Cathedral or Square Port heads for 408 stroker
Engine is Going to be a 408 stroker with 9:5 or 10:1 compression with twin 67s...Planning on making 1000+whp...Just want the right head for my setup/goal. Thanks guys.
LOL!! I'm assuming the 235 head is based off the 230 V2 head but only better I would imagine. In all motor form those heads are awesome I can only imagine what two turbos would only do. You right Tony haven't posted any results on the 235 head. Otherwise how many cars (I'm not a turbo guy) talking n/a... you see driving to track and running 10s on motor on both street tires/drag tires? Not many at all. Afr heads gets that done which is what Tony castings are.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Here is two good threads here... show me another f body that does the same as the two cars here below that's not stripped to hell and back.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-results/1772832-videos-bangin-gears-pulling-wheels-into-10s-my-all-motor-m6-ws-6-a.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1372582-402-afr-205-s.html
Engine is Going to be a 408 stroker with 9:5 or 10:1 compression with twin 67s...Planning on making 1000+whp...Just want the right head for my setup/goal. Thanks guys.
Aftermarket head is the way to go for numerous reasons IMO.....deck thickness/casting integrity for more reliability holding a head gasket and a much better exhaust port. With a turbo that's more important than the intake and another reason a really good cathedral would likely make as much power as a square port head with a higher flowing intake port (but the cathedral would be alot more responsive part throttle). All the square port stuff has the exhaust pushed into the chamber wall to make room for the large intake valve compromising some exhaust flow which is more important in any forced induction application.
My new MMS 235's have a phenomenal exhaust port right out of the box and I am also going to offer a nitrous/boosted version as well with an even larger exhaust valve and more flow (this version of the head is being catered specifically to a boosted combination).
If you have an interest shoot me a phone call or an email/PM (email better....just make mention of this thread).
If you prefer a square port I could sell you a ported TFS 255 head but the exhaust port wouldn't be quite as good as the product I just mentioned as there is no room for a larger valve and the architecture/layout of the head favors the intake valve as I also previously highlighted. BUT....if your set on square port I can work some magic on the TFS castings.....been doing alot of them for the CTSV crowd which of course is also a boosted application (positive displacement deal).
Let me know if I can be of some help
Regards,
Tony
PS....The "real world" results of the MMS 235's are coming soon.....LOL (I have a half a dozen or so rolling out the door now). Un-Mamofied, with 340-345 CFM on tap and 260+ exhaust in a modest sized port, the torque and power curve will be very strong and the low midrange responsiveness off the hook.

www.mamomotorsports.com
Tony@MamoMotorsports.com
Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Build it right the first time....its alot cheaper than building it twice!!
What I think is your best option at this point is most likely the PRC 260 LS3 head. The reason for that is simple. A 380cfm cylinder head that from the start comes with a nice hollow stem valve for better valve train control. When dealing with boost & aggressive camshafts the advantages of a hollow stem valve cannot be overlooked!!

http://www.texas-speed.com/p-4010-pr...der-heads.aspx
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com







that's the best!! Real world results don't lie! 





