Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Lsx454

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2021, 11:12 AM
  #21  
Banned
 
Corona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,984
Received 680 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

700 to 750 crank hp NA only needs roughly 408 to 427 ci using a 6.0 or Ls3 block with around 75 to 7600 rpm. All based on Pump gas. 454 will do the same with less rpm and higher budget starting with the Lsx block.
$2k+ for the block and around $1000+ for machine work.
The following 2 users liked this post by Corona:
G Atsma (03-01-2021), KW Baraka (03-13-2021)
Old 03-01-2021, 11:15 AM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
spanks13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,252
Received 480 Likes on 310 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
Iirc the 454 also uses ls7 heads?
Uses the as cast LSX-LS7 head which is 6 bolt and is a casted version of the CNC production port. Also thicker in the casting and also in the deck surface I think.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (03-01-2021)
Old 03-01-2021, 11:28 AM
  #23  
Banned
 
Corona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,984
Received 680 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

Perfect example 740 fwhp
https://www.yellowbullet.com/threads...sults.1204610/
Old 03-01-2021, 11:53 AM
  #24  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
rkupon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bayville,NJ
Posts: 2,011
Received 750 Likes on 407 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LaBLKv6Z
Check out redbaronlsx454 on Youtube. He's had the 454 LSX in his car for a long time and been kicking *** with it from what I've seen on his channel.

https://www.youtube.com/user/redbaronprodutions/videos
That guys video is what made me NOT order up a 454lsx. Watch the video with a 40mph roll on on NT05DRs. Barely got out of its own way...imho. That thing shooda laid down dual fat burnout marks! It didnt even look like it spun. I simply wasnt impressed.
Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
Iirc the 454 also uses ls7 heads?
Yea, aftermarket tho. Not the factory ls7 s that come on the 570 wet sump set up.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (03-01-2021)
Old 03-01-2021, 12:41 PM
  #25  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 945 Likes on 701 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rkupon1
They all seem underwhelming to me. I was seriously considering one too til i noticed one thing in common in every youtube video, not a single one lights up the tires on a roll on. Why?
Originally Posted by rkupon1
That guys video is what made me NOT order up a 454lsx. Watch the video with a 40mph roll on on NT05DRs. Barely got out of its own way...imho. That thing shooda laid down dual fat burnout marks! It didnt even look like it spun. I simply wasnt impressed.
Basing a whole series of engines on one cars results doesn't make much sense. I went from a LS2 w/LS3 heads Maggie 1900 to an LSX454, it made more torque, almost same power, and was faster. Had ZERO issue turning 28x10.5/15's to smoke! I had a TH400 with 3.7 gear behind it. I did an SD tune with an LS7 Vic Jr on top. The LSX454 made a good bit more power than my MAST 416, fancy heads, higher compression engine did that cost about the same all said and done.
Old 03-01-2021, 12:52 PM
  #26  
Banned
 
Corona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,984
Received 680 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN
Basing a whole series of engines on one cars results doesn't make much sense. I went from a LS2 w/LS3 heads Maggie 1900 to an LSX454, it made more torque, almost same power, and was faster. Had ZERO issue turning 28x10.5/15's to smoke! I had a TH400 with 3.7 gear behind it. I did an SD tune with an LS7 Vic Jr on top. The LSX454 made a good bit more power than my MAST 416, fancy heads, higher compression engine did that cost about the same all said and done.
👇
Size (Lives) Matter 🤣



Rpm (being) Needed and the amount of Tq needed is generally the best way to go about things

Your car/truck weight + gear/trans are a Dead giveaway and it's Usage 😉
Old 03-01-2021, 02:18 PM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
LaBLKv6Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 1,330
Received 210 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rkupon1
That guys video is what made me NOT order up a 454lsx. Watch the video with a 40mph roll on on NT05DRs. Barely got out of its own way...imho. That thing shooda laid down dual fat burnout marks! It didnt even look like it spun. I simply wasnt impressed.
https://youtu.be/rLeXbgcORsY
I'll agree to disagree, car rolled out hard and put the power down. No telling what clutch, rear gears, or if it did spin judging from the quality of the video. His build thread below.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/appearanc...on-lsx454.html
The following 2 users liked this post by LaBLKv6Z:
Kingc8r (03-01-2021), War Prayer (03-01-2021)
Old 03-01-2021, 02:21 PM
  #28  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
rkupon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bayville,NJ
Posts: 2,011
Received 750 Likes on 407 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN
Basing a whole series of engines on one cars results doesn't make much sense. I went from a LS2 w/LS3 heads Maggie 1900 to an LSX454, it made more torque, almost same power, and was faster. Had ZERO issue turning 28x10.5/15's to smoke! I had a TH400 with 3.7 gear behind it. I did an SD tune with an LS7 Vic Jr on top. The LSX454 made a good bit more power than my MAST 416, fancy heads, higher compression engine did that cost about the same all said and done.
And that means what compared to the vids "I" saw? You didnt really state much in your arguements. Just more "opinions". Like saying ID injectors arent worth the money or any better than Bosch 210s. That is your opinion n your experiance. Im all about comparing stuff, but itd be nice if you used more specific info. My comment was in response to the guy qouting the Red Baron as "kicking ***". Im sure the lsx454 is a nice set up. But "in my honest opinion" its typically underwhelming. For whatever reason. I was strongly considering buying one for my car.
Old 03-01-2021, 02:34 PM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
spanks13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,252
Received 480 Likes on 310 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rkupon1
And that means what compared to the vids "I" saw? You didnt really state much in your arguements. Just more "opinions". Like saying ID injectors arent worth the money or any better than Bosch 210s. That is your opinion n your experiance. Im all about comparing stuff, but itd be nice if you used more specific info. My comment was in response to the guy qouting the Red Baron as "kicking ***". Im sure the lsx454 is a nice set up. But "in my honest opinion" its typically underwhelming. For whatever reason. I was strongly considering buying one for my car.

I would not call his car underwhelming but hard to judge from a highway roll-on. It is a 9 second car that doesn't appear to be a flyweight running 6.20's in the 1/8.

For a drop in and go crate engine the LSX454 is a pretty good piece. It can be better with some massaging but all that's really needed is a cam and intake swap for 700hp. Rated at low 600's with a stock ls7 intake, stock ls7 throttle body, and a 236* intake lobe peaking at only 6200 rpm. Put an MSD intake or single plane and something like a 250/266 on 113-114 cam in it and it'd fly on pump gas. If you don't mind taking the heads off then clip the heads to 12:1 compression for 93 octane and let it rip. The weight is the biggest concern...well, and I personally hate the orange paint lol.

The following users liked this post:
War Prayer (03-01-2021)
Old 03-01-2021, 03:03 PM
  #30  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
rkupon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bayville,NJ
Posts: 2,011
Received 750 Likes on 407 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by spanks13
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlCB...redbaronlsx454

I would not call his car underwhelming but hard to judge from a highway roll-on. It is a 9 second car that doesn't appear to be a flyweight running 6.20's in the 1/8.

For a drop in and go crate engine the LSX454 is a pretty good piece. It can be better with some massaging but all that's really needed is a cam and intake swap for 700hp. Rated at low 600's with a stock ls7 intake, stock ls7 throttle body, and a 236* intake lobe peaking at only 6200 rpm. Put an MSD intake or single plane and something like a 250/266 on 113-114 cam in it and it'd fly on pump gas. If you don't mind taking the heads off then clip the heads to 12:1 compression for 93 octane and let it rip. The weight is the biggest concern...well, and I personally hate the orange paint lol.
Its not what id want for 620 hp. That is underwhelming imho for 454ci. Yes, it serves a purpose as is. Post #3, I was thinkn same thing you are. I get that, hence why I almost bought one. But once you get into pulling heads n changing a bunch of stuff, or building it from scratch, theres really no reason to use it as is. OP said he was gunna build it himself and wants SC ls3 numbers. That to me, takes the crate motor out of the equation. I could be wrong, and I wont argue that. But with all the above mentioned variables, it seems less n less like a good fit for his plan. Bottom end maybe, but he gunna need some top end and induction to get after his goals. More than one way to skin a cat im aware. I have no doubt dudes car is/was evolving at the track. But a roll on is a roll on. And Id expect a built 454lsx to burn them nittos down from 40mph. He claimed in the video he was testing the tires, so i m lead to believe he wasnt in 6th gear messing around, or limping it on a break in tune. Also, that is not the only video I ve ever seen of a 454lsx. Im just saying, that one didnt impress me. Lotsa variables im sure.

Last edited by rkupon1; 03-01-2021 at 03:20 PM.
Old 03-01-2021, 03:37 PM
  #31  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 945 Likes on 701 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rkupon1
And that means what compared to the vids "I" saw? You didnt really state much in your arguements. Just more "opinions". Like saying ID injectors arent worth the money or any better than Bosch 210s. That is your opinion n your experiance. Im all about comparing stuff, but itd be nice if you used more specific info. My comment was in response to the guy qouting the Red Baron as "kicking ***". Im sure the lsx454 is a nice set up. But "in my honest opinion" its typically underwhelming. For whatever reason. I was strongly considering buying one for my car.
Because it wasn't an argument, it was a statement based on my experience. Not sure what is underwhelming about them, but maybe you are used to running 8's NA with a similar setup, different people are used to different things. In my case I sold the cam/bolton/blower combo I had that ran low 10's and picked up the LSX for about the same price. It worked for what it was, walked plenty of blower cars, then I sold it and moved on to turbos.

If you want ID 2000 or 2600 or whatever they sell go buy them and be happy, I don't care as you aren't spending my money. When people offer me their cash/credit card to build a car I try to get them the biggest bang for the buck. Some guys just want expensive parts so they can brag at cars and coffee, that's not my scene.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (03-01-2021)
Old 03-01-2021, 03:42 PM
  #32  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 945 Likes on 701 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Corona
👇
Size (Lives) Matter 🤣

Rpm (being) Needed and the amount of Tq needed is generally the best way to go about things

Your car/truck weight + gear/trans are a Dead giveaway and it's Usage 😉
Not sure what that means, mine was in a family car that was ~3800-3900lbs. I revved it to ~7600 and ran 1 7/8" headers to dual 3" exhaust so it wasn't annoying. I beat the crap out of it and never had an issue. That engine ended up getting turbo'd and now is going in a car with a 2.9 whipple on top of it.
Old 03-01-2021, 05:35 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
Corona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,984
Received 680 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN
Not sure what that means, mine was in a family car that was ~3800-3900lbs. I revved it to ~7600 and ran 1 7/8" headers to dual 3" exhaust so it wasn't annoying. I beat the crap out of it and never had an issue. That engine ended up getting turbo'd and now is going in a car with a 2.9 whipple on top of it.
You said :
I went from a LS2 w/LS3 heads Maggie 1900 to an LSX454, it made more torque, almost same power, and was faster. Had ZERO issue turning 28x10.5/15's to smoke! I had a TH400 with 3.7 gear behind it. I did an SD tune with an LS7 Vic Jr on top. The LSX454 made a good bit more power than my MAST 416, fancy heads, higher compression engine did that cost about the same all said and done...
All Different engine builds Same 3800 lbs car. Blower Helped with the Weight vs the 416 having less Tq, the 454 Helped with tq. IDK if the 454 had SC or Turbo TQ but the added .125 crank stroke Helped. Besides the bigger Bore.

That said, the Guys asking for SC Ls3 numbers..
650+ fwhp & 600 ftlbs of TQ.
😑

​​​​
Old 03-01-2021, 09:19 PM
  #34  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 945 Likes on 701 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Corona
All Different engine builds Same 3800 lbs car. Blower Helped with the Weight vs the 416 having less Tq, the 454 Helped with tq. IDK if the 454 had SC or Turbo TQ but the added .125 crank stroke Helped. Besides the bigger Bore.

That said, the Guys asking for SC Ls3 numbers..
650+ fwhp & 600 ftlbs of TQ.
😑

​​​​
When you add in the weight of the blower, heat exchanger, water, belt parasitic loss, IAT rise, etc, vs the iron LSX vs the aluminum 416, it gets a bit complicated. The blower was closer to 4000lbs, and the 416 closer to 3750lbs.

