Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS6 or thunder racing 224 cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2008, 05:27 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
sum guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 213
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default LS6 or thunder racing 224 cam?

I am putting this in a 4000 pound truck with a stock torque convertor and 3.55 gear. I use the truck to drive back and forth to work ect. Worried about the 224 being to big for the stock convertor and idling too aggressive in stop and go traffic. Oh yea it is a 6.0 with a 4l60e.
Old 02-12-2008, 05:48 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
mchdg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sum guy
I am putting this in a 4000 pound truck with a stock torque convertor and 3.55 gear. I use the truck to drive back and forth to work ect. Worried about the 224 being to big for the stock convertor and idling too aggressive in stop and go traffic. Oh yea it is a 6.0 with a 4l60e.
I put the 224 with a 112 LSA in my car with a stock converter and 3.23 gears and it drove just fine. I'm not sure but I think the 6.0 trucks got the 4L80 with a lower first gear but the 3.55s would make up for it.
Old 02-12-2008, 05:52 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
98RedZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The idle should be fine, not sure about stock converter. How about something in between? TR220 or the Cheater maybe?
Old 02-12-2008, 06:30 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
DaveX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

As a general rule, the more cubes you have the bigger the cam you can go without issues. I don't have any personal experience with the 6.0 but I would think the 224 is a pretty mild cam for it and should work ok.
Old 02-12-2008, 07:22 PM
  #5  
Banned
iTrader: (54)
 
Jantzer98SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Grants Pass, OR
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have the 2001 LS6 cam in my 6.0 in my 91 truck, stock stall 4l80. The heads are ported as well. It pulls hard to 6500 atleast. I also have 35's with 4.88's though. I think a 224 would be a bit much. I just picked up a 214/220 on a 111. I think the 111 will help keep the rpm band down. The problem with the LS6 cam is it's not really a torq cam with a 117 lobe sep. The LS6 cam isn't bad for a budget cam, but you can do better on a used cam around here. I would keep it between 210 and 220 personally if you daily drive and care about mileage and towing. If you just want a fast street truck then go 224 or bigger, but put a stall in it.
Old 02-12-2008, 08:12 PM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
1Bad00SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd be willing to bet the truck will pick up power off idle with that 224 cam over the stock cam and the ls6... my 226/226 patriot cam did with the stock converter. Go for the 224, that 6.0 will eat it up, and you will certainly be able to leave the stock idle speed as well if you'd like.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 PM.