Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

6 Bolt Block Comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2008 | 10:28 AM
  #1  
RAACCR's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 334
Likes: 1
Default 6 Bolt Block Comparison

Referencing this thread https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-induction/900436-ladies-like-em-thick.html

Considering that these are the blocks of choice for most max effort applications. And, without getting into a cheerleading competition, can we have an objective discussion comparing the ERL reworked LS2 blocks to the Warhawk and LSX? Obviously, the aluminum offerings are lighter. What about strength, availability, compatible cylinder head offerings, cylinder thickness/max bore, stroke capacity (considering clearance, deck height options, rod length and pin placement, etc.), legality for class racing, cost/value, and any other features/benefits that one might have over the others. Please try to keep it civil

Thanks,
Rob
Old 04-14-2008 | 10:31 AM
  #2  
stevegrizzle's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
From: FL
Default

Old 04-14-2008 | 01:09 PM
  #3  
needadvice's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Default

Besides weight savings with the aluminum block.....I think without argument the LSX GM iron block wins in every single category, including being A LOT cheaper. As long as its one of the good LSX blocks.

Unless the longer 5.800" Darton wet sleeves can be used in the aluminum blocks than the sleeve length of the LSX GM iron block also won't have the longest sleeves so strokes can't be too long.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42 AM.