Just picked up a 08 gxp
2004 Monte Carlo SS, which was Paid off in 2006 was traded in for 16,000
I had another 6,000 in cash to put down along with the 16,000 on the car
Thats 22,000
Then there was another 3,500 in rebates that I recieved
That brings the total to 25,500 on a 26,500 car.
WHERE THE **** DO YOU GET 19,000???
okay, think of it like this:
the total quoted price = 26500
rebates = 3500
therefore, you have to pay 23000 on the car, somehow.
This is the price that you have to pay for the car.
There are many ways you can pay this price. You can get a loan, you can pay cash, whatever.
You chose to pay first by trading in your car. Your car is not just a worthless item that magically subtracts 16000 from the price - the car has a value of 16000 - it is $16,000 in assets to you. By trading it, you are effectively selling the car to the dealer for 16000 and using the cash to put towards the car. By trading in, you are paying (and losing) $16,000 in assets.
Next, you paid $6000 in cash. How you don't see this as a cost to you is beyond me.
Finally, you paid $1000 over time or whatever, it doesn't matter.
That adds up to $23000 that you had to come up with to pay the dealer for your car.
You don't know how the other posters paid for their cars. How do you know that the person who bought theirs for $19500 didn't trade in their old car for $16000 too and put $3500 down?
either way you look at it, you had to come up with $23000 (in assets and cash), while the other person had to pay only $19500 (in assets and/or cash).
By the way, my Impala SS cost me less than $14,000, total price, including taxes. Even though I actually DID pay less, you don't see me running around trying to make sure everybody knows...
Does this really not make sense to you though? Do you really not think that giving away a $16,000 car and paying $6000 out of your pocket is a cost to you and part of what you PAID for the car?
In the end, I still ended up paying only 1k for a brand new 2007 Monte Carlo SS. Doesnt mater how "YOU" want to see it as, but how it really is, is the real way its done.
The car was paid off, there for its mine. If the dealer gives me cash for it, then its coming on the sticker of that car.
How would I be losing assets for something that is mine and paid in full a full year before I brought something else? Thats like paying off your house, putting money into it and then selling it and putting your money together to buy a better house. ITs not going to cost you as much out of pocket as it wouldve it you didnt have it in the first place.
In the end, if I only paid 1K out of my pocket after the deal was done, I would say thats one hell of a loan to get for a new car to pay it off.
Taz, dont worry some of us did get through school and can do math.
In the end, I still ended up paying only 1k for a brand new 2007 Monte Carlo SS. Doesnt mater how "YOU" want to see it as, but how it really is, is the real way its done.
The car was paid off, there for its mine. If the dealer gives me cash for it, then its coming on the sticker of that car.
How would I be losing assets for something that is mine and paid in full a full year before I brought something else? Thats like paying off your house, putting money into it and then selling it and putting your money together to buy a better house. ITs not going to cost you as much out of pocket as it wouldve it you didnt have it in the first place.
In the end, if I only paid 1K out of my pocket after the deal was done, I would say thats one hell of a loan to get for a new car to pay it off.
think of it this way.
what did you have to give up in order to get the car?
you gave up a $16,000 car.
you gave up $6000 in cash.
you gave up $1000 through loans.
therefore, you gave up (paid) $23000
if it only COST you $1000, you would still have that $6000 and another car worth $16000. but you gave that to the dealership instead to pay for your next car.
if you're just talking about getting a loan, that's different. hell, i paid for my car entirely in cash down when i took the car. does that mean that i paid NOTHING on my car, since i didn't have to get a loan? that's the logic you are using.
wow! so, if i use your line of thinking.... the price was $14000, and i put $14000 - that equals 0 - I got my car for free! woohoo!
Last edited by usmabmass; Feb 28, 2008 at 11:28 PM.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Taz, dont worry some of us did get through school and can do math.
by the way, they are not simply "giving him cash for what he owns" - it's not free money. the car is WORTH $16,000. he's not gaining 16000, they are simply changing it effectively from $16000 in car parts to $16000 in paper money, and then taking it to pay for the car. therefore, he loses $16000 worth of goods, he doesn't gain it and then use it to knock the price down.
Last edited by usmabmass; Feb 28, 2008 at 11:31 PM.
by the way, they are not simply "giving him cash for what he owns" - it's not free money. the car is WORTH $16,000. he's not gaining 16000, they are simply changing it effectively from $16000 in car parts to $16000 in paper money, and then taking it to pay for the car. therefore, he loses $16000 worth of goods, he doesn't gain it and then use it to knock the price down.
i'm not sure why this is such a point of contention...
i didn't disagree with anything you said, but i don't see what you're trying to accomplish with it. i said that he used his old car to help pay for his new one - that doesn't mean that the price of his new car was less, it only means that he partly paid the price using his old car. the price was still 23000, whether or not he traded in or not..
does this really not make sense????
i'm seriously baffled that this is so confusing to some people.
do you not understand the concept of trade? the car is worth $16,000 and he came up with $6000 and got a loan for $1000. that comes to $16,000 in car and $7,000 in cash.
The dealer wanted 23000 for the car and didn't care how he paid for it. he paid for it by trading a $16000 car and trading $7000 in cash to get the new car. the price was still the same (23k) even if he paid for it all in cash.
for you to say that the dealer dropped the price on the new car 16000 in return for the used car is like saying that i got a candy bar for free because i put a put a down payment of $1 on it, and so the price was zero.
anyways, this argument is a waste of space. i really hope you're just playing around, and that you actually do understand how... buying things... works. the guy came in wanted to brag about how little he paid for his car, when he really paid thousands more. that's all - your inability to do basic comprehension is an entirely different problem.
Last edited by usmabmass; Feb 29, 2008 at 09:07 AM.
i know that GM was supposed to release an OEM-type plug for ipod, but there are aftermarket systems you can put in. i would just do a google search for ipod adapter impala 06 and see what comes up..

