Stock L76 longblock...TSP or TR TruTorq?
So TSP has some nice cams...
225/230 .617/.612 111,112, or 113 LSA
229/236 .624/.615 111,112, or 113 LSA
231/239 .641/.615 111,112, or 113 LSA
I had read somewhere that someone tested them and got like 6 hp less from the small vs the large but gained down low. Sounds good to me and easier on springs.
I also noticed that Thunder Racing has some nice claims on their TruTorq Level 5 cam
227/239 .614/.621 115 LSA
They got 481rwhp/434rwtq on a 2010 Camaro SS w/ headers only through the TR6060 (I have the TR6060 as well)
It seems that the TR cam may be the better choice with lower lift (longer spring life) but then again some of you may have some useful info before I drop some $$ on a cam.
Thanks!
Jason
Last edited by LSxChevelle; Mar 1, 2012 at 08:54 PM.
Nobody spends anywhere near the time developing & testing camshafts like TSP. Here's a pic of the engine dyno while cam testing was going on:
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com


