Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Narrowed my cam choice down to 2!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-03-2008, 04:32 PM
  #21  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Gordon0652's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,188
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Anybody else?
Old 09-03-2008, 06:00 PM
  #22  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
blownws6_nc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC.
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

another option would be to get (predator-z) to spec you a cam. sen him a pm. & he'll hook you up. Brian
Old 09-03-2008, 10:44 PM
  #23  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Gordon0652's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,188
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I looked into the Tick Performance Polluter Cam, and they "brag" about how much torque they have on the low end. I was just comparing my dyno graph to theres and @ 220rpm i have a little over 300 ft/lb of torque and the Polluter cam has a little over 300 ft/lb of torque @ 2900rpm but after that it gains quick!
Well these are just dyno graphs done on different Dynos, but the cam is intresting i want to see what it does at the track! I think i might have to wait.
Old 09-04-2008, 05:42 AM
  #24  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

bear in mind that tq will mean little with a stall converter..not to mention the trex cam makes similar tq at low rpms. i don't think tq at a given rpm is the best judge of a cam. we shall see. it will run like all of the other big cams and not offer enough tq in the low-midrange to tell a difference other than on a dyno.
Old 09-04-2008, 05:49 PM
  #25  
Teching In
iTrader: (4)
 
Boosted408's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had a G5X3 112 LSA in my old motor. It dynoed 395 horses and 383 ft. lbs tuned at Texas Speed. I was happy with it. Driveability wasn't horrible either. I was (and still am) running a SPEC 3 clutch. I know . I'm doing an MS4 and PRC Stage 1 heads on my new motor. It isn't in the car yet so I don't have numbers for you. Either way. The G5X3 was a good cam. Also, don't change your mind because of the numbers. I sold the cam to a buddy and he dynoed a little over 410 horse. Some cars are dyno queens. Hope this helps.
Old 09-04-2008, 05:52 PM
  #26  
Teching In
 
S0MWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am thinking of dropping an MS4 in my WS6. I had an MS3 in my Z28 for a couple years and it was a great cam and not as bad on the street as people make it out to be. TSP makes great products
Old 09-04-2008, 06:03 PM
  #27  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (28)
 
WYATT318MOPAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Grayson, KY 41143
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

As Far As Sound And Performance Factor On A Non Daily Driver I Am All For The Ms4....my Cam Is Close Just Not That High Of Lift...i Have Yet To Get To Fire It Off Though...soon Very Soon.
Old 09-04-2008, 06:10 PM
  #28  
On The Tree
iTrader: (10)
 
OutToWinPAHC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NE Philadelphia PA
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I heard my MS3 in my open header 240sx today..... sounded awesome. I just thought the MS4 was a bit much for me.
Old 09-04-2008, 06:10 PM
  #29  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (32)
 
02TransAm/Batmobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southside Chicago
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

G5X3's will have better low-end torque than a MS4. I would get a G5X3 on a 110+4
Old 09-04-2008, 09:23 PM
  #30  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

We recently did tons of engine dyno testing with camshafts of different sizes. I just finished up a new lobe with the help of the engineers at Comp cams that worked pretty well for us. We were able to develop a 235/240 camshaft that makes within a couple hp of the MS4 camshaft & gives better p/v and great power across the board! I personally think this camshaft will be one of my favorites when we start installing them in customers cars. After dyno testing it next to the MS4, Torquer 3, and a few camshaft mentioned in this thread I think it's really a hard camshaft to beat.

The post someone above made claiming you'll see 10-15hp difference from one large cam to another is completely untrue. We tested 231/234 torquer all the way up to large 244/248 camshaft & what we found is the power between all camshaft we tested in this area was within about 10hp. The difference in TSP camshafts is we try to build the good peak power while keeping the torque peak at a reasonable rpm & making good power across the board. The MS4 made nearly identical peak power as the 244/248 camshaft but with a torque peak something like 500-600rpm earlier.

Give us a call in the morning & I'll gladly provide you with engine dyno testing graphs to help you research your decision. It's really hard to purchase a camshaft because there's lots of smoke & mirrors online. What I can offer you is our dyno testing that was done on a independent dyno. If for any reason someone doesn't agree with my dyno results, I'll galdy reproduce the tests as long as the person questioning the results pays the dyno fees if my numbers are correct.
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 09-04-2008, 09:27 PM
  #31  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (26)
 
04gtoBMXracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Albuquerque nm
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by firefighting1101
i happen to be a fan of the TREX
yeah i was just gonna ask... what about the rex???
Old 09-04-2008, 09:27 PM
  #32  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The baseline engine for our dyno tesing had a fast intake, prc spring kit & dyno headers. The baseline power was 416hp & 422lb ft of torque. The MS4 install made power output go up to 511hp & 440 torque. Power output was up nearly 100hp while making as much power as the smaller cams & stock camshaft at 3000rpm!
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 09-04-2008, 09:29 PM
  #33  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

02TransAm I'll take that bet with you. I've dyno tested XER lobe camshafts very similar to the camshaft your discussing. The MS4 is offered to our customers because we feel it's the best possible max effort camshaft available so far!!
Originally Posted by 02TransAm/Batmobile
G5X3's will have better low-end torque than a MS4. I would get a G5X3 on a 110+4
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 09-04-2008, 09:42 PM
  #34  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (5)
 
ryan@rpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bunn, NC
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F8L_LS1
a lot of tuners despise the MS4. from what i have heard, they are difficult to tune.

imo, i would get the G5X3 LSA 112.
I think this is due to lack of tuning skills. At our shop one of the mechanics daily drives his MS4(111) Z28. I have drove this car several times and you can put this car in 6th gear(3.42's) going 45mph and have no cam surge at all. The car pulls hard from down low. Kinda of suprised me !! Every car acts diffirent though. I have seen some cars with a TQ3 act up more than a MS4. Either way the MS4 is a great cam !!!
Old 09-04-2008, 09:48 PM
  #35  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (48)
 
firefighting1101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jkbadz28
I think this is due to lack of tuning skills. At our shop one of the mechanics daily drives his MS4(111) Z28. I have drove this car several times and you can put this car in 6th gear(3.42's) going 45mph and have no cam surge at all. The car pulls hard from down low. Kinda of suprised me !! Every car acts diffirent though. I have seen some cars with a TQ3 act up more than a MS4. Either way the MS4 is a great cam !!!

any half way descent tune should be able to roll in 6th gear at 45mph. the test is a first gear roll at 5-10 mph. if your car isnt bucking and surging while searching for a parking spot at the grocery then you have it down. and the fact is none of these big cams will be able to do that. it doesnt mater what tune you have.
Old 09-05-2008, 01:16 PM
  #36  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

G5x3 vII lsa ??. When used in my combo it made 360 rwtq at 2800 rpms and then jumped up from 3000 rpms. Peak torque was 445 at the wheels. 490 rwhp was pretty good too.

What parts are going to be used with your cam ??
Old 09-05-2008, 04:21 PM
  #37  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
junkz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99z28monster
your idle is all in the tune, a personal preference on what you will tolerate. If you think the G5 will make more power by all means go for that. But if your just looking for a nasty good power making cam, wait a bit and see if the polluter lives up to all the hype. It might be a good option and it isnt played out yet.
I am currently daily driving the Polluter untuned. It doesn't act too much different than the 228 cam i had, but the tune i had for the 228 sucked. I will have dyno numbers for you guys Tuesday evening.
Old 09-05-2008, 05:03 PM
  #38  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Gordon0652's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,188
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by junkz28
I am currently daily driving the Polluter untuned. It doesn't act too much different than the 228 cam i had, but the tune i had for the 228 sucked. I will have dyno numbers for you guys Tuesday evening.
Keep US updated! Will it be re-tuned?
Old 09-05-2008, 05:12 PM
  #39  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
SOMbitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,881
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

man,... that's a tough one. I honestly would talk to Predator-z or Pat-G and get a custom. Both of those wil make good power up top but MS4 = flycut on stock bottom end.
Old 09-05-2008, 05:36 PM
  #40  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Gordon0652's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,188
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SOMbitch
man,... that's a tough one. I honestly would talk to Predator-z or Pat-G and get a custom. Both of those wil make good power up top but MS4 = flycut on stock bottom end.
Flycut? You mean the Pistons?
With the MS4 you do not have to do that, the MS4 so far is the biggest cam you can have in a stock LS1 motor w/o flycutting the pistons.


Quick Reply: Narrowed my cam choice down to 2!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 AM.