LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

First time to the track... disappointed.

Old May 5, 2014 | 01:58 PM
  #41  
HellTeeOne's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 3
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Originally Posted by BSmiff
Keep doing what youre doing and work on finding the best launch technique. Your 60 is about 2 tenths too slow if that helps. Dont change anything on the setup except your tire pressure down to 20.
Bingo. It's not exactly easy to get a 3.42-geared M6 car to 2.0x short times on street tires. I raced mine for a couple years in stock or bolt-on form and while I was able to eventually cut consistent 2.1s, I only cut a handful of 2.0s.
Reply
Old May 5, 2014 | 02:24 PM
  #42  
MTN_Z's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 389
Likes: 1
From: Melissa, TX
Default

To be honest, 98mph even sounds slow to me. My LS1 M6 dynoed 306 SAE bone stock on a Dynojet and it went 13.2 at 108. My SS put down 272 bone stock. While I haven't had it on the track yet, I highly doubt it would trap under 100, and it isn't any faster than any other M6 LT1. It might just be short shifting like was mentioned. When my SS was on the dyno, the tach read 300 rpm higher than actual, so that could definitely throw things off by causing short-shifting.
Reply
Old May 5, 2014 | 02:46 PM
  #43  
guppymech's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 3
From: Chicagoland
Default

I've got a compilation book of Motor Trend 4th gen articles and all the LT1 cars ran similar times to the OP, mid 14s at 95 to 98 mph. It's funny how all these 'stock' cars get faster as the years go by.
Reply
Old May 5, 2014 | 03:10 PM
  #44  
Dave M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by HellTeeOne
Back when my car had very similar mods to the OP's I was usually shifting to 4th about 100 feet before the traps. I was trapping 101-104 mph depending on track conditions. I was on stock 16 inch wheels with 245 section tires though. When I later went to 17s my traps dropped by about 2mph on average until I did more mods.

If you're wanting to get the most out of a stock or bolt on car then ditch the 17s for track duty. Get a good shifter so you can shift more quickly. Next mods should be good headers and exhaust, 1.6 rockers and springs to enable you to rev it to 6100rpm, and a tune. A M6 bolt on car set up like this will usually run low 13s or very high 12s at around 105-107mph on street tires in good weather.
I'd be very happy with low 13's out of a bolt-on car. A lot of people have been pointing out the shorty headers being a problem, but is that really my sticking point right now? They must flow better than stock manifolds, and I still have the stock y-pipe. I feel like the y-pipe would be the choke point and the headers should be able to handle more power than I'm currently putting out, but you guys would know better than me. The problem is finding a y-pipe that fits up to my mish-mash of an exhaust system... I might be forced to go with an all new exhaust. Which wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. :-) The only problem is finding the budget. 1.6 rockers and a tune are definitely doable.
Reply
Old May 5, 2014 | 03:11 PM
  #45  
Dave M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Oh, and I'd love to go to stock WS6 wheels, in polished aluminum. I've always liked them. That's what used to be on my previous car.
Reply
Old May 5, 2014 | 05:54 PM
  #46  
hrcslam's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 4
From: Maricopa, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by MTN_Z
To be honest, 98mph even sounds slow to me. My LS1 M6 dynoed 306 SAE bone stock on a Dynojet and it went 13.2 at 108. My SS put down 272 bone stock. While I haven't had it on the track yet, I highly doubt it would trap under 100, and it isn't any faster than any other M6 LT1. It might just be short shifting like was mentioned. When my SS was on the dyno, the tach read 300 rpm higher than actual, so that could definitely throw things off by causing short-shifting.
The LS1 is a sizable step up from the potent LT1. Mod for Mod a 5.7L Gen3 will eat up a 5.7L Gen2 SBC. The LM7 5.3L stock from 2001 pushed more power than a LT1 from 1995. Smaller displacement, lower rpm, smaller cam, more power. The Gen3 Motor really is that good. That's not saying an LT1 is horrible, they aren't. I eat up many others with my 19 year old Camaro. But an equally modded LS1 would beat me every time.

More perspective, I could get more power out of my Suburbans 5.3L for less money than my LT1 Camaro every day of the week. And it would last longer.

Originally Posted by Dave M
I'd be very happy with low 13's out of a bolt-on car. A lot of people have been pointing out the shorty headers being a problem, but is that really my sticking point right now? They must flow better than stock manifolds, and I still have the stock y-pipe. I feel like the y-pipe would be the choke point and the headers should be able to handle more power than I'm currently putting out, but you guys would know better than me. The problem is finding a y-pipe that fits up to my mish-mash of an exhaust system... I might be forced to go with an all new exhaust. Which wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. :-) The only problem is finding the budget. 1.6 rockers and a tune are definitely doable.
Your headers are of no consequence. Don't even worry about them at this point. Stock manifold cars run faster than you did at your density altitude.

Just keep practicing on your launch.

If you plan on lowering your car those shorty's might be helpful for ground clearance. Here's my LT's on a 1.25" drop ground clearance. It looks bigger than it really is.



Will long tube headers help? That's debatable. It really depends on many other factors (cam, heads, collector size, collector length, primary shape and size, merge points, scavenging timing, etc.). Some report gains below peak tq (which could hurt launch) with LTs over shorties and roughly the same power above peak tq. Others show big gains up top with drops down low using LT's over shorties. It all depends on your particular set up.
Reply
Old May 5, 2014 | 07:44 PM
  #47  
BSmiff's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
From: In the moment...
Default

My tired old LT1 bone *** stock with an auto went 14.0@97 but I was at sea level. Altitude makes a huge difference in cars in any form; even moreso on bone stock cars running 14s.
Reply
Old May 5, 2014 | 11:18 PM
  #48  
MTN_Z's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 389
Likes: 1
From: Melissa, TX
Default

Originally Posted by hrcslam
The LS1 is a sizable step up from the potent LT1. Mod for Mod a 5.7L Gen3 will eat up a 5.7L Gen2 SBC. The LM7 5.3L stock from 2001 pushed more power than a LT1 from 1995. Smaller displacement, lower rpm, smaller cam, more power. The Gen3 Motor really is that good. That's not saying an LT1 is horrible, they aren't. I eat up many others with my 19 year old Camaro. But an equally modded LS1 would beat me every time.
I definitely agree. My LS1 Camaro will handle my SS fairly easily and it has been bulletproof for the 15 years I've owned it. Gen 3 is a different level. My point was more along the lines of the 34 rwhp difference in stock power not making an 8+ mph trap speed difference. I think it would go high 13s at 101-102 at the same track my LS1 ran 108. I've seen plenty of stock M6 LT1s, friends included, run that. There should be a little bit left in his time. Hopefully I will get a chance to prove my theory right at the track soon.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-3

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-7

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

 Brett Foote
story-9

10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever

 Verdad Gallardo
Old May 6, 2014 | 11:05 AM
  #49  
HellTeeOne's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 3
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Dave M
I'd be very happy with low 13's out of a bolt-on car. A lot of people have been pointing out the shorty headers being a problem, but is that really my sticking point right now? They must flow better than stock manifolds, and I still have the stock y-pipe. I feel like the y-pipe would be the choke point and the headers should be able to handle more power than I'm currently putting out, but you guys would know better than me. The problem is finding a y-pipe that fits up to my mish-mash of an exhaust system... I might be forced to go with an all new exhaust. Which wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. :-) The only problem is finding the budget. 1.6 rockers and a tune are definitely doable.
Any headers that are designed to bolt directly to the stock Y-pipe are not going to be much better than the manifolds in terms of flow. The JBAs from 15 years ago were like that, and sucked.

Get some mids or longtubes and a bigger, catless y-pipe. Bolt a good flowing catback or cutout behind all that and you're good to go. You can likely find all of those parts in the classifieds here gently used for much less than new parts. Don't forget a tune.
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 AM.

story-0
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-3
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-4
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-5
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE
story-8
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

The world was a better place when it was still around.

By Brett Foote | 2026-01-23 09:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever

Slideshow: The 7.0-liter LS7 was designed for absolute cutting-edge performance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-07 18:36:00


VIEW MORE