Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Question about cam advance.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-2008, 11:04 AM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1 BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Elgin
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Question about cam advance.

Have a question about cam advance. I was wondering if you advance a cam two degrees (double roller chain) what difference does it make in the IVC. My cam has a IVC of 53. Which might be a little late. Seems to lack low end torque a little. I would like to get some torque back.
Old 08-21-2008, 03:01 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1 BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Elgin
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Some looks but no responses. I've been kicking around some new cam specs based on some past combos. I'm trying to figure out some valve events on a new cam I thought about. I tried the spreed sheet but I don't have excel. XER or XFI

dur.050 238/242
lsa 112
installed at 110 lobe sep.(+2)
16 degress overlap
Should be good N/A and 200 shot.


Motor is 12/1 comp speed inc 348

Maybe Predator or Pat G can chime in.

Last edited by LS1 BU; 08-23-2008 at 06:24 PM.
Old 08-21-2008, 06:27 PM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Tom@SpeedInc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

IMO rather go with a smaller duration cam, if your concerned about low end power.

however the exhaust opening sooner should be good on spray if you were to install that cam at 108 ICL.
Old 08-21-2008, 06:39 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
ssmith512's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd like to know as well.
Old 08-22-2008, 12:06 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
SOMbitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,881
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Advancing the cam will bring the power (torque) in a BIT sooner but will reduce PTV clearance if that is a concern.
Old 08-23-2008, 11:28 AM
  #6  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1 BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Elgin
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just trying to get a 12 comp motor to run on pump gas and make good tq. My last cam which was on the limit of running on pump gas had a IVC of 47 degrees. My current cam has a IVC of 53 which makes it run on pump gas but lost power down low. Just trying to find a happy medium. The cam that I speced is XER

238/242
.6xx/.6xx
intake center line 110(+2)
lobe sep 112

16 degrees overlap
IVC of 49 degrees.

I think this cam should be a good na/nos cam.
Old 08-23-2008, 02:24 PM
  #7  
JPH
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
JPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1 BU
Have a question about cam advance. I was wondering if you advance a cam two degrees (double roller chain) what difference does it make in the IVC. My cam has a IVC of 53. Which might be a little late. Seems to lack low end torque a little. I would like to get some torque back.
Will you be advancing it at the cam gear or crank gear, because crank gear will need speeded up more. What is you current cam profile now and what intake mainfold you got?
Old 08-23-2008, 02:38 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1 BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Elgin
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

advance would be ground into cam. Intake is ported fast 90mm
Old 08-23-2008, 03:06 PM
  #9  
JPH
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
JPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1 BU
advance would be ground into cam. Intake is ported fast 90mm
238/242 112+4 you want, which I get IVC of 47*(will vary on certain lobes/cam companys). And you want to move your rpm sooner I take it. I would use a smaller cam IMO, and tighten up the LDA. You can try speeding the cam up more 2* that will help a little, (cam is BIG), but the intake mainfold has alot to do where the motor peaks also.
Old 08-23-2008, 03:16 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1 BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Elgin
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just trying to make good low end power My last cam had a IVC of 47 degrees but it would not run on straight 93 octane. After we pulled a little timing and added fuel it would run fine. Unless hot outside. It would get some knock. Current cam has a IVC of 53 and runs on 93. When I swaped cams I lost 14 rwtq at peak and alot under the curve. 4000-5000 area. Just trying to get some of the power back and run on 93 octane. That's why I went with 2 advance to get the IVC of 49

Current cam is 240/244 LSK lobes.
lobe sep 113.5
intake centerline 113.0
with IVC 53
15 degress overlap.

Previous cam is LSK/XER
235/240
lobe sep 111
intake centerline 109.5
15 degrees overlap
IVC of 47
Old 08-23-2008, 03:17 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
 
ssmith512's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good info.
Old 08-23-2008, 03:23 PM
  #12  
JPH
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
JPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1 BU
Just trying to make good low end power My last cam had a IVC of 47 degrees but it would not run on straight 93 octane. After we pulled a little timing and added fuel it would run fine. Unless hot outside. It would get some knock. Current cam has a IVC of 53 and runs on 93. When I swaped cams I lost 14 rwtq at peak and alot under the curve. 4000-5000 area. Just trying to get some of the power back and run on 93 octane. That's why I went with 2 advance to get the IVC of 49

Current cam is 240/244 LSK lobes.
lobe sep 113.5
intake centerline 113.0
with IVC 53
15 degress overlap.

Previous cam is LSK/XER
235/240
lobe sep 111
intake centerline 109.5
15 degrees overlap
IVC of 47
New cam is BIG, I wouldn't expect much "LOW END" out of the new grind. Expect a 3800-6800 power band, peaking at 6450 or higher.
Old 08-23-2008, 03:36 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1 BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Elgin
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I shift a 7000 rpm and rev to 7300. That's not an issue. Just trying to close the intake valve a little sooner to get dcr back to where it should be. I don't have the formula to figure it out. I have a 12/1 compression motor with the cams that i have run. I estimate my compression with new cam specd at IVC of 49 should put me in the 8.80-8.90 area. That should work on 93 octane.
Old 08-23-2008, 06:04 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1 BU
I shift a 7000 rpm and rev to 7300. That's not an issue. Just trying to close the intake valve a little sooner to get dcr back to where it should be. I don't have the formula to figure it out. I have a 12/1 compression motor with the cams that i have run. I estimate my compression with new cam specd at IVC of 49 should put me in the 8.80-8.90 area. That should work on 93 octane.
What plugs are you running?
Old 08-23-2008, 06:19 PM
  #15  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1 BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Elgin
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I was running a tr6 when both setups were tuned N/A. I would switch over to a tr7 plug for N/A with new cam. I think the Tr6 might be a little hot.
Old 08-23-2008, 06:22 PM
  #16  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1 BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Elgin
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

New cam would be

XER or XFI can't make up mind

dur @ .050 238/242
icl 110(+2)
lobe sep 112
Would give me IVC or 49 degrees
Old 08-24-2008, 03:54 AM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1 BU
I was running a tr6 when both setups were tuned N/A. I would switch over to a tr7 plug for N/A with new cam. I think the Tr6 might be a little hot.
Read your plugs, you can tell right away if there are too hot. I run 12:1 with TR6 and 94 Octane, 26.5* WOT max timing, no issues (super hot weather), tuned a little rich to cool cylinders, lean at cruise. daily Driver.

47.5 IVC
Old 08-24-2008, 10:17 AM
  #18  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1 BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Elgin
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hey predator can you help me figure out DCR with cam setup. Motor is 348 at 12/1 static compression. Still not sure which lobe I would run. I've run LSK lobes and XER lobes. Don't have experience with XFI lobes. I have springs setup to run LSK lobes. Just have heard that they are hard on valvetrain parts. My heads are ET 215 heads.

. AT the same time I swaped cams had my fast 90/90 ported and went from macs to hooker 1 7/8 long tubes. I only picked up 6 hp up to and lost alot down low. I think the cam I specd should be a happy medium between the two and run on pump gas.


Current cam is 240/244 LSK lobes.
lobe sep 113.5
intake centerline 113.0
with IVC 53
15 degress overlap

Last cam is
235/240
lobe sep 111
intake centerline 109.5
15 degrees overlap
IVC of 47

new cam
238/242
.6xx/.6xx
intake center line 110(+2)
lobe sep 112

16 degrees overlap
IVC of 49 degrees.

I think this cam should be a good na/nos cam
new specd cam




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.