





to advance or not to advance: that is the question..
Secondly, you really have to see how it performs once the heads are on. The added compression will really wake the car up. That being said, my cam with +2 degrees advance peaks very high at 6500+. Even a little too high for my tastes. The HP drops less than 5 HP off peak all the way to the 6800 red line. How high are you planning on spinning the motor?
I did not vote because I don't know and don't want to screw your numbers up in the vote...
Nevertheless, I have +4 degrees advance ground into that new cam I am getting....
It came that way used, but I want to see what it will do...I think I will have a very nice powerband with the cam!
Erik

i have arp rod bolts so im not worried about spinning it. right now i shift it at 6800 anyways. rev is set at 7 or 7100 i forget.
stock heads (right now) : 10.23/ 7.78 cr assumin 67 cc heads (i forgot stock cc's on 853's.)
tfs heads no advance : 11.48/ 8.54 cr
tfs heads 2* advance: 11.48/ 8.70 cr
Last edited by NC98Z; Jun 12, 2007 at 06:58 PM. Reason: add
I've built LS1 N/A motors with heads flowing in the 345cfm range on 427ci with 11/1 C/R. The cam was big 242-248 on 114 lsa; the motor put 550HP to the wheels with 515 Ft Lbs of Tq, in a 2006 C5.
Very broad torque and Hp curve, excellent drivability, great power, you would make a bit more peak power with the cam advanced but for a street driven car I would go straight up with the cam.
Harold
Port Pros LLC
512-257-0222




