Lifter differences on the dyno
Same for heads. He gets questions like, "what's the better head, X or Y??" He will show WHY head X with the small ports and chambers can be better than larger, better flowing ports and larger lower compression chambers.
You need to look at context.
He has no reason to skew any tests as there's nothing in it for him to gain by it.
Some tests are combos of previous tests on different engines, but he is careful to point out differences that affect the outcome, yet emphasize what the intended focus is.
A true apples to apples test isn't always feasible under the parameters he works under.
He doesn't do clickbait, or desire results different than those that result. He has no reason for either.
He has no reason to skew any tests as there's nothing in it for him to gain by it.
Some tests are combos of previous tests on different engines, but he is careful to point out differences that affect the outcome, yet emphasize what the intended focus is.
A true apples to apples test isn't always feasible under the parameters he works under.
He doesn't do clickbait, or desire results different than those that result. He has no reason for either.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Ever think about pushrods? The dyno hero of everyone here did a test on different length pushrods and found that longer makes more power up top. It's because oil in the lifter is more likely to be aeriated at high rpm. Longer pushrod leaves less space for oil.
I had a conversation with Brian Nutter, the engineer for Summit Pro LS cams and he was telling me how dirt track racers figured this out long ago. And since they are under strict rules and engine inspections someone figured out to put spacers in the stock lifters to take up some of the volume, and it did lead to power gains in the high rpm areas.










