Considering a bigger header
#1
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ok, awhile back, I did a LS3 427 and tranny swap in my CETA. On the dyno, it made 508rwhp/480rwtq. Im happy with this setup. But, I was wondering if I was to go to 1 7/8s headers on this motor, how much of a rwhp/rwtq gain? If possible, I would like to get a good set of bigger headers that results in gains without compromising low end tq. Trying to decide which brand header should I run.
#3
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
would definately upgrade to 1 7/8 but can't speculate the amount of increase....maybe a conservative 15-ish? Plenty of torque with the 427...you wouldn't notice any low end loss, imo. might need another tweak in the tune too.
depending on budget, i would focus on ARH or Kooks and work your way down from there.
depending on budget, i would focus on ARH or Kooks and work your way down from there.
#4
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (20)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Id go 1 7/8s stepped to 2 at the minimum, if not 2 inches all the way. Texas speed tested their 1 3/4 against their 1 7/8s on a stock LS1. The numbers up to 4K were the same but after that i believe the 1 7/8s picked up about 8 across the rest of the rev range. So if they will make that much of a difference on a stock 346, they will make a big improvement on your car
#6
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
would definately upgrade to 1 7/8 but can't speculate the amount of increase....maybe a conservative 15-ish? Plenty of torque with the 427...you wouldn't notice any low end loss, imo. might need another tweak in the tune too.
depending on budget, i would focus on ARH or Kooks and work your way down from there.
depending on budget, i would focus on ARH or Kooks and work your way down from there.
Id go 1 7/8s stepped to 2 at the minimum, if not 2 inches all the way. Texas speed tested their 1 3/4 against their 1 7/8s on a stock LS1. The numbers up to 4K were the same but after that i believe the 1 7/8s picked up about 8 across the rest of the rev range. So if they will make that much of a difference on a stock 346, they will make a big improvement on your car
Yea I thought it would benefit my setup. After all, part of my build has the FAST intake 102/102 TB combo. So that should definately wake it up. What's kinda stopping me is the ground clearence. Right now, the SLP LTs fit pretty good with these redesign ones. I had them for two yrs. I wonder if my SLP catback will fit with the ARH or Kooks headers. If possible I would like to keep the catback. I have no desire to do the true dual setup.
#7
On The Tree
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mid Michigan
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Id go 1 7/8s stepped to 2 at the minimum, if not 2 inches all the way. Texas speed tested their 1 3/4 against their 1 7/8s on a stock LS1. The numbers up to 4K were the same but after that i believe the 1 7/8s picked up about 8 across the rest of the rev range. So if they will make that much of a difference on a stock 346, they will make a big improvement on your car
Anyone know how this size header fits with the stock f-body K-member? Any clearance issues etc?
Trending Topics
#8
12 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I do believe that the stock k member needs to be notched a bit, I too will be running a 2in on my 416 build but thank goodness I got that k-member in already.
CETA you got an awesome build! I think 2in FTW
and you'll REALLY need a diff upgrade then ![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
Then when the budget allows get that FAST 102 you'll have a beast then LOL
CETA you got an awesome build! I think 2in FTW
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
Then when the budget allows get that FAST 102 you'll have a beast then LOL
#9
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I do believe that the stock k member needs to be notched a bit, I too will be running a 2in on my 416 build but thank goodness I got that k-member in already.
CETA you got an awesome build! I think 2in FTW
and you'll REALLY need a diff upgrade then ![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
Then when the budget allows get that FAST 102 you'll have a beast then LOL
CETA you got an awesome build! I think 2in FTW
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
Then when the budget allows get that FAST 102 you'll have a beast then LOL
#13
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was thinking of getting them sometime in Jan. I'm trying to decide on kooks or ARH. I got the ARH catalog recently and they advertised their headers put down anywhere from 30rwhp to about 40 maybe 45rwhp and about 45rwtq. So anyone else seen the ARH catalog?