Difference between TR224 and COMP224?
Why do you have a problem believing what they say? Its not like you have personal experience with their cam. TR says their cam is a little different and unless you have proof otherwise, then most people here don't have any reason to doubt them as they have a good reputation with people of this board. Now if you just wanted to argue that the differences weren't worth $50, then you would have made a valid point. But instead you implied that they were lying.
Do you have your TR cam yet?
If so, PM or E-mail me the #'s on the back of the camshaft. What you'll see is either a Comp part # or the lobes that are used & the LSA the lobes are on. Send me the info on the back of your TR cam & I will tell you for sure what lobes they used for your cam. That ought to put this thread to rest.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
As for little SIS, I can't beleive you would even consider comparing TR with Elgin. Elgin truly creates cams and has several competitive car running them. How many TR cams are being used in NHRA. Dude, please! Let's get real. Apples and apples ok SIS.
P.S. These anti-TR people were not around when the TR cams first came out. Thunder Racing raised the bar on cams and were the first ones with aggressive ramp rates and to push cams with more than 221* duration while many shops said it wasn't going to offer any benefits. MTI offered the B1 and T1 for a year or so and then TR came out with their grinds and were consistently putting out better numbers. IIRC, the XE-R lobes were not even out when TR started their grinds.
You just come accross hypocritical. You state things, I bring up good examples to you just let you see what you are saying is not true. But none of it is sticking for you.
Geoff:
Bowtie, I will show you some of the comments that I am talking about. I'll show you where you look dumb for saying something with no merrit behind it..
I would always trust Comp over a small shop.
How anyone could beleive that a small shop could come up with better lobes than Comp is beyond me.
My example was Elgin Cams.. They are a small shop. They are not a huge corporation like Comp Cams. Who puts out a better product?
Comp makes TR's Cams.
As for TR being a better product than Comp, remember who actually makes the cams.
Thunder might very well be a great shop but there cams are made by Comp.
Call Comp and see who makes their cams.
Have you taken your own advice and called comp? Or are you taking someone elses word for it that TR uses their lobes. If you did speak to comp, who was it?
Prove that the lobes are different than the XE high lift and prove that they are larger than the XE-R lobes.
Have you put all 3 / 224 cams in question on a cam doctor? Where are your “facts” coming from?
Ferocity,
I apologize some of us have hi-jacked your thread. See the comments from Geoff, Angie and Paul @ Thunder.. These are all people from Thunder that will have real info on their cams.
If so, PM or E-mail me the #'s on the back of the camshaft. What you'll see is either a Comp part # or the lobes that are used & the LSA the lobes are on. Send me the info on the back of your TR cam & I will tell you for sure what lobes they used for your cam. That ought to put this thread to rest.
Our cams were out close to a year before Comp released the XE /XER lobes.
Angie
Then they might not say you look like a jerk spreading false info.


