Stock LS2 Intake vs Dorman LS2
2005 5.3 LH6 Block
799 heads milled .010" with light hand touchup work
Summit Racing Stage 3 LS Cam (231/242 113+3, .600/.600 Lift)
.048 Head Gasket
Long Tube headers
Is it worth getting a Dorman LS2 intake over a stock LS2 intake? I haven't been able to find a good back to back comparison, especially for a smaller 5.3L.
There is a massive flow data thread in the Gen 3 section (you're actually asking a gen 3 engine question) that goes through which intakes flow the best by restricting the heads the least. https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...sxrt-more.html
The Dorman LS2 intake incorporated some of the FAST design work and outperformed the LS6 intake, almost as good as the TBSS intake. Jump to post 674 for the list from worst to best.
Dorman LS2 much better.
The LS6 intake out flows and makes more horsepower NA than the LS2 intake. The Dorman LS2 intake flows more than a stock LS6.
In a NA application the Dorman LS2 should out perform the stock LS2. I seem to recall reading Dorman even up some effort into making sure the Dorman LS2 was better than the stock LS2.