That said, 650fwhp and 600lb/ft is pretty easy to achieve by any means, that's only 555whp/510wtq. I've seen well built SBE NA LS3's close in on 500whp. In my car 450hp ran 11.3, 600hp ran 10.3 if that helps the computation at all.
Old 03-02-2021, 02:10 AM
  #35  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Mickyinks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 743
Received 238 Likes on 160 Posts
Default

I have a built lsx, 1st go round was with ported ls3 heads , ls3 intake , 239/254 btr cam, that made 540rwhp.
Then went to mamo ls7 heads and msd intake 255/269 solid roller cam and it makes 675rwhp, itll light up the street tyres at 70mph. I drive it every day, tow big loads, ill spin it to 7400rpm every time i get in it
a supercharged ls3 weighs more than the lsx once all add ons are done... i really didnt notice much difference with the extra weight in my car
When i pulled the engine down for upgrade i did notice the piston skirts had a bit of wear but nothing id really worry about plus i dont think the builder specced pistons correctly..
Im happy i built mine and id do it again if going NA
The following users liked this post:
LaBLKv6Z (03-02-2021)
Old 03-02-2021, 05:54 PM
  #36  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
F me's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Well I would say that these replies answer my question...I am going to plan an LSX build. If I fall a little short of power a 100-150 shot of nitrous should do it with no ill affects on the forged bottom end.
Old 03-02-2021, 08:07 PM
  #37  
TECH Fanatic
 
TTur1996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,268
Received 162 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

I'm not sure if you realize that the GM LSX block needs a **** load of machine work and will end up costing a lot more than a Dart Pro Iron skirted Next block. The Dart is all around a much better piece too.
Old 03-03-2021, 07:54 AM
  #38  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
F me's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TTur1996
I'm not sure if you realize that the GM LSX block needs a **** load of machine work and will end up costing a lot more than a Dart Pro Iron skirted Next block. The Dart is all around a much better piece too.
Please read the description. According to this maybe some decking...
https://www.gmperformancemotor.com/parts/19417353.html
Attached Files
File Type: html
19417353.html (54.0 KB, 92 views)
Old 03-03-2021, 09:39 AM
  #39  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 945 Likes on 701 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TTur1996
I'm not sure if you realize that the GM LSX block needs a **** load of machine work and will end up costing a lot more than a Dart Pro Iron skirted Next block. The Dart is all around a much better piece too.
I wasnt aware DART offered crate long blocks, or we no longer talking about the LSX 454? I agree DART is a solid platform if building from scratch, but $3k for a block is some hooch!

Originally Posted by F me
Please read the description. According to this maybe some decking...
https://www.gmperformancemotor.com/parts/19417353.html
$3800 for a bare block is steep when you can get the whole long block with warranty for $9k.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (03-03-2021)
Old 03-03-2021, 11:28 AM
  #40  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
rkupon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bayville,NJ
Posts: 2,011
Received 750 Likes on 407 Posts

Default

No warranty once he takes it apart or modifies it, so thats out. Also said he wanted to assemble it himself, so why start out with a crate motor under warranty? Between thst n the hp rating he s looking for, i still dont see why he s considering the lsx454. Maybe I missed something. Mickyinks kinda proved my point, he loved his, but it had very little in common with the GM crate motor the OP was asking about. Can you buy the GM 454lsx as a built bottom end shortblock? If so, than thats a pretty good start as your top end options are limitless. Not to mention the lack of wait time for a custom shortblock. This thread is all over the place.

One guy on here once said, GM builds the best motors. I totally get that. If the motor meets your goals, sure is a no brainer
If one more builder wasted my time on the phone, i was ordering the 454lsx or the 570hp wet sump LS7 n throwing my intake on it. I would have been driving my car already n lovn it. But I no doubt made a mountain out of a mole hill n went full custom...again...
At some point, you have to decide what you really want!

Last edited by rkupon1; 03-03-2021 at 11:33 AM.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (03-03-2021)


Quick Reply: Lsx454



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 AM.