Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Rocker arm ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2017, 07:47 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Justin Adams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Rocker arm ratios

I can't find any threads that are making a whole lot of sense to me I guess. I'm going to be running a low lift cam. Am I going to gain anything by going with a different ratio rocker, or should I just keep my stocks and do the trunion upgrade?
Old 01-25-2017, 08:23 PM
  #2  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Yeah, the higher ratio rockers will probably be worth some power.
Old 01-25-2017, 08:37 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Justin Adams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
Yeah, the higher ratio rockers will probably be worth some power.
enough to be worth spending the extra $300? And probably just a 1.8 ratio? To be honest, I don't understand all of that stuff at all. I'm using a 224/230 .553/.547 111+2 cam with ls6 springs, and stock length pushrods. The other thing I was curious about, is if I have my heads shaved 0.015, does that affect the rockers and pushrods at all or is it not enough go really matter at the end of the day?
Old 01-26-2017, 07:54 AM
  #4  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by Justin Adams
enough to be worth spending the extra $300? And probably just a 1.8 ratio? To be honest, I don't understand all of that stuff at all. I'm using a 224/230 .553/.547 111+2 cam with ls6 springs, and stock length pushrods. The other thing I was curious about, is if I have my heads shaved 0.015, does that affect the rockers and pushrods at all or is it not enough go really matter at the end of the day?
It's your money, I can't tell you if it's worth it or not.

Compared to OEM rockers, there are several advantages to using a roller tipped rocker. Not just a higher ratio. If you want a lot of lift (.640"+) or if your heads have bronze guides, you would really want to consider a rocker with a roller tip to reduce guide and valve wear. If you have a solid lifter or a short travel hydraulic lifter, you would want to consider an adjustable roller rocker so you can make fine preload/lash adjustments.

Shaving the heads .015" will probably increase the preload in the lifter with the same length pushrod. Depending where your preload is now, you might want a shorter pushrod.
Old 01-26-2017, 09:13 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,809
Received 203 Likes on 143 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

you will need different valve springs if you add 1.8 rockers...LS6's will not be enough. The lift will increase to roughly .595 .590 with 1.8's.
Old 01-27-2017, 10:00 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
dreadpirateroberts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 648
Received 72 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

I would be concerned with the extra weight over the valvestem vs. stock rockers when making a valvespring selection as well, not just the extra lift.

And honestly, i wouldn't use the blue springs on anything but a stock cam.

Everytime you change a cam or mill or swap on different heads, or use a different thickness gasket, always check for proper preload.



Quick Reply: Rocker arm ratios



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 PM.