sent me full flow sheets from both sets of heads. In fairness, all flow numbers were achieved on Dart's inhouse flowbench.
PRC ported Stage 2 Darts
Intake...........Corr CFM.......%Exh/Int
.200............146.7
.300............210.6
.400............267.3
.500............302.1
.600............310.3
.700............308.1
Exhaust
.200............103.3............70.4
.300............143.7............68.2
.400............182.2............68.2
.500............207.1............68.5
.600............223.0............71.9
.700............232.3............75.4
Darts with cleanup work performed at Dart (not sure if 205 or 225 ports)
Intake...........Corr CFM.......%Exh/Int
.200............149.3
.300............205.1
.400............261.5
.500............293.2
.600............319.5
.700............334.0
Exhaust
.200............111.7............74.8
.300............153.3............74.7
.400............190.3............72.8
.500............218.0............74.3
.600............228.8............72.5
.700............235.7............70.6
All flow work was performed on a 4 inch bore with radiused inlets and no exhaust port adapter. I don't have flow numbers on what the box stock Darts flow, but I am sure someone on here has flowed a set. If not, call John over at Dart and I am sure he can get you some hard data.
Hope this helps!
Galen
PRC ported Stage 2 Darts
Intake...........Corr CFM.......%Exh/Int
.200............146.7
.300............210.6
.400............267.3
.500............302.1
.600............310.3
.700............308.1
Exhaust
.200............103.3............70.4
.300............143.7............68.2
.400............182.2............68.2
.500............207.1............68.5
.600............223.0............71.9
.700............232.3............75.4
Darts with cleanup work performed at Dart (not sure if 205 or 225 ports)
Intake...........Corr CFM.......%Exh/Int
.200............149.3
.300............205.1
.400............261.5
.500............293.2
.600............319.5
.700............334.0
Exhaust
.200............111.7............74.8
.300............153.3............74.7
.400............190.3............72.8
.500............218.0............74.3
.600............228.8............72.5
.700............235.7............70.6
All flow work was performed on a 4 inch bore with radiused inlets and no exhaust port adapter. I don't have flow numbers on what the box stock Darts flow, but I am sure someone on here has flowed a set. If not, call John over at Dart and I am sure he can get you some hard data.
Hope this helps!
Galen
#7
Originally Posted by clone
thanks for the responses.....valves are 205 160 what type of oil problem where you having and is it common?
Galen
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Galen
Oil problem is NOT common. Just about the only ones that had the problem were the ones ported by PRC. They no longer port the Darts that I know of due to this problem.
Galen
Galen
#10
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by Bigchickenhawk
Yeah I am fairly sure PRC has NO idea what they are doing. Think they had basically a total recall on ALL those dart heads they ported.
Trevor
Texas Speed & Performance
#11
10 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Olive Branch MS/Memphis
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Galen
Oil problem is NOT common. Just about the only ones that had the problem were the ones ported by PRC. They no longer port the Darts that I know of due to this problem.
Galen
Galen
I agree... I feel bad that the Dart heads got a bad reputation due to work done on them by someone else. I think many people shy away from these heads due to all the problems with the PRC ported heads. I love mine. They are a great heads and you can't beat the price. I know I could have bought "better" heads but I just didn't want to spend $2000+. I bet PRC is not on Dart's christmas card list anymore!!!
#12
TECH Fanatic
Originally Posted by Hugger
I agree... I feel bad that the Dart heads got a bad reputation due to work done on them by someone else. I think many people shy away from these heads due to all the problems with the PRC ported heads. I love mine. They are a great heads and you can't beat the price. I know I could have bought "better" heads but I just didn't want to spend $2000+. I bet PRC is not on Dart's christmas card list anymore!!!
The problem with the oil consumption was not a PRC problem.The problem was from faulty valve guides from Dart.This is a "beating a dead horse topic" no need to reopen this discussion.
#15
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
All the benches are going to differ some. If you look at your before numbers compared to the PRC ported numbers, they are similar. Doesn't mean either are wrong but only shows to the issue of comparing results from different setups.
Do you have more information on their setup?
Do you have more information on their setup?
#18
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
And still since 2007 haven't heard of oil issues.
What i find funny on here is that guys ask questions on here everyone tells them to do a search.
Dare search and bring back wn old thread and someone got to criticize for bringing back a thread to life.
Yes I'm getting a set of Dart heads Today and looking to send them out for port work.
What i find funny on here is that guys ask questions on here everyone tells them to do a search.
Dare search and bring back wn old thread and someone got to criticize for bringing back a thread to life.
Yes I'm getting a set of Dart heads Today and looking to send them out for port work.
#19
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
As you can see, there were some hotly contested oil issues with the Dart heads. From my reading, some were due to over porting and later Dart was having issues with guides. I belonged to another forum (now closed) where there were several builders using Dart heads and were running into too much guide clearance and later guides misaligned with the valve seat. One stopped using their heads because the corrections we're getting too costly.
Fast forward to today. AI I using Dart cores very successfully so I believe issues of the past have been corrected.
I ran Dart 205's when they first came out with no problems at all, however they were as cast.
Fast forward to today. AI I using Dart cores very successfully so I believe issues of the past have been corrected.
I ran Dart 205's when they first came out with no problems at all, however they were as cast.