Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

427 lsx need head options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2012, 09:21 PM
  #21  
TECH Enthusiast
 
COPO9560's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Look up Camster's thread on his new car. Puts down over 640 rwhp through an auto with MAST LS7 heads. Kind of hard to argue with his success.

Considering what a full 427 build is going to cost, I would not make your head decision based solely on what intake you currently own.
Old 04-29-2012, 09:32 PM
  #22  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
bandito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I already own the shortblock. My ls1 has the intake. I'm already 9k into this project.
Old 04-29-2012, 10:31 PM
  #23  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
litle88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Burbank, Illinois
Posts: 2,561
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Do you have a FAST 102 cathedral intake?

And you don't want another head except a cathedral head? Am I understanding you correctly?
Old 04-29-2012, 10:53 PM
  #24  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
bandito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, I might as well make do with what I have. Gm hightech had an article on cathedral vs rectangular and it looks like cathedral is best for mid range.
Old 04-29-2012, 11:52 PM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
My6speedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Salisbury, NC
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Look up Brian Tooley's 454 thread or some of Tony Mamo's thread's they are both full of information about cathedral port heads. Pick one and get a custom cam.

If I was in your shoes I would go with cathedral port heads. I like what I've seen regarding their builds. The choice is yours which way you want to go, but I say cathedral port all the way more over if you already have a cathedral FAST.

Is this a street car? A little more info might be useful. The midrange from a properly set-up big cube cathedral port motor will be an absolute street monster.

Better have a nice suspension and tires
Old 04-30-2012, 12:08 AM
  #26  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
bandito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1 drive it around 3 days out of the week and I usually race once a month at the track. I think the cam I got is good for cathedrals.
Old 05-04-2012, 10:28 PM
  #27  
TECH Apprentice
 
STROKER R/T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: toronto
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ws602
Allpros ls7 retro or the dash-1 head would be a great choice call Richard at w.c.c.h
ohhhhh yaaa now your talking all pro wcch !!
Old 05-05-2012, 12:14 AM
  #28  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
jimbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by My6speedZ
I didn't want to be the one to say it.... but yeah I feel the same way.
Then you guys have seen some pretty shitty combos...... I have built two combos with there heads that have done quite nicely... One with there 2.5 heads on a 402. 10.7 to 1 compression, 9 inch rear with 3.40ish gearing, 28 inch tall tires (not an optimal combo thru the lights). Full weight show camaro that ran 10.90 first time at the track (2500 DA). No AFR, timing or shift point adjustments.... Second run spinnnn... Now an easy 10.70 car with adjustments and newly regeared...

Second combo makes 607 rwhp thru a 4l80e tranny and 12 bolt...expecting 620 now with higher flowing cat converters and vacuum pump. That's about as good as it gets with out mechaical roller and Single plain manifold (50 more) easy with those two.... That again is heavy rotating auto, not a manual car with stock rear end...

I've seen a lot of shitty combos with all the head manufactures. Most issues were overcamming and to low of compression to work correctly as an effective air pump...


LS7 style heads....Mast, WCCH, All Pro, PRC. Cath heads try... Mast (11 degree stuff), Trick Flow, AFR, PRC...

Last edited by jimbob; 05-05-2012 at 12:37 AM.
Old 05-07-2012, 01:09 AM
  #29  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
obZidian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Miami, Fl.
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If budget is not an issue....

Rect. Port Intake (Single), LS7 Heads (AI's, MAST, ALL-Pro), Big TB and TUNE.
Old 05-07-2012, 05:57 AM
  #30  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
bandito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think I might just go 245cc AFR.
Old 05-07-2012, 11:48 AM
  #31  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bandito
I think I might just go 245cc AFR.
An out of the box AFR 245 would work great.....

Turn key 350+ CFM head with a reasonable cross sectional area will produce a really good looking power and torque curve.

If the budget permits and your looking for more I could help you with a "Mamofied" version of that head that flows close to 370 CFM's. Its a one off piece I do by hand obviously with an aftermarket lighter valve, custom valvejob, and hand massaged to completely optimize the port, new valvejob, and chamber design.

Same head I ran on my "Vader" build which produced one of the highest normally aspirated numbers I have seen thru a FAST intake which of course was fully ported and I would want to help you with that as well if you were thinking of going this route. Without a really good intake, you wont tap into the full potential of this cylinder head.

Bottom line, like others have mentioned, a really good cathedral set-up will make similar peak power as a really good square port set-up, but have a much fatter and much flatter torque curve as well, and the part throttle stuff on the street is noticeably stronger with the cathedral design.....some of that due to the longer runner length in that style manifold, not just the smaller CSA of the actual intake ports.

PM me if you have any questions or want to learn a little bit more about what Im suggesting.

This is build I was referring to above in the event you hadn't seen it yet with the reworked AFR 245's

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...ker-ready.html

Thanks,
Tony



Quick Reply: 427 lsx need head options



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.