LS1,2 or 3 for new engine? - LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

LS1,2 or 3 for new engine?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2017, 11:00 AM   #1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 117
Default LS1,2 or 3 for new engine?

I have a 2000 WS6 with the LS1...It currently has a mild cam, long tubes, ORY, egr delete etc and a 3k stall...Im at 141k on the odo and my oil psi is becoming an issue...its down to 10-12 at a stop, and 35 on the road...Im weighing my options on rebuilding or replacing. No matter which route I take, I do plan on installing a nice set of heads and better intake. I can get a LS1 short block pretty cheap or jump up to a 2 or 3 sb...My goal is to be mid 11`s....Would there be that much performance gain going from a 6.0 to a 6.2? Im sure going to either of those would be a decent jump from the 5.7...If I stayed with the LS1, I think it would be more cost effective to get a short block than having my block rebuilt with a rotating assembly...The heads I have sort of looked at are the PRC 2.5 for all the options...Just wanted to get some direction on which would be the best route to go, to get me to my mid 11 goal and still have a reliable car to drive on trips etc...
chevyss2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2017, 04:42 PM   #2
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Posts: 1,281

My .02 always go with the Largest Bore combined with the best
Cylinder heads that one can afford. That said I would rather
have a 6.0 block with a set of MMS 235s than a 6.2 with some
so-so or even "good" heads. The better heads MMS 235s in this
example will make more HP with better throttle response and
have better drivability with a smaller cam. More ideal for a
daily driver and reliability.
NAVYBLUE210 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2017, 09:10 PM   #3
Staging Lane
140K_GXP's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 74

I would go with the LS3. It is a 6.2L and has the much better flowing heads and intake.
140K_GXP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2017, 04:59 PM   #4
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 117

As stated above, the heads will more than likely be PRC 2.5 heads using a LS6 or Fast 92 intake...I would much rather have a 3, but just to throw the extra $ at one just to be able to say I have a 6.2 isn't something I want to do if the 6.0 is comparable with the same set up on heads and intake..
chevyss2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2017, 12:02 PM   #5
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 117

Have decided to go ahead with the LS3 from Thompson Motorsports....They had the best price on them...My son wants to buy my LS1 for a project engine for something he is going to build...So it all worked out pretty good..
chevyss2008 is offline   Reply With Quote

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbo upgrade time suggestions cosbysweater Forced Induction 10 09-12-2017 01:38 PM
Block Choice? Ls1,2, 3? chevyss2008 Generation III Internal Engine 55 03-14-2017 09:18 PM
Opinions on new build mjs1012 Generation III Internal Engine 1 07-16-2016 11:31 PM
newbie with head questions. Silverado2469 Generation III Internal Engine 15 03-29-2016 02:27 PM

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 PM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Your question will be posted in: