LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Lets build a 427 Dart block LT1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2009, 12:29 AM
  #21  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
Bersaglieri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wild West
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Corey @ Clayton Racing
I

spin the tires, put on stickys. - Hoosiers
break the rear, fix the rear - 9" Spooled
break the clutch fix the clutch - Clutch Packs
break the axle, fix the axle - Moser axles
break the driveshaft, fix the driveshaft - 1350 jointed aftermarket
break the trans, fix the trans - 4L80 + Vigilante

There is a lot of stuff that needs to be thought of.....
Price me a block

-Dustin-
Old 05-31-2009, 07:41 AM
  #22  
FormerVendor
 
Corey @ Clayton Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bartlett
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

send me a pm with your info, as soon as we have the finalized pricing I'll be letting everyone know. Right now we have a first come first serve list going and I'll get the info out as soon as I get it.
Old 05-31-2009, 03:33 PM
  #23  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Armyman2445's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

CANT WAIT TILL NEXT TAX SEASON!!!!!!!!!!!!

Im thinking 427ci, AFR 227 heads, with a docile cam (24X/25X .6XX/.6XX 108lsa) 6 speed, S60 w, 4.56's. Vic Jr intake, elbow 90mm tb, And have kooks make up a stepped header (1 7/8-2). That would be a great DD, with some power to defend off mustangs. All while having AC!!! .

Got a nice Washington DC mission coming up in a few months. Was going to build an LS camaro, but this will get me back to my roots. The LT roots that is. I mean what else am I going to spend $3000 a month on. I know A 427CI LT1 thats what!!!
Old 05-31-2009, 06:16 PM
  #24  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
mdacton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Goochland, Va.
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Armyman2445
CANT WAIT TILL NEXT TAX SEASON!!!!!!!!!!!!

Im thinking 427ci, AFR 227 heads, with a docile cam (24X/25X .6XX/.6XX 108lsa) 6 speed, S60 w, 4.56's. Vic Jr intake, elbow 90mm tb, And have kooks make up a stepped header (1 7/8-2).
why so small on the camshaft? I have 270@ .050 on a 106 and its pretty smooth in a 383. I wouldn't drive a mechanical roller on the street tho, its going to eat up alot of parts.

I would just convert a set of race flow development heads 18* if I was going to do all this....

But then again I would just get a littleM block and go to a sbc..... I don't see any benifit at all having a LTx at this point in my program...... You could do so much more in a build for this kind of money.

I'm not sure how many of you have driven around 500+ h.p. cars on the street...but things can take a turn for the worst real fast
Old 05-31-2009, 07:55 PM
  #25  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Armyman2445's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mdacton
why so small on the camshaft? I have 270@ .050 on a 106 and its pretty smooth in a 383. I wouldn't drive a mechanical roller on the street tho, its going to eat up alot of parts.
Pure street car. Hydraulic roller cam. Just a pure street car. Might see the track 1 or 2 times in its life. Something I can drive coast to coast in if I choose.
Old 05-31-2009, 07:59 PM
  #26  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
mdacton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Goochland, Va.
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Armyman2445
Pure street car. Hydraulic roller cam. Just a pure street car. Might see the track 1 or 2 times in its life. Something I can drive coast to coast in if I choose.
then whats the point? I just don't see any advantage of spending all that money on something your not even going to USE the extra that you spent the money for to begin with.

Thats just me though......
Old 05-31-2009, 09:28 PM
  #27  
10 Second Club
 
joelster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,630
Received 26 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mdacton
then whats the point? I just don't see any advantage of spending all that money on something your not even going to USE the extra that you spent the money for to begin with.

Thats just me though......
BS...44 more cubes is 44 more cubes. There's no replacement for displacement. A nice torquey 383 will get you 425ft/lbs. A nice torquey 427 "could" get you 475 ft/lbs. That's enough power to feel, easy. People need to realize that building a 383 involves about $1000-$1500 in block-prep and machining. This Dart block only requires minimal work, maybe $200-$300. No word on pricing but I bet it will be around $1700-$1800 or so. So figure $2000 total for an assembly-ready Dart block. I'd pay an extra $500 for 44 more cubes and 50 more ft/lbs of torque.

How many guys build 396 big-blocks nowadays? 427's? 454's?

None.

They all go bigger whenever they can.
Old 05-31-2009, 09:35 PM
  #28  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Puck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by joelster
BS...44 more cubes is 44 more cubes. There's no replacement for displacement. A nice torquey 383 will get you 425ft/lbs. A nice torquey 427 "could" get you 475 ft/lbs. That's enough power to feel, easy. People need to realize that building a 383 involves about $1000-$1500 in block-prep and machining. This Dart block only requires minimal work, maybe $200-$300. No word on pricing but I bet it will be around $1700-$1800 or so. So figure $2000 total for an assembly-ready Dart block. I'd pay an extra $500 for 44 more cubes and 50 more ft/lbs of torque.

How many guys build 396 big-blocks nowadays? 427's? 454's?

None.

They all go bigger whenever they can.
I agree the extra cubes are awesome, but I think your pricing is optimistic. I would guess around 2 grand even for the block, then the extra 300 or so for machine work.

