Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

5.1L build and tech thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2023 | 03:52 PM
  #1  
TLWiltman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 5
Likes: 3
From: Shelton, WA
Default 5.1L build and tech thread

Hi All,
I'm starting this as a build thread for an engine in progress. The purpose of this is to gain information and, eventually, to share results. Also, because this a little bit of a unique application, information that is specifically helpful is rather scattered and hard to come by (the LS world is a little bit of an odd duck, but we'll maybe get to that). My hope is that if anyone decides to do something similar, this will be A playbook (not THE playbook) that can lead to success.

Application: I am building a '73 Camaro for SCCA autocross. This CAN be a bit of a "run what you brung" class, but there are some strange weight breaks. There is no maximum cubic inch limit, but there is a practical limit on how much power is useful in the lower (1st and 2nd) gears. There is, however, a 300 pound weight break for V8 engines AOB 5100cc (311.221 cubic inches). This weight break is impactful during acceleration, braking, cornering, and tire wear. This is not, and will never be, a street car. At a minimum weight of 2700 pounds, this car will be fully gutted. Most other engine specs are unlimited, although cylinder heads must fall into the realm of "high performance versions of stock-type cylinder heads (OEM or aftermarket).

The induction side of this is pretty well squared away, with few unanswered questions. Tony@Mamomotorsports is helping me quite a bit with this part.
-MMS 205 heads with 55cc chambers. Hand finished by the man himself with Manley springs (200# on the seat)
-Mamofied FAST LSXRT
-Matching Yella Terra 1.8 ratio adjustable rockers
-Custom spec solid roller cam. We haven't gotten into the weeds on this yet, but mid-240s @.050 and ~.700 lift is in the ballpark. We have a goal/estimate of around 1.85 hp/ci (~575 FWHP). I'd like to see ~1.38-1.42 ft-lbs/ci.

ATI damper and dry sump system is going to be a must in order to help this little guy live. The 3-stage systems can be made to fit with the stock subframe crossmember (as required to take full advantage of the weight break. Aftermarket subframe is 150# penalty as of 2023 rule book)

The short block is... where I have the most questions. I have one 5.3 aluminum block, and a second on the way. Both are the vaunted 048 castings. Sonic testing on the one I have bears out the rumor that a 3.9 bore is plenty achievable. Crankshaft availability is frustrating at best. It boggles my mind that I'm stuck with either a cast 4.8 crank (I'm going to need some convincing to make a cast crank even slightly okay), or a nearly $4000 crank ($3765 from Callies). There is ZERO middle ground here, and it bothers me a lot. Peak power is likely to fall into the 73-7500rpm range, with some overrun capability to ~8000 (only if course configuration requires). While do have a short block complete at this point, I've learned some things along the way. I am, to put a long story short, starting over.

Lessons learned, leading to engineering questions:
-Washington State isn't exactly a hotbed of the high performance industry. Finding a machine shop that doesn't refuse to even deck my block has been a struggle. Why? The answer is that 99.9% of the machine shops here in this state haven't gotten much past the 1970's, and claim issues with surface finish due to smeared iron filings or an inability to get the decks square. I've finally managed to find TWO shops (within 200 miles) that have a CNC machine with fixturing capability AND the ability to machine an aluminum block with the proper finish. One of them pretty much doesn't want, or need the work from a non-regular customer. So it looks like I go to Portland.
-I'm going to need custom pistons for this deal. First is the oddbball 3.893 bore size. Second is the thin ring package I'll need to make this work (looking into a 1.0/1.0/2.0 or a .9/.9/2.0 ring package. Those will also have to be custom due to the aforementioned oddball bore size).
-The rods I originally purchased were too heavy (660g), as was the piston package (610g for piston and pin). This led to an 1869g bobweight. I need to do better.
-We're going to have to figure out at which point compression ratio and dome height begin to cancel each other out in terms of power production. This is a race fuel/E85/E98 type of engine, so detonation isn't a huge concern. Combustion efficiency, thermal efficiency, and volumetric efficiency ARE huge concerns. It's going to take a 9cc dome to get to 13:1, 12cc to get to 13.5.
-So, just how strong IS a 4.8 crank? I've heard some pretty high power figures, but torque tolerance MAY be different than toleration high-RPM N/A?

Let's have a discussion on this. I may have some gross conceptual errors that need correcting. A few caveats... N/A is required. Any blend of gasoline and/or ethanol are allowed. No methanol anywhere in the system (no water-meth injection for example). Also no nitrous. Displacement is fixed. I lose my weight break at any displacement above 5100cc (5100.01 is a no-go. Let's not figure out the hard way how accurately the SCCA can measure displacement, or what their methods are in the case of a protest). A higher-displacement track-day engine is a separate conversation (probably much simpler TBH)

Thank you all. I will post updates as this goes forward

Tad

Last edited by TLWiltman; Jan 8, 2023 at 12:36 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2023 | 07:01 PM
  #2  
Kawboom's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 532
Likes: 630
Default

This sounds like a good time, and I think you can do something worthwhile in this venture.

The 5.3 blocks are good. I wouldn't worry too much about getting every last cubic inch, but if you need an oddball bore size you can get pistons and rings with a phone call or email. The stock LS1 bore size is 3.89, the 4.8 stroke is 3.267, thats 310ci on the nose.

The cast 4.8 crank is strong, very strong, taking 1000hp without issue. You will need to have everything balanced, though.

Good luck.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2023 | 08:29 PM
  #3  
DualQuadDave's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 622
Default

Originally Posted by TLWiltman
Hi All,
I'm starting this as a build thread for an engine in progress. The purpose of this is to gain information and, eventually, to share results. Also, because this a little bit of a unique application, information that is specifically helpful is rather scattered and hard to come by (the LS world is a little bit of an odd duck, but we'll maybe get to that). My hope is that if anyone decides to do something similar, this will be A playbook (not THE playbook) that can lead to success.

Application: I am building a '73 Camaro for SCCA autocross. This CAN be a bit of a "run what you brung" class, but there are some strange weight breaks. There is no maximum cubic inch limit, but there is a practical limit on how much power is useful in the lower (1st and 2nd) gears. There is, however, a 300 pound weight break for V8 engines AOB 5100cc (311.221 cubic inches). This weight break is impactful during acceleration, braking, cornering, and tire wear. This is not, and will never be, a street car. At a minimum weight of 2700 pounds, this car will be fully gutted. Most other engine specs are unlimited, although cylinder heads must fall into the realm of "high performance versions of stock-type cylinder heads (OEM or aftermarket).

The induction side of this is pretty well squared away, with few unanswered questions. Tony Mamo is helping me quite a bit with this part.
-MMS 205 heads with 55cc chambers. Hand finished by the man himself with Manley springs (200# on the seat)
-Mamofied FAST LSXRT
-Matching Yella Terra 1.8 ratio adjustable rockers
-Custom spec solid roller cam. We haven't gotten into the weeds on this yet, but mid-240s @.050 and ~.700 lift is in the ballpark. We have a goal/estimate of around 1.85 hp/ci (~575 FWHP). I'd like to see ~1.38-1.42 ft-lbs/ci.

ATI damper and dry sump system is going to be a must in order to help this little guy live. The 3-stage systems can be made to fit with the stock subframe crossmember (as required to take full advantage of the weight break. Aftermarket subframe is 150# penalty as of 2023 rule book)

The short block is... where I have the most questions. I have one 5.3 aluminum block, and a second on the way. Both are the vaunted 048 castings. Sonic testing on the one I have bears out the rumor that a 3.9 bore is plenty achievable. Crankshaft availability is frustrating at best. It boggles my mind that I'm stuck with either a cast 4.8 crank (I'm going to need some convincing to make a cast crank even slightly okay), or a nearly $4000 crank ($3765 from Callies). There is ZERO middle ground here, and it bothers me a lot. Peak power is likely to fall into the 73-7500rpm range, with some overrun capability to ~8000 (only if course configuration requires). While do have a short block complete at this point, I've learned some things along the way. I am, to put a long story short, starting over.

Lessons learned, leading to engineering questions:
-Washington State isn't exactly a hotbed of the high performance industry. Finding a machine shop that doesn't refuse to even deck my block has been a struggle. Why? The answer is that 99.9% of the machine shops here in this state haven't gotten much past the 1970's, and claim issues with surface finish due to smeared iron filings or an inability to get the decks square. I've finally managed to find TWO shops (within 200 miles) that have a CNC machine with fixturing capability AND the ability to machine an aluminum block with the proper finish. One of them pretty much doesn't want, or need the work from a non-regular customer. So it looks like I go to Portland.
-I'm going to need custom pistons for this deal. First is the oddbball 3.893 bore size. Second is the thin ring package I'll need to make this work (looking into a 1.0/1.0/2.0 or a .9/.9/2.0 ring package. Those will also have to be custom due to the aforementioned oddball bore size).
-The rods I originally purchased were too heavy (660g), as was the piston package (610g for piston and pin). This led to an 1869g bobweight. I need to do better.
-We're going to have to figure out at which point compression ratio and dome height begin to cancel each other out in terms of power production. This is a race fuel/E85/E98 type of engine, so detonation isn't a huge concern. Combustion efficiency, thermal efficiency, and volumetric efficiency ARE huge concerns. It's going to take a 9cc dome to get to 13:1, 12cc to get to 13.5.
-So, just how strong IS a 4.8 crank? I've heard some pretty high power figures, but torque tolerance MAY be different than toleration high-RPM N/A?

Let's have a discussion on this. I may have some gross conceptual errors that need correcting. A few caveats... N/A is required. Any blend of gasoline and/or ethanol are allowed. No methanol anywhere in the system (no water-meth injection for example). Also no nitrous. Displacement is fixed. I lose my weight break at any displacement above 5100cc (5100.01 is a no-go. Let's not figure out the hard way how accurately the SCCA can measure displacement, or what their methods are in the case of a protest). A higher-displacement track-day engine is a separate conversation (probably much simpler TBH)

Thank you all. I will post updates as this goes forward

Tad
I like what you are doing. Should be a rules book killer combo. Be prepared for year after this runs. if you are super successful. to have the weight break taken away. On the rotating assembly, if you already have rods/pistons, I would run what you have and not chase the superlight bobweight. If anything, maybe call Rebco and have him lighten your pistons, that would be money well spent. For rotating weight, I would take it all off the flywheel/clutch set-up which will be way more effective overall. Also, if the bore size gets weird, don't count on custom rings. Custom rings are even harder/longer to get than custom pistons these days. I would shoot for an E85 build and crank the compression to moon(14:1 or more) however you are able to get the compression up. Stock crankshaft should be fine for a while, just inspect it every now and then to make sure nothing is "starting to happen" heat/crankwise. A good ATI balancer will make it live a lot longer, as well. Exhaust will be key, as well, maybe a tri-y or a stepped header to build the torque thoughout the powerband. If you do end up looking for a lighter rod, look at the Carillo A beams, I believe they are the lightest per the strength. Also, maybe look at a Comp LSXHR Intake, just as an option. I know Tony loves those LSXRT intakes and he does them very well, but I would imagine the LSXHR may be slightly better overall from the straighter runner path, 9in long runners and better plenum. It'll fit if the LSXRT fits your car.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2023 | 07:23 AM
  #4  
Woodylyf767's Avatar
TECH Regular
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 430
Likes: 135
From: Ohio
Default

I would ask an expert what type of balance you should be shooting for. You may want to over balance
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2023 | 02:04 PM
  #5  
70CutSupreme's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 3
Likes: 1
Default Youtube Video

Richard Holdner just released a new video you might want to watch. Seems to be close enough to what you're trying to do.


Reply
Old Jan 11, 2023 | 05:16 PM
  #6  
bthomas's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 642
Likes: 241
Default

I wouldn’t worry about a stock crank in your application at all.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2023 | 05:29 PM
  #7  
n2xlr8n66's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 352
Likes: 151
From: Gadsden
Default

For what you are trying to do, I'd be more concerned about balancing, oiling system and valvetrain than a stock cast crankshaft.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2023 | 07:25 PM
  #8  
Che70velle's Avatar
ModSquad
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,865
Likes: 5,224
From: Dawsonville Ga.
Default

I had a great opportunity to grab a Bryant billet 3.25” stroke crank this past summer for $250. It was used of course, but was super low mile. Came out of one of the LS9 Prototype engines ran in 24 hour races. I didn’t want anything else piling up on the shop, and I figured no one would ever want it. Having said that, an OEM 4.8 crank is plenty strong for for what your doing. Because of its shorter arm, it’s actually the strongest cast LS crank available. No worries there for your use.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

10 Reasons Daily Driving a Swap Project SUCKS! (& 1 Reason to Do It Anyway)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

6 Gifts Neither Your Dad Nor Grad Will Shove Into the 'Trinket Drawer'

 Brett Foote
story-2

Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-7

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-9

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
Old Jan 31, 2023 | 07:51 PM
  #9  
grubinski's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 648
Likes: 581
From: Carnation, WA
Default

Cool build. I used to autocross a lot in the Seattle area. Subscribed. 👍
Reply
Old May 24, 2023 | 12:42 PM
  #10  
DavidBoren's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 123
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

What ever happened to this? I am always looking for MMS205 results.

And why go through all the effort of custom/wierd piston and ring sizes? You could just offset grind a stock crank... pretty sure you could get to 3.45" using either a 4.8 or 5.3 crank cut down to Honda journals.
3.78" bore × 3.45" stroke = 309.73ci (5.1L)
3.40" gives you ~305ci (5.0L), if you must be under 5.1L... sure, the bigger bore will breath a little better, but you could get there just by changing the stroke.

Granted, if you are having trouble finding a machine shop that will deck an aluminum block, you probably won't find one that will offset grind a crankshaft. Lol.
Reply
Old May 24, 2023 | 03:27 PM
  #11  
Black98Z28M6's Avatar
Teching In
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22
Likes: 3
From: Snohomish, WA
Thumbs up I wish it wasn't so.......

Originally Posted by TLWiltman
Hi All,

Lessons learned, leading to engineering questions:
-Washington State isn't exactly a hotbed of the high performance industry. Finding a machine shop that doesn't refuse to even deck my block has been a struggle. Why? The answer is that 99.9% of the machine shops here in this state haven't gotten much past the 1970's, and claim issues with surface finish due to smeared iron filings or an inability to get the decks square. I've finally managed to find TWO shops (within 200 miles) that have a CNC machine with fixturing capability AND the ability to machine an aluminum block with the proper finish. One of them pretty much doesn't want, or need the work from a non-regular customer. So it looks like I go to Portland.

This is, unfortunately, pretty much the truth for Washington State. I had a hard time over the years getting anything done, as far a machining goes, in Western Washington. It has not gotten better over the years either. Only worse. I have been lucky that there has been one place near me that has done a good job with my stuff. I hesitate to say who it is because they do take their sweet time, and they are plenty busy.

I will be subscribing to this tread, looks very interesting.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2024 | 12:49 AM
  #12  
TLWiltman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 5
Likes: 3
From: Shelton, WA
Default

Finally, an update... it's been quite the saga. Some parts of it have been easier than others. The configuration is "set" enough to be able to go through that part of it. A small handful of things are still subject to optimization.

First issue. My luck with 5.3 blocks is completely atrocious. 1st block had a .025 defect/gouge in the #2 main saddle. After beginning assembly on that one... I just couldn't quite "sleep at night" with the lack of support behind the main bearing. Enter block #2. This block was sourced from a friend of a friend. After inspection, there was a gouge/defect near the parting line of the #2 main saddle that measured to be about .015 deep. This lead to block #3... this block had spun the #4 cam bearing. Fixable? Perhaps, but we'll get to why I didn't feel that was a great foundation in a bit.

