power loss
Again, a wideband is better and faster at tuning. But just like a compass vs GPS you can still get to your destination, if you know what you're doing. It just takes longer.
You can say what you want about theory of operation. I understand all that. Difference is that I've actually tuned my car with narrow band o2s. Because I understand theory of operation, I also know that is 100% possible to tune using narrow band o2s on cammed up engines with headers.
Apparently scavenging and reverb makes narrow band o2s useless.....
Last edited by hrcslam; Feb 25, 2017 at 05:48 PM.
When tuning with narrow bands you have to let the BLM's settle and make adjustment based off of those in the datalog, but you can only walk it in slowly (you'd want to use the most recent data on the BLM's for adjusting the tune. for example if cell 10 says 128 at the beginning of a data log, but at the end of the log it shows 135 you'd want to adjust that BLM cell 105% in the tune. In reality you'd probably only do 102.5% and log again). You can't see a narrow band showing 108 BLM and assume you can remove 15% of your fueling, because at that mV the narrow band is very inaccurate. You'd want to instead take out half of that and data log again. Rinse and repeat.
If using a wide band you can see AFR at 1.15 Lambda (BLM's would read 108 here) and know you can pull 15% fueling safely, although you'd still not want to pull all of it. Also with a wide band, you'll see the AFR instantly. You don't have to wait for the BLMs to adjust and settle in the data log. This is especially helpful on a dyno, or on a datalogger with the wide bands wired directly to it.
When is comes to headers, you'd want to adjust the voltage delay (this tells the computer that the O2 sensor is further from the heads than stock), so the ECM can more accurately adjust BLM's to the correct BLM Cell.
With bigger cams, you'd want to adjust the O2 mV target at lower RPM's to account for the overlap and reverb.
Last edited by hrcslam; Mar 1, 2017 at 11:58 PM.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
When tuning with narrow bands you have to let the BLM's settle and make adjustment based off of those in the datalog, but you can only walk it in slowly (you'd want to use the most recent data on the BLM's for adjusting the tune. for example if cell 10 says 128 at the beging of a data log, but at the end of the log it shows 135 you'd want to adjust that BLM cell 1.05% in the tune. In reality you'd probably only do 1.025% and log again). You can't see a narrow band showing 108 BLM and assume you can remove 15% of your fueling, because at that mV the narrow band is very inaccurate. You'd want to instead take out half of that and data log again. Rinse and repeat.
If using a wide band you can see AFR at 1.15 Lambda (BLM's would read 108 here) and know you can pull 15% fueling safely, although you'd still not want to pull all of it. Also with a wide band, you'll see the AFR instantly. You don't have to wait for the BLMs to adjust and settle in the data log. This is especially helpful on a dyno, or on a datalogger with the wide bands wired directly to it.
When is comes to headers, you'd want to adjust the voltage delay (this tells the computer that the O2 sensor is further from the heads than stock), so the ECM can more accurately adjust BLM's to the correct BLM Cell.
With bigger cams, you'd want to adjust the O2 mV target at lower RPM's to account for the overlap and reverb.
I never said the wide band was worse, in any way. But if you think it's impossible to do it with narrow bands, your skills are lacking. Because I have. My build (see sig) can grab 45mph in ANY gear (all 6) with 3.42s smoothly. You can't say it's not possible when it has actually happened.
It's truly sad you coming in here thinking you're better than everyone else only to learn your skills aren't very impressive at all. You have not provided any helpful posts at all. All of your comments are about how someone is doing something wrong. Yet the issue was found and with out your precious wide band to boot.....
I never said the wide band was worse, in any way. But if you think it's impossible to do it with narrow bands, your skills are lacking. Because I have. My build (see sig) can grab 45mph in ANY gear (all 6) with 3.42s smoothly. You can't say it's not possible when it has actually happened.
It's truly sad you coming in here thinking you're better than everyone else only to learn your skills aren't very impressive at all. You have not provided any helpful posts at all. All of your comments are about how someone is doing something wrong. Yet the issue was found and with out your precious wide band to boot.....
Saying it's possible and saying they are equal are two completely different things. Just because you lack the skill to fine tune the ECM with narrowbands doesn't make it impossible.
BTW, having a wideband for this issue would help absolutely nothing for troubleshooting over a narrowband. Genius.
There's nothing misleading about what I said. I was pretty clear the wide band is a very good tool (better than a narrow band) for tuning. I was also clear that you can use the narrow band if you actually know what you're doing, and it can be very effective, but takes a lot longer.
For his purpose of troubleshooting, a wide band is not necessary at all. Maybe you should stick to the LS.....
To the side topic you guys have rambled on, you CAN tune with narrow bands, I did with megasquirt 1 on my 3.4L, but the widebands turned 2 weeks work into 2 hours. I am no stranger to engine dynamics and theory.
Due to being unfamiliar with the engine and diagnostic program I could not see the burning tree in the forest fire. Thank you both for your input and help and rest assure when I want more power than I have I will get a WB and a dyno tune
Where is the emoticon for runaway thread?
Last edited by space387; Feb 25, 2017 at 09:38 PM.
The first agreement IS fuel delivery.
MY test is to FILL a Gallon bottle, check for air/delivery volume.
The method is to safely disconnect the fuel rail feed line then fill the container.
The second agreement is UEGO/EGO sensor requirement.
My experience is DIRECT NTK interface starting in 1984.
MY work was to create the FIRST four EGO for NTK
MY method was the measure with the NTK UEGO/three wire EGO, same pipe, same time, bench dyno test.
WHAT WAS FOUND :
BOTH sensors read accurately when in the intended AFR/Operating Range.
The tested three wire EGO was UPGRADED by fitment of a Signal Ground Wire on the body of the sensor base with a hose clamp.
THUS the "birth" of the NOW COMMON four wire "hot start" NTK sensor.
UNDERSTAND that the EGO works (requires) best when the exhaust gas temperature is between 800-1400 F.
The UEGO work (reads) fine over a much greater EGT range.
NOW the MAIN CONCERN is many "Wide Bands" read different in the same pipe, in the same time test.
WORST CASE is the Innovate/NTK test data.
The NTK (most ALL others) will read 13:1 compared to the Innovate read of 12:1.
The "so called" Wide Band UEGO Bible tool is commonly found to be untrue.
Again by bet is on "HRC" as a better tuner.
Lance







