LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Pulse Width readings for LTx engines w/TTS datamaster

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 01:50 AM
  #1  
Steve40th's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Default Pulse Width readings for LTx engines w/TTS datamaster

Just curious what range you all are seeing in respect to injector pulse widths from idle to WOT with your LTx engines using TTS Datamaster( my old DIACOM read the same).But I have seen up to 20MS for WOT by others in other forums etc.
Mine are 2ms to 10ms with duty cycle 90% atWOT and 12.8to 1AFR with Wideband O2'
Mines 396LT1 w/SVO 30#'s 230/236 Comp Cams etc etc
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 08:35 PM
  #2  
TurboBob's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Detroit MI
Default

post some pulsewidth, dutycycle%, and RPM numbers.

A lot of tools report pulsewidth that is half of actual. I haven't used either diacom or datamaster in quite a while.

At 5000RPM, 24ms is 100%

Bob
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 09:49 PM
  #3  
Steve40th's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TurboBob
post some pulsewidth, dutycycle%, and RPM numbers.

A lot of tools report pulsewidth that is half of actual. I haven't used either diacom or datamaster in quite a while.

At 5000RPM, 24ms is 100%

Bob
idle 2ms, WOT 10-11ms, TTS Datamaster with 90% duty cycle and O2's hovering around 900mv.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 09:32 AM
  #4  
TurboBob's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Detroit MI
Default

sounds like Datamaster is reporting pulsewidth at half of actual.

Bob
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 09:54 AM
  #5  
Steve40th's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TurboBob
sounds like Datamaster is reporting pulsewidth at half of actual.

Bob
Interesting, so my idle is twice from what it shows? Ouch. idles fine though.
Diacom shows the same. I wonder if it is because of batchfire system, as 94 went to sequential?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 10:07 AM
  #6  
TurboBob's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Detroit MI
Default

Originally Posted by Steve40th
Interesting, so my idle is twice from what it shows? Ouch. idles fine though.
Diacom shows the same. I wonder if it is because of batchfire system, as 94 went to sequential?
what year is your car? if its a 93 (batchfire) then what you are seeing is correct.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 05:00 PM
  #7  
Steve40th's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TurboBob
what year is your car? if its a 93 (batchfire) then what you are seeing is correct.
Thanks, just to clarify, my pulses are actually 2 ms at idle and 10 ms at WOT? And not half of what they would be if it were not for the batch fire system?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 06:29 PM
  #8  
TurboBob's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Detroit MI
Default

Originally Posted by Steve40th
Thanks, just to clarify, my pulses are actually 2 ms at idle and 10 ms at WOT? And not half of what they would be if it were not for the batch fire system?
yes, you are correct
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 AM.