Revised Dyno numbers for TR 409 SR...
Once you bolt it up to a Y-pipe or muffler system, that Venturi will only act as a restriction in an otherwise smooth pipe.
Tony
I'm really a scientist at heart <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
My hypothesis is that the straight collectors, X-pipe, dual bullet muffler setup will be the ticket for power...
Shane
<small>[ July 12, 2002, 12:14 PM: Message edited by: XtraCajunSS ]</small>
Most people fall into the "bigger is better" category. They don't understand compressible gas flow, especially at higher velocity (exhaust is supersonic, intake is subsonic speed). The statement should read "Bigger is better IF you need it".
For example, when I was 346ci, I tried dual 2.5" cutouts instead of a single 3" cutout, and lost over 30 ft-lbs peak torque. YUCK! My peak HP only went up about 2 rwhp. YUCK!
Another example, when Judson was running the 375ci solid roller setup (~500 rwhp) his car made more power and torque with 2.5" extensions on his open headers. The 3.0" extensions actually performed worse on the track and the dynojet. I found the same thing with my 382ci and open headers. Bigger isn't always better!
Tony
<strong>My concern with merge collectors is I've heard you have to "dial" them in. I want something I can just bolt up and know it's giving me more power. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> When I go to a larger motor I'll have to use these dynatech headers with 3.5" merge collectors. They seem to be making a difference on large motors. Jason didn't you lose like 5hp with the exact same headers on your 346ci though?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yes he did.
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Terry Burger:
<strong>My concern with merge collectors is I've heard you have to "dial" them in. I want something I can just bolt up and know it's giving me more power. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> When I go to a larger motor I'll have to use these dynatech headers with 3.5" merge collectors. They seem to be making a difference on large motors. Jason didn't you lose like 5hp with the exact same headers on your 346ci though?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yes he did.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">He lost power going to 3.5" collectors on stock heads and bottom end? Who would have guessed? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" />
Yes, the headers didn't do anything from 2000-2500, gained 10hp/tq from 3000-4000 and lost 5-6hp/tq from 4000-7000 by going to the exact same setup Shane has on his car now.
Nick, you never know if something will work unless you try it. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" />
<small>[ July 12, 2002, 12:52 PM: Message edited by: Jason99T/A ]</small>
<strong>
Most people fall into the "bigger is better" category
Tony</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Well....bigger is always better in a turbo car <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
Exhaust is so much simpler <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
By Friday, the new driveshaft and exhaust should be installed. It looks like the first track visit will be the following Friday...
The biggest holdup in getting to the track is my job. I've been on the road for the last 2 weeks so I haven't been able to finish all the details on the car. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Sad]" src="gr_sad.gif" />
I'll post results good or bad... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Shane
<small>[ July 22, 2002, 10:10 PM: Message edited by: XtraCajunSS ]</small>
BTW Vince, I forgot to mention in my previous post... 4.57 gears are a good thing... <img border="0" alt="[devil]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_devil.gif" />
Shane
<small>[ July 22, 2002, 10:26 PM: Message edited by: XtraCajunSS ]</small>
[QBI can't wait to swap my FLPs for Dynatech stepped headers now!Tony[/QB]</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Do you know if they are going to make a set of stepped headers for C5s?? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" />
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Nine Ball:
[QBI can't wait to swap my FLPs for Dynatech stepped headers now!Tony</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Do you know if they are going to make a set of stepped headers for C5s?? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> [/QB]</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You know, as far as I am concerned, I'm not sure if the stepped header idea is valid. I think the car just needed more header and that the 1 7/8" is the way to go. I hope to do a back to back comparison of the stepped versus straight design... I'm not sure if I can make it happen but I am curious.
I know Dynatech only offers BBC headers for late model Corvettes currently...
Shane
Shane
This is an awesome motor. Hats off to Thunder Racing!! <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />


