PAC-1211X vs PAC-1518 - LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

Generation IV External Engine LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PAC-1211X vs PAC-1518

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-29-2012, 07:06 PM   #1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 11
Default PAC-1211X vs PAC-1518

This is the spring my installer and builder are recommending I get. I had a sponsor do a custom cam spec and they recommended at 231/238 .598/.585 with HUC/XE lobes. 6600 shift and 6800 limiter in my LS3 build.

I know the defacto standard on beehive seems to be 1518, but how do you think the 1211x compres to the 1518?
Randell is offline   Reply With Quote

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cam/valve spring compatibility question - Custom grind cam/pac-1904 SilV8 Generation III Internal Engine 1 02-07-2016 09:51 PM
New PAC 1335 Spring Ari G Parts Classifieds 3 02-12-2015 12:51 AM
Questions about ls1 valvetrain before I purchase cajundragger Generation III Internal Engine 4 11-18-2014 10:45 AM
Can I use these?? springer_4 Generation III Internal Engine 7 06-17-2014 03:59 PM
New PAC springs serpentnoir Generation IV Internal Engine 12 01-07-2011 11:33 AM

1211, 1211x, 1518, beehive, ls1, ls1tech, ls7, pac, pac1211x, pac1518, pac5167, review, spring, springs, tech

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 AM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Your question will be posted in: