Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Thinking of going smaller on cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2010, 04:47 AM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
lstvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Thinking of going smaller on cam?

My engine is shunting on low rpm, 1200-1800rpm, it is down to the cam i am sure, how much lower can you go without substantially cutting down the power. cam spec in sig. Cheers Paul.
Old 05-05-2010, 07:44 AM
  #2  
cam
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Once you crest 230 on duration the low speed problems start up. Some tuners can work magic and minimize the disturbance but thats a pretty safe bet. 230 or less on duration ( @.500 of course ) and its streetable, any bigger and it becomes more painful but will make more power up top ( typically )

I suppose the question you really need to ask yourself is what do you want the car for? If its for go fast only then suffer with it. If its a street car that you want to go fast in but have civil manners then change it.
Old 05-05-2010, 11:05 AM
  #3  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
STAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That's a big cam for for your displacement! What is the LSA on that cam? Overlap is what causes low speed bucking or surging which is big duration and/or tight lobe separation. I'm guessing your cam has over 22° of overlap at .50 and that is your problem. Some tuners are better than others at smoothing out the low rpms, but it takes a lot of time and you can only do so much. Speed density would be the way to go for best results.
I bet you can swap out the cam to something smaller and only loose a few hp right at the top. Speak with a knowlegable cam designer and discuss your concerns and he should be able to pick a cam to suit your needs.

BTW, I noticed you have 3.08 gears. By going to a 3.73 or 4.10 that will move your rpms higher at lower speeds and might get you out of the bucking range.
Old 05-05-2010, 11:12 AM
  #4  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
lstvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by STAR
That's a big cam for for your displacement! What is the LSA on that cam? Overlap is what causes low speed bucking or surging which is big duration and/or tight lobe separation. I'm guessing your cam has over 22° of overlap at .50 and that is your problem. Some tuners are better than others at smoothing out the low rpms, but it takes a lot of time and you can only do so much. Speed density would be the way to go for best results.
I bet you can swap out the cam to something smaller and only loose a few hp right at the top. Speak with a knowlegable cam designer and discuss your concerns and he should be able to pick a cam to suit your needs.

BTW, I noticed you have 3.08 gears. By going to a 3.73 or 4.10 that will move your rpms higher at lower speeds and might get you out of the bucking range.
The 3.08 really suits the car, as soon as you are above 2k, it runs lovely. I am thinking multiple Throttle Bodies, but it is loads of money.
Old 05-05-2010, 11:38 AM
  #5  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
STAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lstvr
The 3.08 really suits the car, as soon as you are above 2k, it runs lovely. I am thinking multiple Throttle Bodies, but it is loads of money.
A lower gear(numerically higher) will get you in your powerband faster. Big cams don't like spending time in the lower rpms...more gearing and higher compression will help. As for more throttle bodies I have read that they are difficult to set up and very expensive.
Who tunes your car? Speak with them and see if improvements can be made with the driveability. If not, a smaller cam would solve your concerns.
Old 05-05-2010, 02:44 PM
  #6  
TECH Resident
 
someday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: here, ny
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

whats the compression on the motor? 65cc chambers makes it sound a bit low... i'd take about 10 degrees out of the cam and move to a 3.50 gear...
Old 05-05-2010, 03:35 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
 
Jimbo1367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,816
Received 583 Likes on 461 Posts

Default

Old 05-05-2010, 05:54 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
lstvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Car is at 11.5:1 comp ratio, hardly low. The car cruises nicely at 90mph on that gearing. Besides around town i could select a lower gear to up the revs, but its on coast down and tiny throttle settings is where it shunts. Its called cross over i believe, where the big overlap causes it to breath its own fumes with a plenum chamber. Hence the thinking of going TB's. I reckon thats the direction i am goung to head so i can have it all...i hope.
Old 05-05-2010, 06:21 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (36)
 
davidws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Overlap

+1 for overlap causing the low rpm troubles. ITB's would be a way out but $$ or Pounds !

I'd like to try em myself but ITB's under a 4th gen f body hood ? = Prolly NOT.....
Old 05-05-2010, 11:40 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Jimbo'sZO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Your cam is not to big for a 416. You need more gear, (3.42 or 3.73) and need to find another tuner. The cam in my 416 is similar to yours but has more overlap, (27*), and driveability is not much of an issue for me. The tuner who did my street tuning spent alot of time with me driving around and making lots of minor adjustments to the idle air, throttle cracker and low rpm fuel trims. Don't give up on it yet, the right tuner will get it to behave much better.

Jimbo
Old 05-06-2010, 09:12 AM
  #11  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
lstvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Well.. i bit the bullet and found some 55mm Kinslers that are pre used, of a Mosler race car, and bought them, i'll let you guys know how i get on!
Old 05-06-2010, 03:31 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
 
ringram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sunny London, UK
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Alpha-n tune!?
Old 05-06-2010, 03:38 PM
  #13  
Trunion King
iTrader: (16)
 
bene's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texan in Colorado
Posts: 4,394
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Off topic:

It's nice to see some muscle heads in England.
Old 05-06-2010, 05:11 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (36)
 
davidws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts

Default ITB's

Used ones... Nice. Let us know how they work out ! When you get them installed, Please post the height of them from the Valley cover to the top.....

Birmingham UK, I was there in March 2004 for 2 weeks while I was working in Italy for my company. For a yankee, it was a different place. The brew was good ! Then I went to Edinbrugh for 2 weeks. That was a different world. When the gals talked that northern accent, it sounded So Sexy....
Old 05-06-2010, 06:08 PM
  #15  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Why don't you put the cam you had in before this one? As I recall, you liked the overall performance and it was smaller.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 05-06-2010, 06:14 PM
  #16  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
lstvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
Why don't you put the cam you had in before this one? As I recall, you liked the overall performance and it was smaller.
Too late as i have sold it, and the TB's were too good to miss, and the 70rwhp this cam gave me cant be missed!!
Old 05-06-2010, 07:29 PM
  #17  
TECH Regular
 
Bring the Noise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Arlington, TN
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If the TKO 5spd has stock gears then the 3.08 rear is just fine for that light a car (2600 lbs is a nice race weight).

If you go with the ITB setup then make sure you have a good tuner for your ECU and get the part throttle optimized (kinda goes without saying).

For others that are wondering about the gearing below is a comparison of a stock 99 T56 gears -vs- a TKO 600.

‘99 F-Body T56 Gear listing.
1st - 2.66, 2nd - 1.78, 3rd - 1.30, 4th - 1.00, 5th - 0.74, 6th - 0.50, and reverse 2.90

TKO-600 5spd manual
1st - 2.87, 2nd - 1.89, 3rd - 1.28, 4th - 1.00, 5th - 0.64, and reverse 3.00



Quick Reply: Thinking of going smaller on cam?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56 AM.