Generation IV External Engine LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why does the 6.0 get crap fuel mileage?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2019 | 02:10 PM
  #21  
dreadpirateroberts's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 648
Likes: 72
Default

Originally Posted by skylark
I like the little truck.
i want to build something like that, but i have no time and no room.

that is a nice vehicle.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2019 | 02:15 PM
  #22  
dreadpirateroberts's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 648
Likes: 72
Default

as far as gas mileage goes, weight, gearing, drivetrain efficiency, and drag are the biggest factors i think. I got 30mph with my 5.7L blue-pill with lean cruise enabled at about 55 mph. High 20's shouldn't be out of the ordinary for any LS-powered car.

my 4.3L vortec blazer-wannabe struggles to get 20 on the highway. it's also as areodynamic as the side of a barndoor. i often wonder why i can't get better mileage, but see how high the average MPG's shoot up when i draft a semi (yeah, i know i shouldn't be riding this close...) and that confirms my suspicions. it's because it's a massive lego block with wheels.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2019 | 06:57 PM
  #23  
wannafbody's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 1,138
From: Pittsburgh
Default

This is overly simplistic, but think of the cylinder as a jar. As the size of the jar increases, to fill it takes more air and more fuel, assuming the air/fuel ratio is the same in both jars. Weight of the vehicle, trans and gearing play a role as well.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2019 | 07:22 PM
  #24  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,287
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by wannafbody
This is overly simplistic, but think of the cylinder as a jar. As the size of the jar increases, to fill it takes more air and more fuel, assuming the air/fuel ratio is the same in both jars. Weight of the vehicle, trans and gearing play a role as well.
A 6.0 is only 12% larger than a 5.3, but many of them use proportionately more gas, and in most of those is because they are-
a) pushing a heavier 3/4 ton truck,
b) operating with lower (higher numeric) rear gears (like 3.73 or 4.11), and
c) running a 4L80 trans that uses more power
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 08:13 AM
  #25  
cam's Avatar
cam
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,389
Likes: 67
From: in the garage
Default

Originally Posted by skylark
After reading all 34 pages of that thread over several days, I've come to the conclusion that in my s10 with a t56 and my 3.42 gears it won't kill me if I make the following changes. Compression; the LS2 and LS3 have 10.9 and 10.7 for their ratio. I need to be there. Cam; I need an appropriate cam - I'm not going for power but driveability and 2 more cylinders will do that. Electric fans; I was planning on that anyway. A legitimate tune; a canned "power" tune isn't going to suit my goals. Realistically my setup isn't far from an LS2 powered GTO, the weight, gearing, transmission and tire size are almost identical.
Now I have to find the right pistons and cam.
This is what I suggest. Priced well, stock stall friendly, will make a LOT more power than a stocker and if tuned up well should also improve fuel mileage. Best of all you can use the LS6/3 springs and keep your stock pushrods although Id suggest checking preload first and order new sized to fit moly pushrods. New valve seals and real delco LS7 lifters, rollmaster single chain ( i believe Summit brand are also rollmaster or at least they were ) or cloyes single also excellent chain. Maybe a fresh oil pump, etc. No need to break the bank but check things out and replace as nec.

https://www.summitracing.com/int/par...8719/overview/


Reply
Old Dec 12, 2019 | 04:24 PM
  #26  
00pooterSS's Avatar
TECH Veteran
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 531
From: Dallas
Default

6.0's don't get bad mileage, the vehicle they are usually in does though.

A 05 vette with an ls2 has no problem getting 30 mpg on the highway.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2021 | 02:37 PM
  #27  
skylark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 3
Default

My wife was due for another daily driver. She wanted V8, stick shift and something fun to drive that we could haul 4 people comfortably. She bought an 06 GTO with the LS2 and T56. So far we rebuilt the suspension and lowered it slightly, full Kooks exhaust, 1.8 full roller rockers, Duspeed CAI, Fast 102 intake, Nick Williams 103 and it was dyno tuned. The GTO is very similar in weight to my S10 and it gets 13-14 in town but on the freeway at 75 we're pulling down 24-25mpg.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2021 | 11:30 AM
  #28  
MuhThugga's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 322
From: Wilmington, De
Default

Keep in mind that the GTO does have aerodynamics on its side.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2021 | 11:05 AM
  #29  
Batass's Avatar
On The Tree
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 160
Likes: 7
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by skylark
My wife was due for another daily driver. She wanted V8, stick shift and something fun to drive that we could haul 4 people comfortably. She bought an 06 GTO with the LS2 and T56. So far we rebuilt the suspension and lowered it slightly, full Kooks exhaust, 1.8 full roller rockers, Duspeed CAI, Fast 102 intake, Nick Williams 103 and it was dyno tuned. The GTO is very similar in weight to my S10 and it gets 13-14 in town but on the freeway at 75 we're pulling down 24-25mpg.
This is why I bought a CTS-V. The 6.0 in the trucks get so poor mpg mostly due to the safe factory tuning. Overly rich, overly retarded and 4.10 gears doesn't help. I bested 13 stock with my Lq4, and ended up with 16-18 after lots of tuning. No engine mods. In real world the new trucks get about the same. I don't know where the EPA gets their numbers from. Haven't seen 22mpg on anything except the V6. The Ford gets about the same with all its extra engine technology. It just takes a certain amount of power to move a big heavy brick down the road and power is fuel. I would say we are at about the extent of what we can do to a gas engine to increase its efficiency. VVT, DOD, OHC, efficient factory heads and exhaust, intakes, direct injection. How much have we gained from all that? 2 or 3 mpg? I'm not impressed. Power though is another story.......
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2021 | 12:58 PM
  #30  
cmysix's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 360
Likes: 26
From: Opelika Alabama
Default

6.0 LS2 498 to the tire I'm still getting 23 hwy
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2021 | 02:04 PM
  #31  
Batass's Avatar
On The Tree
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 160
Likes: 7
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by cmysix
6.0 LS2 498 to the tire I'm still getting 23 hwy
What trans and gears?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2021 | 07:21 AM
  #32  
cmysix's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 360
Likes: 26
From: Opelika Alabama
Default

2006 corvette mn6
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2021 | 10:49 AM
  #33  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,287
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

It's pretty clear that fuel economy-wise, it is more about the vehicle than the engine, engine being a 6.0 in all cases.
In a heavy, wind-pushing, low-geared, safely-rich tuned 3/4 ton truck, mileage WILL suck.
In a light, aerodynamically smooth, tall-geared and finely tuned Vette or GTO, mid to high twenties are likely.
Nothing unexpected here....
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2021 | 11:21 AM
  #34  
Kfxguy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 756
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by Batass
This is why I bought a CTS-V. The 6.0 in the trucks get so poor mpg mostly due to the safe factory tuning. Overly rich, overly retarded and 4.10 gears doesn't help. I bested 13 stock with my Lq4, and ended up with 16-18 after lots of tuning. No engine mods. In real world the new trucks get about the same. I don't know where the EPA gets their numbers from. Haven't seen 22mpg on anything except the V6. The Ford gets about the same with all its extra engine technology. It just takes a certain amount of power to move a big heavy brick down the road and power is fuel. I would say we are at about the extent of what we can do to a gas engine to increase its efficiency. VVT, DOD, OHC, efficient factory heads and exhaust, intakes, direct injection. How much have we gained from all that? 2 or 3 mpg? I'm not impressed. Power though is another story.......
My 2019 silverado averages 22-23 with mixed city driving and 28mpg on the highway. (4 door, 5.3 1500)
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM.