DeStroked LS7 anyone?!?




With stock LS3s +12-16* Exhaust Duration.
Aftermarket LS3s +6-10* Exhaust Duration.
7500+ Rpm, LLSR Ideal.
Trending Topics
Great article and both GM and SAM used huge spread at 0.050 to make great Power... 233/276 and SAM used 258/276 with class limited lift of .641 by SAM great article
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
IMO even stock ls3 heads will work decent on a 388 at that RPM. Just don't use a stock ls3 intake. The harmonics are wrong for what you're doing
Aftermarket LS3s +6-10* Exhaust Duration.
7500+ Rpm, LLSR Ideal.
So don't tell me the splits are too big or LSA is wrong. Tell me what valve events you would change.
A48 degree IVC and a 60 degree EVO will give you a 12 degree split unless you seriously bias the overlap to the intake side, which is a bad idea on a ls3 design head. Those valve events support high rpm. You bring the EVO later, you end up restricting the ability to carry past peak.
I understand that he(Firehawkls7) has the crank & block yet you do know the formula for this Huge gain also compared to what.
HP = Torque x RPM ÷ 5252. So bigger is better and a larger cam takes care of the RPM so an even better gain in HP. Without as many RPM's as a(Screamer!!!)
Not hating just wanna make Sure We all stay on the same page for facts. And that it's cool to build something that differs from the Norm.
Last edited by Patron; May 18, 2017 at 06:45 AM.
HP = Torque x RPM ÷ 5252. So bigger is better and a larger cam takes care of the RPM so an even better gain in HP. Without as many RPM's as a(Screamer!!!)
Not hating just wanna make Sure We all stay on the same page for facts. And that it's cool to build something that differs from the Norm.
Look at a 383 vs 346. 383 tends to peak earlier and fall off faster vs 346. Same concept here, except the bore is so much larger you're giving up less torque vs what you gain in shifting peak power higher AND carrying past peak.
Maybe another comparison is look at the destroked LS7 388 vs the stroked LS1 383. You can do so much better on the heads with that 4.125" bore 388, lower parasitic losses, etc.
The main downfall is losing nearly 40 cubic inches as that will be around 50rwtq less all across the board like others have said. If you aren't going to run a single plane LS3 intake or similar that will take advantage of higher RPMs and a solid roller cam... there is no real advantage to putting that combo together. Above the 7500rpm range is when the stock oiling system also can create issues.... due to the gerator style oil pump. Kurt Urban informed me of that.
If you need an LS7 crank/Ti rods I have some for sale in the classifieds...... wet and dry sump style crank.
Last edited by Patron; May 18, 2017 at 02:56 PM.
GNX I know you know. So lets say you take the 388, so what would it take to make 700 @ the RW . We've got J.B. and it told or said it all, how much RPM Would it Take to make 700 @ the rear with the 388 Big bore/short stroke. Oh BTW the MSD and Fast don't like that much rpm to make the Avg larger crank # Or even a 6.6. Do you know of EMC it's Avg's not just PEAK and still wanting the most out of any Combination. I'm still looking for a Sponsor for a Lsx Dr/Ct head combo that's what makes this Funny with a Killer mid flow for a smaller bore size. And we are talking about VE seriously VE. qoute: from Allen Iverson on not making practice.
HP = Torque x RPM ÷ 5252. so what's missing with the VE?
Last edited by Patron; May 18, 2017 at 05:40 PM.
No dyno time yet if I tell you what I have in a Lq you would be Stupid to think I can't get what I Want Or Have. 750 plus @ THE CRANK OR I'LL BURN IT WITH FACTORY LS3 Heads. So a 388 big bore 8-- fwhp I'm doing that with factory blocks and LS7 heads YOU or any one Else can't have. 1 off's. TFS/mast or AFR mean Nothing to me.I just hit that Mark or get that # or $
Last edited by Patron; May 19, 2017 at 12:00 AM.




