confused
Some of you say that LS6 heads are no better than LS1 heads. You guys also talk about reverse split cams.
What I have sitting here is: LS6 heads with 2.050 / 1.60 valves they were ported and assembled by Pete at "CNC". The cam he recommended (for power) is: 224/228, .581/.588 112 LSA
The commpresion will be somewhere around : 11.2 - 11.4
the same exact heads but 10.7 compression made 430 rwhp on a C5 runing rich ( I don't remember the torque)
So I figured being I will have Grott's (if they ever arrive) and I don't have as much drivetrain loss and the higher compression and tuning ON a dyno, 450 rwhp is realistic. But I don't see anyone with a cam similar to mine.
could someone let me know if I should make a change before puting all this on my car?
also did I waste money on the LS6 heads?
I don't mean to **** & moan but..........
By the way after reading all this stuff on bigger cubed motors, I'm interested. Which is the better way to go: short block from ARE or CARTEK or 6.0 motor and go from there?
ANY HELP IS GREATLY APPRECIATED
THANX
MAULER <img border="0" alt="[Firebird]" title="" src="graemlins/formula.gif" />
For the stock cubes, LS6 heads (ported) will provide comparable numbers to LS1 heads (ported). Engines with greater than 346 ci or revving to the moon will see a much greater benefit with the LS6 head, and will dyno and trap consistently better than LS1 heads.
Your cam, it really depends on the porter, so I would listen to his advice. If you decide to up the cubes though, you will most defiantly want to change your cam.
As for increasing your cubes.
Stroker - Cheap (relatively), lots of torque
Bore - Expensive, better HP gains
Bore / Stroke - I hate you
Talk to MTI, they seem to be the leading folks in upper the cubes on our motors. They are a sponser on the right.
Good Luck
<img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />




