Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Valve spring question.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #1  
SSsuperdave's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Santa Fe,TN
Default Valve spring question.

Is it overkill to be running dual springs rated to .650 on a cam that nets only .555 lift. I understand that I won't be pushing the springs to their limit but is the extra spring pressure counter productive to any horsepower benefit? Or would the pressures equalize out, i.e. one compressing, another expanding so in turn end up being neutral forces? Or would I be better off going for a single coil, beehive spring closer to the cam lift to minamize harmful harmonics?
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 01:19 PM
  #2  
JPH's Avatar
JPH
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Default

Originally Posted by SSsuperdave
Is it overkill to be running dual springs rated to .650 on a cam that nets only .555 lift. I understand that I won't be pushing the springs to their limit but is the extra spring pressure counter productive to any horsepower benefit? Or would the pressures equalize out, i.e. one compressing, another expanding so in turn end up being neutral forces? Or would I be better off going for a single coil, beehive spring closer to the cam lift to minamize harmful harmonics?
what'a the cam profile and how hard you going to spin the motor?
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 07:02 PM
  #3  
litle88's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 4
From: Burbank, Illinois
Default

Been thinking the same thing!
My cam is a HOtcam 218/228 and .525 lift, with 1.8 Harland sharp RR's, which equals a new lift of .556 and new duration is 220/230. Sorry didn't mean to highjack!
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 08:07 PM
  #4  
onecrazygm's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Default

any time that happens it will benifit everyone has there debates try putting stock springs with stock cam then try putting aftermarket springs with stock cam it makes the world of a diffrence goes eathier way thou
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 08:44 PM
  #5  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

Originally Posted by SSsuperdave
Is it overkill to be running dual springs rated to .650 on a cam that nets only .555 lift. I understand that I won't be pushing the springs to their limit but is the extra spring pressure counter productive to any horsepower benefit? Or would the pressures equalize out, i.e. one compressing, another expanding so in turn end up being neutral forces? Or would I be better off going for a single coil, beehive spring closer to the cam lift to minamize harmful harmonics?
You're probably better off running a single beehive for a .555" lift cam. A dual valvespring capable of .650" would either:

a)cause you to run excessive coilbind clearance which reduces a springs harmonic dampening effect

b)cause you to shim the hell out of the spring in order to reach an adequate coilbind clearance, but also resulting in excessive seat pressures.

A single beehive spring, on the other hand, will probably control the valvetrain and reduce fuss points better with less spring pressure, ie friction.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 03:17 PM
  #6  
Last C5's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA.
Default

Originally Posted by litle88
Been thinking the same thing!
My cam is a HOtcam 218/228 and .525 lift, with 1.8 Harland sharp RR's, which equals a new lift of .556 and new duration is 220/230. Sorry didn't mean to highjack!
This is almost identicle to my Z06 with 1.8 YTs. I'm running PAC 1518 beehive springs that are good to .650 and I'm routinely spinning this motor to 6,500 as it's a track car. So far everything is working out just fine.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 06:01 PM
  #7  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
You're probably better off running a single beehive for a .555" lift cam. A dual valvespring capable of .650" would either:

a)cause you to run excessive coilbind clearance which reduces a springs harmonic dampening effect

b)cause you to shim the hell out of the spring in order to reach an adequate coilbind clearance, but also resulting in excessive seat pressures.

A single beehive spring, on the other hand, will probably control the valvetrain and reduce fuss points better with less spring pressure, ie friction.
I like the way you explain things.
OP Listen to this guy.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 06:47 PM
  #8  
litle88's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 4
From: Burbank, Illinois
Default

well there you have it!!
I guess were screwed with some patriot springs....damn its 200 for the spring install! and if I buy a cam with a 59? lift I'm ok and a cam install is 400bux man oh man, more money to blow......
all of this from recommendations by my installer!
thank you predator for chiming in KCS for the elaboration.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 10:52 PM
  #9  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

Originally Posted by litle88
well there you have it!!
I guess were screwed with some patriot springs....damn its 200 for the spring install! and if I buy a cam with a 59? lift I'm ok and a cam install is 400bux man oh man, more money to blow......
all of this from recommendations by my installer!
thank you predator for chiming in KCS for the elaboration.
No problem, here to help.

Pred, thanks for the compliment.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 05:09 PM
  #10  
litle88's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 4
From: Burbank, Illinois
Default

I called Patriot today and spoke to Chad, Wow do they have some of the best customer service there. They even took the time to help me with some other issues!
But he said I should be fine with the Harland 1.8's and have no worries with any *excessive coilbind clearance which reduces a springs harmonic dampening effect
*cause you to shim the hell out of the spring in order to reach an adequate coilbind clearance, but also resulting in excessive seat pressures
Thanks Chad @ patriot performance!
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 AM.