Which Cold Air Intake Is Best??
Thread Starter
Teching In
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Which Cold Air Intake Is Best?? Gotta '05 GXP... completely stock, just wondering which intake manufacturer is best for the cold air intake. Some say CAI, others say K&N??? How much better do these things make the car in the 1/4 mile?
its not enough of a difference to tell, i have the CAI and i'm happy with that. Some say the CAI box helps keep the heat out. I better intake alone wont change much other then sound.
I use the k&n and saw a huge increase in power, more than any other mod plus the sound is awsome. But acually when i put the airraid throttle body spacer on with the k&n i gained 9 hp on the dyno and 17 lb of torque so i guess the two work real well together.
Airaid 200-586 PowerAid Throttle Body Spacer, that is what i bought, and those gains were after the k&n, but only the tbs, i did a dyno before i put the tbs on and than after i put it on.
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
It says that spacer is for these vehicles. It fits our V8?
BUICK RAINIER 2004-2005 L6 4.2L
CHEVROLET TRAILBLAZER 2002-2007 L6 4.2L
GMC ENVOY 2002-2007 L6 4.2L
ISUZU ASCENDER 2003-2004 L6 4.2L
OLDSMOBILE BRAVADA 2002-2004 L6 4.2L
BUICK RAINIER 2004-2005 L6 4.2L
CHEVROLET TRAILBLAZER 2002-2007 L6 4.2L
GMC ENVOY 2002-2007 L6 4.2L
ISUZU ASCENDER 2003-2004 L6 4.2L
OLDSMOBILE BRAVADA 2002-2004 L6 4.2L
Not calling you a liar, just seems like quite a big increase for just a spacer.
I'm curious because I just picked up an '06 GXP and I'm planning on doing all the mods you have in your sig with the exception of the tune (for now). Illinois uses OBD-II emissions testing and the test station equipment doesn't like aftermarket tunes sometimes.
I'm also planning on doing the Vector IAT relocation kit as well. Just want to get an idea of what my car will put down at the wheel by looking at your dyno numbers.
I was planning on running the cat-less down pipe. I don't have any cats on my girlfriends '02 GT. It failed the emissions test with a Diablosport tune. I put the stock tune back in and made these homemade MIL eliminators for less than $5:
http://paladinmicro.com/MustangMILEliminator.htm
The car passed and hasn't set any codes. I haven't checked into the wiring on the post-cat O2 on my GXP yet, but I'm sure its not a wideband so I don't see why the same mod wouldn't work. Unless the ECM is too "smart" for it.
http://paladinmicro.com/MustangMILEliminator.htm
The car passed and hasn't set any codes. I haven't checked into the wiring on the post-cat O2 on my GXP yet, but I'm sure its not a wideband so I don't see why the same mod wouldn't work. Unless the ECM is too "smart" for it.
I was planning on running the cat-less down pipe. I don't have any cats on my girlfriends '02 GT. It failed the emissions test with a Diablosport tune. I put the stock tune back in and made these homemade MIL eliminators for less than $5:
http://paladinmicro.com/MustangMILEliminator.htm
The car passed and hasn't set any codes. I haven't checked into the wiring on the post-cat O2 on my GXP yet, but I'm sure its not a wideband so I don't see why the same mod wouldn't work. Unless the ECM is too "smart" for it.
http://paladinmicro.com/MustangMILEliminator.htm
The car passed and hasn't set any codes. I haven't checked into the wiring on the post-cat O2 on my GXP yet, but I'm sure its not a wideband so I don't see why the same mod wouldn't work. Unless the ECM is too "smart" for it.
