View Poll Results: 370 or 408
370
6
19.35%
408
25
80.65%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll
370 vs 408
408 for me. Why make a high reving engine with the 92 heads they make great torque use them to ur advantage. I would watch how much compression you run with the 92's. There are debates on some sites about them being sensitive to comp. and detonation. I think you can get there with a hyd roller. The heads won't support real high lifts ,again debated on other sites. These are truck heads after all.
I believe them. Why would GM go with the LS7 heads if these would have done the job. I'm just a saying.
Then again why not try a high comp., high rev, soild roller and prove them wrong. Do you think the Vic jr will support this build? I would use a flat plate type t. body with a large elbow and have it run like a 5.0 with the filter pick up by the fender. Good luck keep use informed.
I wanted to go this way but backed off and went more street oriented. My cam is in the 240-250 range at .620 ish lift hyd roller.
I believe them. Why would GM go with the LS7 heads if these would have done the job. I'm just a saying.
Then again why not try a high comp., high rev, soild roller and prove them wrong. Do you think the Vic jr will support this build? I would use a flat plate type t. body with a large elbow and have it run like a 5.0 with the filter pick up by the fender. Good luck keep use informed.
I wanted to go this way but backed off and went more street oriented. My cam is in the 240-250 range at .620 ish lift hyd roller.
