LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Convertor or Headers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 09:35 AM
  #1  
toyotajeep's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default Convertor or Headers?

Hello,

I am most likely keeping my car for awhile. It is a stock 95 LT1 with an A4 and 135K on it. I drive it no less than 40 miles everytime I start it, so gas mileage is important.

I'd like to start drag racing next summer, and perhaps some AutoX. Week end warrior a few times with a definate interest in the drags. I will likely do SFC's, and LCA's as well as other simple things to keep the car straight and so forth.

As far as performance goes, which will net me a bigger return in performance, the headers like pacesetters with no cats, or a good 3000-3600 stall?

The car is pretty tight and pretty clean. I want to drive it most every day and lay down a reasonable number at the track.

BTW- Just for fun, what should a stock 3.23 geared LT1 run with a convertor alone? What should it do with both convertor and headers?

I am looking for the most bang for the buck, while still accepting the fact that it is a DD and I do take trips in it.

Thank you for your help.

ROB
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 09:57 AM
  #2  
bowtienut's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 5
From: Bright, IN
Default

The TC will get you far more bang for the buck in ET at the strip.
Go with a Yank SS3600 for a stock engine. Good for .5 to .6 sec. assuming you'll have DR's or slicks.
Headers and exhaust would get you about .2 sec with a stock engine.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 10:02 AM
  #3  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 8
From: South Jersey
Default

AutoX with a big converter = womp womp.

Both setups require completely different suspension approaches.

However for the drags the converter will provide far more than the headers alone.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 04:06 PM
  #4  
chevy94c's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 627
Likes: 3
From: Mass
Default

Converter is the best choice
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 04:31 PM
  #5  
nomoneyz's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 1
From: Apple Valley - So Cal
Default

Since your worried about mileage. NONE. Just suck it up and get the converter and a big trans cooler.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 05:11 PM
  #6  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 15
Default

converter isn't bad for mileage provided you have the gears to keep it locked up at your normal cruise speed.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 06:06 PM
  #7  
lt4388stroker's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Eden, NC
Default

neither get a 4 cylinder lol
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 06:14 PM
  #8  
nomoneyz's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 1
From: Apple Valley - So Cal
Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
converter isn't bad for mileage provided you have the gears to keep it locked up at your normal cruise speed.
That is a good point. If i'd of had gears first then got my converter it probably wouldn't have been bad. I put a 3200 in with a 2.73 gear. I was a nooooooob.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 06:51 PM
  #9  
93 LT1 Vette's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Deep in the heart of Texas
Default

Put a 100 shot on it with a mailorder tune and run it.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 07:50 AM
  #10  
toyotajeep's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

I have 3.23's and I am looking for a compromise car. I am willing to accept the compromises in performance.

I am sure that a set of 3.73's, headers and a convertor would get me a pretty good wow! factor.

Unfortunately, I need to drive 40 miles at hwy speeds everytime I drive it MPG does matter.

In your opinion, what is the maximum stall you can run with 3.23's and keep reasonable driving performance and efficiency? I don't mind installing a cooler.

Thank you, ROB
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 08:32 AM
  #11  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 8
From: South Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by toyotajeep
I have 3.23's and I am looking for a compromise car. I am willing to accept the compromises in performance.

I am sure that a set of 3.73's, headers and a convertor would get me a pretty good wow! factor.

Unfortunately, I need to drive 40 miles at hwy speeds everytime I drive it MPG does matter.

In your opinion, what is the maximum stall you can run with 3.23's and keep reasonable driving performance and efficiency? I don't mind installing a cooler.

Thank you, ROB
A good converter and 3.73s won't sacrifice much MPG whatsoever as long as you retain the lockup feature at cruise.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 01:26 PM
  #12  
pillarpod's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 1
From: South Dakota
Default

yank that bitch
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 02:20 PM
  #13  
Pat Burton's Avatar
9 Second Club
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

A converter will help a ton on the street and strip. Depending on the stall it wont effect your MPG very much either (if you can keep your foot out of it). I use EDGE racing converters. They are really well built and very tight converters after it reaches its stall speed.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 08:04 AM
  #14  
1961ba427's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 1
From: Milledgeville, GA
Default

Since you're concerned about mpg's......don't spend money on a 3.73 gear swap when you can buy a whole 3.42 rearend for CHEAP from an M6 that will probably be quieter than the average new gear install anyway. That way you'll get about half the gain of 3.23 to 3.73, your mpg change would be barely noticeable, and you'll save some money while having your original rear for a spare. (Which you'll end up needing I bet.)

As far as the headers vs. stall....everyone's already said it: Stall will yield the most. Don't skimp though. I'd rather you put headers in than an uneffecient convertor that might stall high, but eats HP and your fuel ecomomy.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 08:19 AM
  #15  
toyotajeep's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

Thank you for the input. I will see what this winter brings. From playing with other cars over the years the same message always comes through; you really get what you pay for with convertors. I have seen them under $200 for a convertor. It looks like a good one will run me about $500.

3k or 3600 convertor? My gut says 3k.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 08:33 AM
  #16  
Birdracing's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Canada NL
Default

Hey i just bought a 94 Z28, myself the car is stock besides a cold airintake and a shiftkit in the tranny and the car has 323's, i decided to go with a converter first myself.. You will defintaly get more from a TC than headers by the way i went with a FTI 3200 lock-up..
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 09:04 AM
  #17  
1961ba427's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 1
From: Milledgeville, GA
Default

As long as you are going with a quality convertor I'd go a little bigger than 3k. That 3200 or 3600 sounds good. I'm about to be in the market for one too. Picked up an A4 Trans am. My other LT1 cars are all T56.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 11:42 AM
  #18  
1slow94z28's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: new york
Default

why not do converter and long tubes? theres a ton of good used headers on the forums classifieds.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 AM.