How to identify LT4 Intake and Heads
03-18-2009, 07:01 AM
#21
You guys don't seem to see the difference between posting bad info and specifically arguining against and contradicting good info.
Look at my first post, no hostility or anything, just trying to correct info.
The unpleasantness came after I posted the right information with some proof and someone then had to post bad information again.
Like I said, imagine what other common beliefs are so very wrong.
Look at my first post, no hostility or anything, just trying to correct info.
The unpleasantness came after I posted the right information with some proof and someone then had to post bad information again.
Like I said, imagine what other common beliefs are so very wrong.
03-18-2009, 07:05 AM
#22
TECH Veteran
Not everyone has the same way of getting something across, but I would rather have the correct information than wrong information.
IMHO, you should not go back and edit [delete content of] posts. It takes away the continuity of the thread for anyone that reads it in the future.
IMHO, you should not go back and edit [delete content of] posts. It takes away the continuity of the thread for anyone that reads it in the future.
03-18-2009, 09:47 AM
#23
You guys don't seem to see the difference between posting bad info and specifically arguining against and contradicting good info.
Look at my first post, no hostility or anything, just trying to correct info.
The unpleasantness came after I posted the right information with some proof and someone then had to post bad information again.
Like I said, imagine what other common beliefs are so very wrong.
Look at my first post, no hostility or anything, just trying to correct info.
The unpleasantness came after I posted the right information with some proof and someone then had to post bad information again.
Like I said, imagine what other common beliefs are so very wrong.
03-18-2009, 01:23 PM
#26
You guys don't seem to see the difference between posting bad info and specifically arguining against and contradicting good info.
Look at my first post, no hostility or anything, just trying to correct info.
The unpleasantness came after I posted the right information with some proof and someone then had to post bad information again.
Like I said, imagine what other common beliefs are so very wrong.
Look at my first post, no hostility or anything, just trying to correct info.
The unpleasantness came after I posted the right information with some proof and someone then had to post bad information again.
Like I said, imagine what other common beliefs are so very wrong.
I don't think his response was intended to contradict your information. you have to look at the situation as such in relation to world is flat vs round arguement of old. people accepted that the world was flat because that was what they were lead to believe, no reason to crucify those who follow such simply because that is what the majority believes. there are better ways to educate and inform, too easily you fly off the handle and feel the need to belittle others
