Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Technical ? about heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 08:53 PM
  #1  
La.LS1SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default Technical ? about heads

Ok, I need some help being educated on the performance aspects of cylinder heads. I'm going to give you the specs on 2 unidentified heads, and I'd like to know which would be preferred and why.

Head #1: 2.02" intake, 1.575" exhaust, 225cc intake, decked and ported, with 64.5cc chambers.

Head #2: 2.05" intake, 1.60" exhaust, 225cc intake, 62cc chambers.

Well....I'll explain everything in the end. Thanks for the help!
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 09:04 PM
  #2  
WILWAXU's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,378
Likes: 1
From: League City, TX
Default

Moving to Internal Engine.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 11:19 PM
  #3  
GOaT Cheese's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

I like head #1, slightly smaller valves will keep the velocities up with those 225's.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007 | 01:31 AM
  #4  
Evans752's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 565
Likes: 1
From: Logan, West Virginia
Default

It is all going to depend on the cam and the tune afterwards. You didnt say anything about what you are looking to get or if your car is auto or 6 speed or what kind of gear you have are going to get so until that you wont get the answer your looking for but good luck.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2007 | 05:54 PM
  #5  
CoozePoodle's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Default

OMG thats like saying... "Hey guys, i have a car, what carb should i run"

you neeed SOOOO much more info to begin to make a choice..

I mean c'mon...
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2007 | 06:00 PM
  #6  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

I am now dumber after reading this thread.

really, those specs of the heads are not telling us much at all. Need more data as well as what cam is being matched to the heads.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2007 | 06:11 PM
  #7  
1997bird's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
From: Aztec, NM
Default

Originally Posted by La.LS1SS
Head #1: 2.02" intake, 1.575" exhaust, 225cc intake, decked and ported, with 64.5cc chambers. A: TSP

Head #2: 2.05" intake, 1.60" exhaust, 225cc intake, 62cc chambers. A: Dart
#2 b/c its been Super Sized & when used properly in a Trafic Court of Law it will net you a bigger speeding penalty.

Last edited by 1997bird; Jul 14, 2007 at 08:51 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 01:16 AM
  #8  
ERIK@MASPORT's Avatar
Closed Sponsor Account
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Default

I'd pick a cam first....then heads to match (as previously stated)

Erik
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 09:50 AM
  #9  
MPHmotorsports's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Really a wasted thread. For us to give a helpful answer we need more info.
Looks like your trying to compare 2 heads that are very similar. But who makes the heads, what do they flow? What cam are you using? What size motor do you have? What intake/TB are you running.
Basicially you have asked a question with such little info you are wasting peoples time.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 12:09 PM
  #10  
Red99C5's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: PNW
Default

Originally Posted by La.LS1SS
Ok, I need some help being educated on the performance aspects of cylinder heads. I'm going to give you the specs on 2 unidentified heads, and I'd like to know which would be preferred and why.

Head #1: 2.02" intake, 1.575" exhaust, 225cc intake, decked and ported, with 64.5cc chambers.

Head #2: 2.05" intake, 1.60" exhaust, 225cc intake, 62cc chambers.

Well....I'll explain everything in the end. Thanks for the help!
Are you building a motor around the heads?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 12:18 PM
  #11  
3.4camaro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Galveston, TX
Default

I think he's trying to show that it doesn't matter what brand heads are, that they can still perform. It's a totally false assumption, so whatever. He's just trying to justify saving money. Get some trick flows if you have cash, or get TSP if you're on a budget.


The fact that the valve sizes are the same is like saying 2 cars are the same because they have the same size tires.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 12:20 PM
  #12  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by 3.4camaro
The fact that the valve sizes are the same is like saying 2 cars are the same because they have the same size tires.
Good comparison
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #13  
3.4camaro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Galveston, TX
Default

thats all this website is, stupid comparisons.

ricer comparisons
arguing vs. special olympics
etc.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 PM.