LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion (https://ls1tech.com/forums/)
-   Generation IV Internal Engine (https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iv-internal-engine-80/)
-   -   L92's Came in (https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iv-internal-engine/585660-l92s-came.html)

Wnts2Go10O Oct 2, 2006 02:58 PM

L92's Came in
 
5 Attachment(s)
with pictures

Wnts2Go10O Oct 2, 2006 02:59 PM

2 Attachment(s)
a couple more

SStrokerAce Oct 2, 2006 03:09 PM

What you putting them on?

Bret

Wnts2Go10O Oct 2, 2006 03:10 PM


Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
What you putting them on?

Bret

6L with LS7 rockers and cam

gollum Oct 2, 2006 03:43 PM

I may be wrong, but I do not think LS7 rockers will work. LS7 has 11 degree valve angle, L92 has 15 degree. Will someone correct me if I am wrong?

LS7 rocker part # Int. 12579615 Exh. 12579617

L92 rocker part # Int. 12569167 Exh. 10214664

gollum Oct 2, 2006 04:43 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I like this shot. Notice how much straiter air flow path is (thanks to offset rockers and raised floor/roof port) compared to LS1,LS2, LS6 cathedral port.

The new 2008 Camaro is going to kick some major booty.

Wnts2Go10O Oct 2, 2006 05:10 PM


Originally Posted by gollum
I may be wrong, but I do not think LS7 rockers will work. LS7 has 11 degree valve angle, L92 has 15 degree. Will someone correct me if I am wrong?

LS7 rocker part # Int. 12579615 Exh. 12579617

L92 rocker part # Int. 12569167 Exh. 10214664

different part numbers because of the different ratios. other than that no ones told me anything else thats different. the degree of the heads i dont think would be an issue but pr length would.

gollum Oct 2, 2006 06:34 PM

Maybe I'm wrong, but I am pretty sure LS7 rockers will not work with L92 heads. I have seen a picture of LS7 rockers setting on these L92 heads, the rocker tip overhangs valve stem tip about 1/8 inch if I recall correctly.

WKMCD Oct 2, 2006 06:57 PM

Congrats...I tried to get some postable pics of mine but gave up.

We should have mine up and running in about 3 weeks...

Wnts2Go10O Oct 2, 2006 07:00 PM


Originally Posted by gollum
Maybe I'm wrong, but I am pretty sure LS7 rockers will not work with L92 heads. I have seen a picture of LS7 rockers setting on these L92 heads, the rocker tip overhangs valve stem tip about 1/8 inch if I recall correctly.

can ya find me that pic, itd be useful. :)

Beaflag VonRathburg Oct 2, 2006 07:02 PM


Originally Posted by gollum
I like this shot. Notice how much straiter air flow path is (thanks to offset rockers and raised floor/roof port) compared to LS1,LS2, LS6 cathedral port.

Yeah I was comparing these to a set of 243 castings I have in my room and they look majorly different. The raised roof design looks like it's going to rock. The only thing about them that I see as a slight draw back is the fact that the runners are so large. For the price though they are probably the best thing out now for stroker builds. Now all that's needed is the L76 or carb intake to come out.

WKMCD Oct 2, 2006 08:11 PM


Originally Posted by Beaflag VonRathburg
Yeah I was comparing these to a set of 243 castings I have in my room and they look majorly different. The raised roof design looks like it's going to rock. The only thing about them that I see as a slight draw back is the fact that the runners are so large. For the price though they are probably the best thing out now for stroker builds. Now all that's needed is the L76 or carb intake to come out.

I agree. The heads - STOCK - are very impressive. I have the L76 intake for the stroker...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:24 AM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands