I was thinking trickfows?
#22
Banned
iTrader: (115)
Originally Posted by jeffstar
Do a search on my username....I've done 2 long write ups on my TFS heads, the install and the dyno results.
I had dyno numbers and poor track times with my last heads
#23
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I run the TFS heads and have track times but no dyno numbers. See link below.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/657138-how-good-trick-flow-heads-video-evidence-inside.html
John
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/657138-how-good-trick-flow-heads-video-evidence-inside.html
John
#24
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ny
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow nice times jnorris i am keeping the stock ci engine for a long time. i may never evan have a dffernet bottom end until i put twins on it after its paided off so im not worried about that. if slp headers arent known to make numbers which ones are? id love to get qtps but i cant afford them and there ory uless there headers work with a cheaper ory? so are the trickflows a newer head for the ls1s or just not as commonly used.
#25
TECH Resident
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: AUSTIN TX
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are the newest LS1 style head on the block (except for maybe the Edelbrocks), and from what I have seen they are leading the pack right now. If I were going to spend that kind of money, I would be getting the T/F's.
Last edited by BOWTIE; 02-17-2007 at 12:20 AM. Reason: clarification
#26
Originally Posted by N4cer
Mild? It looks like full bolt-ons to me.