Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

454ci from a LS7 block???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2007, 12:58 PM
  #21  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
2000_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Webb City, MO...out in the garage
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slow95z
am i the only person here that thinks the best option is to just hold out for the LSX block?

that's kinda what i was thinking, but i'm not in his shoes, so i dunno....personally i'd rather keep the alluminum block, but then again, that LSX is bad.....
Old 02-26-2007, 04:38 PM
  #22  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (16)
 
NoGamesLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
You can never have too much power!!!
Old 02-26-2007, 04:57 PM
  #23  
On The Tree
 
verve_v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kaleva, Michigan
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 2000_SS
that's kinda what i was thinking, but i'm not in his shoes, so i dunno....personally i'd rather keep the alluminum block, but then again, that LSX is bad.....
There's going to be an alluminum version of the new lsx block first and then an iron block a little later on i do believe.
Old 02-26-2007, 06:51 PM
  #24  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
BlackHawk T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by verve_v
There's going to be an alluminum version of the new lsx block first and then an iron block a little later on i do believe.
No. The LSX block being released is iron.

They are "talking" about doing an aluminum. That is all we know.
Old 02-26-2007, 08:26 PM
  #25  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (33)
 
slow95z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dublin Ga
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i personally would rather run an iron block but i guess its for 2 reason. 1st being that i always had iron back in the day and never had any trouble but i have busted about 4 aluminium blocks and second reason is that i love my power adders.
Old 02-26-2007, 11:53 PM
  #26  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
john_sblendorio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas / 427ci F1R 1,002 rwhp/928 rwtq
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

There have been a lot of people saying just go with a 427, but what makes that the magic number. I am relatively new to cars, but in the boat world displacement is king, besides the cost of going a little bigger is minor compared to the overall cost of the project. Why not squeeze every last CI out of the motor? Steve at R.E.D. mentioned that he can do a LS2 MID dry sleeve 4.2" bore x 4.25" stroke. Most people would say the car is fast enough - I guess I am not most people. My guess is most of the subscribers to this forum are not either. Still waiting to fund the project and may just go with a tall deck Warhawk. We are certainly living in an exciting time period when it comes to lsx development.
Old 02-27-2007, 05:13 AM
  #27  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by john_sblendorio
There have been a lot of people saying just go with a 427, but what makes that the magic number. I am relatively new to cars, but in the boat world displacement is king, besides the cost of going a little bigger is minor compared to the overall cost of the project. Why not squeeze every last CI out of the motor? Steve at R.E.D. mentioned that he can do a LS2 MID dry sleeve 4.2" bore x 4.25" stroke. Most people would say the car is fast enough - I guess I am not most people. My guess is most of the subscribers to this forum are not either. Still waiting to fund the project and may just go with a tall deck Warhawk. We are certainly living in an exciting time period when it comes to lsx development.
Well said!!
Old 02-27-2007, 09:14 AM
  #28  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by john_sblendorio
There have been a lot of people saying just go with a 427, but what makes that the magic number. I am relatively new to cars, but in the boat world displacement is king, besides the cost of going a little bigger is minor compared to the overall cost of the project. Why not squeeze every last CI out of the motor? Steve at R.E.D. mentioned that he can do a LS2 MID dry sleeve 4.2" bore x 4.25" stroke. Most people would say the car is fast enough - I guess I am not most people. My guess is most of the subscribers to this forum are not either. Still waiting to fund the project and may just go with a tall deck Warhawk. We are certainly living in an exciting time period when it comes to lsx development.
I'm with ya dude. Go big or go home. I would have gone bigger if it were avalible at the time. I ordered this block.
Old 02-27-2007, 09:33 AM
  #29  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (7)
 
Sharpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southeastern IL
Posts: 4,997
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by john_sblendorio
Why not squeeze every last CI out of the motor?
If it makes sense on your budget, then sure. If you're talking about going with a Warhawk (in a C6, no less), then I can imagne that you have a nearly limitless budget so you can both go for the biggest displacement and get the most out of every cube both at the same time.

What I was saying is don't follow "there's no replacement for displacement" in blind dogma. It's a wonderful guideline, but not some sort of a law of physics. It would really suck if a smaller displacement car blew your big-inch car away on the street, and he paid half as much, you know? Take a look at what people are doing in the dyno thread. You don't want a bigger-inch motor making less power than a smaller displacement engine is all I was saying.

You say you're new to cars, but recognize the wonderful things happening in the LSx world. Well, one of the great things is that some of the old ways of thinking are sometimes getting revised.

If you're honestly looking for the ultimate street car, I would talk with the sponsors like W2W. Tell 'em you have a fetish for big inches.


...Well, I don't know if that's exactly how I would word it, but....
Old 02-27-2007, 10:28 AM
  #30  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Nasty N8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 5,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Reason for smaller 427 is with smaller stroke you will be able to rev the motor. And RPM makes power as well and it will be far more reliable. And reason for not using the LSX block is it is going to be huge and will cause fitment issues in most cars the haeds will start running into things...

Nate
Old 02-28-2007, 07:09 PM
  #31  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve - Race Eng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oceanside, Ca.
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 132 Likes on 39 Posts

Default Bore size

If you are going to run a two or three hundred shot of nitrous, I would recommend 4.150" max. bore size on the dry liner. That will leave a thick enough sleeve so you don't end up with problems.

The MID sleeves are much stronger. You can run those out to 4.200" with nitrous.


Originally Posted by Quickin
Steve,

Did you say that 4.185 will be strong enough for N/A, but not if you're gonna spray it with say a 200 shot?


.
__________________
Steve Demirjian
Race Engine Development
Oceanside, Ca.
760-630-0450
web: www.raceenginedevelopment.com/
e-mail: race-engine-development@***.net
Old 02-28-2007, 08:53 PM
  #32  
TECH Veteran
 
Quickin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Posts: 4,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve - Race Eng
If you are going to run a two or three hundred shot of nitrous, I would recommend 4.150" max. bore size on the dry liner. That will leave a thick enough sleeve so you don't end up with problems.

The MID sleeves are much stronger. You can run those out to 4.200" with nitrous.
So an LS1 block, instead of using the LS2 or LS7 block, with the MID sleeves will be very strong with a 200 shot if you went:

4.200 bore and 4.200 stroke for a 466ci

or

4.200 bore and 4.100 stroke for a 454ci



.
Old 02-28-2007, 09:14 PM
  #33  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Quickin
So an LS1 block, instead of using the LS2 or LS7 block, with the MID sleeves will be very strong with a 200 shot if you went:

4.200 bore and 4.200 stroke for a 466ci

or

4.200 bore and 4.100 stroke for a 454ci



.
Yup! I think they may have even finished the LS2 MID, put don't quote me on that one.
Old 02-28-2007, 09:36 PM
  #34  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
09CPTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is the LSX the same as the LS7X Warhawk block, this one here... http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...k_head_review/ ? Cause that looks bad ***. But, from World Products it'll prolly cost north of $10k for the bare block.

Lol, wait, guess I don't know anything about block costs. They say it retails for $3999, and will support 454 cubes. That's deff. the one I would go with. Pricey as hell, but looking at that car, i'd guess this guy's got it.
Old 02-28-2007, 09:46 PM
  #35  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
52172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Buellton Ca
Posts: 3,489
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Quickin
So an LS1 block, instead of using the LS2 or LS7 block, with the MID sleeves will be very strong with a 200 shot if you went:

4.200 bore and 4.200 stroke for a 466ci

or

4.200 bore and 4.100 stroke for a 454ci



.
I talked with steve over bore with the new MID sleeves and he thought 4.185 would be best value since you are leaving enough material in the sleeves for a rebuild. Why spend 2500 on a block when you can NEVER rebuild it without spending another 2500? Seems like an logical reason to stay away from a 4.2 bore. If you care so much about the loss of .025 bore just buy the new iron LSX block which will go too 4.5 bore or somethin like that, but you add 100 somethin pounds to the ft. Or what about the new Dart billet block?
Old 02-28-2007, 10:55 PM
  #36  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve - Race Eng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oceanside, Ca.
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 132 Likes on 39 Posts

Default Ls2 Mid

Darton now has LS2 large bore MID sleeves in stock (4.175" to 4.200"). I have done a couple of them already. They will have an LS7 MID sleeve shortly which will go from 4.125" to 4.200". They will replace the current LS2 MID sleeves as they will work in both blocks.

I prefer the LS1 block for high nitrous or boosted MID installations because they have solid main webs and are much less susceptable to cracking between the cylinders than the LS6 block. In fact I have never seen a cracked MID LS1 block.

Steve


Originally Posted by Beast96Z
Yup! I think they may have even finished the LS2 MID, put don't quote me on that one.
__________________
Steve Demirjian
Race Engine Development
Oceanside, Ca.
760-630-0450
web: www.raceenginedevelopment.com/
e-mail: race-engine-development@***.net
Old 02-28-2007, 11:05 PM
  #37  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
52172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Buellton Ca
Posts: 3,489
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Steve what is the difference between the ls2 mid sleeve and the ls7 mid sleeve and are they both compatible with an ls1 block? Thanks
Old 03-01-2007, 12:09 AM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Chicago Crew UnderBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elmhurst, IL (Chicago Suburb)
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 09CPTN
Is the LSX the same as the LS7X Warhawk block, this one here... http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...k_head_review/ ? Cause that looks bad ***. But, from World Products it'll prolly cost north of $10k for the bare block.

Lol, wait, guess I don't know anything about block costs. They say it retails for $3999, and will support 454 cubes. That's deff. the one I would go with. Pricey as hell, but looking at that car, i'd guess this guy's got it.
NO, two completely different blocks with the LSX being a GM perf block (all iron) being offered by GM, and available next month, and Scroggey Dickey has them on sale for delievery in about a month or so for $1,995.00 for just the bare block. With this block 427 to 482 cubes is a no brianer with 454 cid making the most sense if you want big cubes and reliability (4.25 x 4.00 stroke). The WARHAWK block is an all alum. aftermarket big cubed LS series block now available (still tuff to get one as they are so new, etc) and are built by WORLD PRODUCTS (not GM like the LSX block and not iron like the LSX block). The LSX iron GM BLOCK is suppose to support HP up to 2000 to 2500 HP, perfect for those crazy minded F/I Folk who want to run as much boost as they possibly can thow at this motor which will be able to handle it!
Old 03-01-2007, 11:06 AM
  #39  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve - Race Eng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oceanside, Ca.
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 132 Likes on 39 Posts

Default Ls1 Ls2

The LS1 sleeve is different from the LS2 LS7 MID sleeve in seating depth. GM raised the floor of the coolant jacket about an inch on the LS2 and LS7 blocks. The two sleeves are the same overall length and dimension except for the seating dimension which has been shortened to work in the LS2 and LS7 blocks.

Steve



Originally Posted by 52172
Steve what is the difference between the ls2 mid sleeve and the ls7 mid sleeve and are they both compatible with an ls1 block? Thanks
__________________
Steve Demirjian
Race Engine Development
Oceanside, Ca.
760-630-0450
web: www.raceenginedevelopment.com/
e-mail: race-engine-development@***.net
Old 03-01-2007, 11:16 AM
  #40  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
52172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Buellton Ca
Posts: 3,489
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

thanks!


Quick Reply: 454ci from a LS7 block???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 PM.