Nittos like a really long burn out to really get them to work right |
What are the specs of the cadillac cam? |
Originally Posted by BTC
(Post 11382913)
How much is the Cadillac cam? Does it drive, and sound, like stock?
Originally Posted by ss.slp.ls1
(Post 11382995)
With headers I'd recommend going with a larger cam. and he could yes, but there are plenty of people who run the LPE 211-219 cam and others that are similiar in duration that have full bolt-on's including headers. its all a matter of personal prefference. :chug: |
Originally Posted by slick1851
(Post 11383192)
Nittos like a really long burn out to really get them to work right
Originally Posted by WhitePhoenix99
(Post 11384076)
What are the specs of the cadillac cam? |
I think the MPH is low. There are bolt on cars running that kind of MPH. You might need a tune to help wake it up some. |
Originally Posted by PNYKLR-TA
(Post 11387538)
212-219 with some decent lift .53x's and .54x's and thats with stock rockers so with 1.6's it goes up even more. Damn, if I had known the specs on this cam when I was looking for small cams I possibly would have gotten it instead of my LPE due to the higher lift! Small cams are fun!! :chug: |
with a 3200 stall you should be able to cut much better 60foot's last year with my 3200vig, i hit a few 1.69's and consistant 1.7's with the track nice and prepped. I ran a 13.08 with a 1.8 60ft at 102mph with cat-back, stock manifolds, cold air, no cats, slicks and the 3200vig. Seems like your set-up should have more in it with that MPH and get that 60ft down and i see 12.7's preety easy if not better... |
I trapped 104.5 on a 90* summer day. That was with cai and catback only, on the stock goodyear eagle gsc's. I would say your slightly down on power(could be the converter), but overall not bad at all. 12's is nice congrats! |
Originally Posted by buzz12586
(Post 11387658)
I think the MPH is low. There are bolt on cars running that kind of MPH. You might need a tune to help wake it up some. and like i said if i were at sea level that would have been a 12.66 with a 106 trap speed. for a stalled auto i'd say thats pretty damn good. plus i still have the stock TB.
Originally Posted by krill
(Post 11387810)
Damn, if I had known the specs on this cam when I was looking for small cams I possibly would have gotten it instead of my LPE due to the higher lift! Small cams are fun!! :chug:
Originally Posted by 2XR95Z28
(Post 11387845)
with a 3200 stall you should be able to cut much better 60foot's last year with my 3200vig, i hit a few 1.69's and consistant 1.7's with the track nice and prepped. I ran a 13.08 with a 1.8 60ft at 102mph with cat-back, stock manifolds, cold air, no cats, slicks and the 3200vig. Seems like your set-up should have more in it with that MPH and get that 60ft down and i see 12.7's preety easy if not better...
Originally Posted by kinglt-1
(Post 11388041)
I trapped 104.5 on a 90* summer day. That was with cai and catback only, on the stock goodyear eagle gsc's. I would say your slightly down on power(could be the converter), but overall not bad at all. 12's is nice congrats! and for the record, i trapped 104 with just a cat back and intake as well but that was before the converter. |
The stock TB is not holding you back. It doesn't become a restriction until 400whp if I remember correctly. The DA of 2000 explains why your trap speed was low. |
Dude im not knockin your setup, im just sayin the converter could be eatin a few mph on the big end, notice the congrats at the end of my post!!!!!!! Not sure on Da im in northeast indiana, it was 90 out with 100% humidity. Besides that was 8yrs ago, I was just goin back in my head and tryin to compare. Im sure you can get that 60ft down a bit and it will run mid 12's. |
Originally Posted by buzz12586
(Post 11388326)
The stock TB is not holding you back. It doesn't become a restriction until 400whp if I remember correctly. The DA of 2000 explains why your trap speed was low.
Originally Posted by kinglt-1
(Post 11388329)
Dude im not knockin your setup, im just sayin the converter could be eatin a few mph on the big end, notice the congrats at the end of my post!!!!!!! Not sure on Da im in northeast indiana, it was 90 out with 100% humidity. Besides that was 8yrs ago, I was just goin back in my head and tryin to compare. Im sure you can get that 60ft down a bit and it will run mid 12's. and if i could get potentially a 1.7 60' that'd be .4 off my 1/4 mile time using the rule of thumb that every tenth in your 60' dropped is 2 tenths total 1/4 mile time dropped. thanks for reading everyone and after this coming weekend and some practicing launching i hope to be coming back with a better time for you guys! :chug::chug::chug: |
Its hard to tell what your car would run in better DA. Those calculators aren't always the greatest. Just work on getting the 60ft down and you'll be happy. |
Originally Posted by buzz12586
(Post 11388424)
Its hard to tell what your car would run in better DA. Those calculators aren't always the greatest. Just work on getting the 60ft down and you'll be happy. but i would be alot happier with a mid 12 true true :ripped: haha! ill be working my launch out this coming weekend and hope to come back with at least a 12.7. and yea i know those calculators arent the best, but hey its an estimate. i guess ill just have to travel to one of these tracks that have some negative DA's or near zero :D |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands