Rating Summary
Options
From
Date
JRracing
10-29-2007, 11:14 PM
The block ended up being a 97 block instead of a 2001 like the ad said. When in fact if you did not know, you should have listed the block ID #'s so people could look them up to see what year it was. Instead of listing it as a 2001.
So you misrepresented the block due to ignorance or flat out lied about it.
The rest of the rotating assembly was as you said except for the rings missing to the diamond pistons with cheap hastings in place of them.
But all in all it was still an OK deal I guess.
So you misrepresented the block due to ignorance or flat out lied about it.
The rest of the rotating assembly was as you said except for the rings missing to the diamond pistons with cheap hastings in place of them.
But all in all it was still an OK deal I guess.