Still not bad considering the price of getting a used ltx block prepped and ready for a 396...then you get all the extra displacement for not much more cash.
Old 05-31-2009, 09:38 PM
  #29  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
Ponch95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by joelster

None.

They all go bigger whenever they can.
Wooohooo sounding like a bunch of women
Old 05-31-2009, 11:46 PM
  #30  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Armyman2445's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Why did GM make the LS7 a 427??? B/C they can. Why do ricers put on a 88mm turbo on a 4 banger??? B/C they can. Why do women get boob jobs??? B/C they can. Why do I masterbate??? B/C I can.

Things in this world are not done for a purpose. They are done because they can be. That's what makes up unique and special (some more than others).
Old 06-01-2009, 07:29 AM
  #31  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (23)
 
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mobile Ala
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I drive my mechanical roller all over the place. It is "medium" sized for a 383, 254@050 on a 108. Drives great. MD's 270@050 would drive great in a 427.

I tell ya what, I could build another 75 rwhp with that 427 vs my 383 with my top end on it, it would need a little more headwork and the intake worked over and more cam.....but I see it not to hard to do.
Old 06-01-2009, 08:35 AM
  #32  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
tomsws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: dover delaware
Posts: 278
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

id like to see what they could come up with in a turnkey package...
Old 06-01-2009, 12:42 PM
  #33  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
mdacton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Goochland, Va.
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
I drive my mechanical roller all over the place. It is "medium" sized for a 383, 254@050 on a 108. Drives great. MD's 270@050 would drive great in a 427.

I tell ya what, I could build another 75 rwhp with that 427 vs my 383 with my top end on it, it would need a little more headwork and the intake worked over and more cam.....but I see it not to hard to do.
How many people have what you already have though? Don't forget alot of these guys have to start from scratch..... If I had to start from the beggining then I know I could make more power for the same price with a different platform..... maybe a cleveland
Old 07-03-2009, 06:51 PM
  #34  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ElkySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

well i did some playing around with comp cams cam selection program (alot like desktop dyno but you can only use their cams) and built a 427 lt1 w/ afr 227, ported stock intake with a monoblade, 12.5 compression on gas with the biggest cam they had (292 XFI) and it came out to 630.4 hp 592.6 ft/lbs.

this program seems to be pretty accurate because i also built a stock motor with a cc503 and it cam out to 349 hp
Old 07-03-2009, 06:52 PM
  #35  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ElkySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

switch to a single plane and it jumps to 728.3 hp and 638.9 ft/lbs
Old 07-03-2009, 07:18 PM
  #36  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
97Z28SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,290
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I would get some SB2.2's or some 18* heads and matching singe plane intake and have them converted for LT1 usage and make 800hp.
Old 07-03-2009, 07:18 PM
  #37  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Puck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ElkySS
switch to a single plane and it jumps to 728.3 hp and 638.9 ft/lbs
Check the math on that one...single plane wont get you 100hp in a million years. What cfm did you put for the single plane and the heads? What rpm did it say it will peak at?

The numbers seem highly optimistic. I could see between 575 and 600 hp with out of the box 227s and a xfi292 with the single plane and ALL supporting mods, but not any more then that. Certainly nowhere near 700, let alone 728.

The 292 is a horrible NA cam anyway IMO. The 113 LSA and big exhaust duration split makes it look like a nitrous grind. I wouldn't run that cam all motor but 427ci + xfi292 + ported AFRs and a 300 shot would be a nasty combination.

The calculators are fun to play with but the numbers are not really worth anything in the real world.
Old 07-03-2009, 07:56 PM
  #38  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ElkySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

well i know that but i thought it was kinda interesting. if i wer to build a motor like this, the afrs would be ported as far as they would go with a custom grind cam.

i just put in the flow numbers on afrs website. i didnt know what cfm a single plane flows so i just put in the cfm from the monoblade someone on this site told me, which was 1500 cfm. that did seem a little high to me tho
Old 07-03-2009, 08:08 PM
  #39  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Puck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ElkySS
well i know that but i thought it was kinda interesting. if i wer to build a morot like this, the afrs would be ported as far as they would go with a custom grind cam.

i just put in the flow numbers on afrs website. i didnt know what cfm a single plane flows so i just put in the cfm from the monoblade someone on this site told me, which was 1500 cfm. that did seem a little high to me tho
That is the problem, it won't flow anywhere near that IIIRC a max ported supervic flows in the 330cfm range, but it is a PITA to find flow numbers for intakes, and it has been ages since I checked so that might be wrong...Don't forget that porting an intake that much will hurt air velocity, just like in a set of heads, and may sacrifice low to mid range power numbers.

Intakes are flow rated by each runner, just like heads, not the total flow. Ideally you want each intake runner to flow the same or more then the intake port on the head to keep the intake from being a bottleneck.
Old 07-03-2009, 08:22 PM
  #40  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ElkySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

it doesnt have a spot for intake cfm. just total cfm and i wasnt sure which part would get me the closest so i chose the tb



Quick Reply: Lets build a 427 Dart block LT1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 AM.