The project went on temporary hold while I made some engineering decisions. One recommendation id recieved from the lifter manufacturer was that i would need to sleeve the lifter bores due to most used ls blocks having excessive clearances. When doing a mod like that, it became apparent that i needed to start with a rather pristine block, rather than what would amount to a one-time-use throwaway. After nearly a month plotting weights, making a spreadsheet for CG, and gathering weights and locations, I found that an iron block is doable. Soon, I was in possession of a brand-new LSX block. This single plan change... changed the whole build. Soon, the block, and a boatload of components, made their way to Action Machine in Shoreline, WA for probing and measurement in their CNC. Measurement revealed that the block would accept bores centered in blueprint locations at a minimum of 3.900. This made the build far more "racy". The components reflect this...

MMS 205 heads. These guys got the extra love from Tony. All of the transitions and tool path quirks inherent to all CNC heads are as smooth as a politician's lie. Assembled valve heights are perfect. Combustion chambers are milled to 54.5cc. That said, I haven't seen an official flow curve. Other modifications to the standard were hollow-stem intake valves (96 grams), 10mm rocker bolts and the Manley nextek spring upgrade (shimmed to 200# on the seat).

YT 10mm 1.8 rockers (adjustable). These did require some light handwork to the heads for rocker clearance, which was really simple. A dremel made quick work of this.

247/254@.050 camshaft 113+4 .693/.671. These are hybrid low-shock lobes. Compression >13:1 will help with mid-range torque. This is more exhaust split than Tony would normally do, but should help the power curve carry at the top-end.

We went with the MSD intake, ported by Tony. This gives me an 8.5" runner length (total, including the head, is ~14"). Power peak is projected to be around 7000-7100rpm. A lot of the work is in the area of the throttle body entry and in the removable runners. Theres a fair amount of taper in the runners, which start at around 4.5 in² at the bellmouth. This will also help with carrying the powerband upward.

Lifters are from Jesel. Tie-bar, dlc coated. Lifter bore sleeves are also from Jesel

Pistons (3.903x1.258) were designed by HorsePower Research and Wiseco. They did a 3d scan of the chamber, so should have no fitment issues at all. You can see where the double quench pad would have caused some issue with a shelf piston. They also came with an APGP 1/1/2 ring stack from total seal. These have a .165 dome. This is similar in design to their 12cc dome, but the valve reliefs are shrunk down radially given the 1.975/1.575 valves in the 205 head. We considered going to a piston-guided rod, but decided against that for this iteration.

Dailey dry sump. Absolute work of art! Dry sump solutions provided some great tech during the purchase. The ATI balancer came with the dry sump system, so this works together as it should.

Dyers rods, small-journal (2.000") 6.4 long. Weight on these came out to 630g, and they're hell-for stout.

The latest purchase, that I just sent out the deposit for, was for the crankshaft. After much research, it was actually Bryant Racing that had the best pricing. Jim was great, and answered every question I had. Stroke will be at 3.195, which gives me a max bore of 3.937. I have ring sets planned out for 3.907, 3.917, 3.927, and 3.937 before the bore diameter gods go into "no-mans-land mode". This gives me an initial displacement of just under 306cid. This is coming with center counterweights as well.

Clevite coated bearings, ARP head and main studs, and ARP fasteners are used throughout. I do have Katech oil squirters, but they are not being installed at this time. It looks as though I will have to take the block somewhere to have that done, but there's a debate on whether I need them at all.

At this point, this will be an overbuilt and understressed engine. Other than valve springs, lifter rebuilds, and eventual wear and tear... im curious as to how it will do as is, but there are a couple of potential areas to continue development. Camshaft, intake manifold, and exhaust... Cam timing on a deal like this... needs all the help it can get. I am also unsure whether a Carbon pTr intake will fit under the rules regulated 4" cowl hood. If so, there MAY be gains to be had there, along with alleviating some potential equipment interference. With exhaust, there's been a common theme that the 4.8-5.3 variants tend to be very insensitive to header primary diameter. One theory that I have heard, but have yet to test, is that the implication is that both 1.75 AND 1.875 header primaries are too big for the application. If able to have them made, a 1.625-1.75 step may work really well. If going to the trouble of a custom header, I may be able to have the tubes laid out to the collector such to allow a tri-y collector to be installed for packaging

so... why did I not stay with the 4.8 crank? At the end of the day, it was all about availability of good blocks, the mods i was needing to make to them to make the lifters live, and availability of rings in appropriate bore diameters (nothing available at 3.890). I was looking at having race-block money into a stock block... after some 100k+ miles of who knows what use case. Why not an AL block? Nobody makes one in the 3.9 bore size. $7000 block that I'd have to have sleeved wasn't in the cards this time. But, the search continues... the build continues... in about 6 months, I'll have the crank, which is the last component. The block gets out of machine shop jail... back to my own shop, and the real fit-up begins.

Last edited by TLWiltman; Sep 16, 2024 at 12:10 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2024 | 01:22 PM
  #13  
LS1Formulation's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 1,162
From: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Default

An LH6 aluminum block will easily take up to a 3.905" bore. It's also likely the strongest LS block outside of the rare 4.8/5.3/6.0 blocks that are only bored to 3.780". Siamesed bores and a lot of material around thick liners, it was my choice for my turbo build. You can find them in all of the Trailblazer clones, I got mine from a Saab 9-7x that I paid $500 for. Sold all the extra parts for a profit, and I only had $1300 into a bored, torque plate honed, decked, and align bored block that will easily handle 1000+ to the wheels.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2025 | 05:07 PM
  #14  
TLWiltman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 5
Likes: 3
From: Shelton, WA
Default

Bryant billet jewelry FTW
Bryant billet jewelry FTW
Holy domes, Batman!
Holy domes, Batman!
Long block compete and torqued
Long block compete and torqued
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2025 | 05:26 PM
  #15  
TLWiltman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 5
Likes: 3
From: Shelton, WA
Default

As seen above, I'm at a milestone here in the 360. The long block is complete (a couple of odds and ends like the rear cover and final torquing of the harmonic damper excepted). Final compression ratio maths out to 13.6:1, which should work great with E85. Injectors are FIC 650s, which would even work with E98 if so desired. There's a lot of hours of mocking up, measuring, adjusting, fussing, realizing I'd made a mistake somewhere, fixing or working around those mistakes (valve reliefs not deep enough, requiring a future re-design chief among those mistakes. This was a symptom of me not working close enough with the help I had... it made me better and more knowledgable in the end, but was highly annoying). The assembled short block rotated at ~7.8-8.2 ft-lbs, which seems pretty slick to me. More to come, as I need to pull the engine off the stand, put it on a different stand assembly, finish (rear cover, damper, valley cover, intake, etc)
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 AM.

story-0
10 Reasons Daily Driving a Swap Project SUCKS! (& 1 Reason to Do It Anyway)

Slideshow: 10 reasons daily-driving a swap project might not be for you. Or is it?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-17 09:39:05


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Gifts Neither Your Dad Nor Grad Will Shove Into the 'Trinket Drawer'

Don't get dad new socks or a grill brush this year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 14:55:56


VIEW MORE
story-2
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

Slideshow: We take a close look at the ONE and Artidiag 800BT2 diagnostic tools from Topdon and the reasons to buy one over the other.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-18 10:26:23


VIEW MORE
story-3
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

Slideshow: The controversial Ferrari F6 swaps its original flat-12 for a Corvette Z06-derived LT4 V8 and sends power to four rear wheels through a custom-built drivetrain.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-26 18:23:54


VIEW MORE
story-4
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

Slideshow:These GM engines didn't just make huge power, they survived abuse, boost, track days, and six-digit mileage with a reputation for refusing to quit.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-21 16:45:27


VIEW MORE
story-5
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-6
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-7
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE