383 Stroker vs LS swap
I'm in the pre-planning phase of trying to build the engine of my 96 Impala SS. I've begun pricing everything out to compare LS and LT cost wise but I would like to see what the general consensus is here in terms of fun and worth of the two.
LS swap would be buying a block and building it over the course of a year or two. Stroker would be buying all the parts, pulling the engine, building it and putting it back in. My knowledge on LS is far greater than LT so it would take more research to figure out a nice combo that I would like. How does everyone like Dynaspark over Optifart?
This will be a street only car. No track time basically ever. I may take it once but that is it.
I'm thinking of selling the engine, trans, turbo kit, and everything so I can swap in an LS and turbo that. I HATE the opti, and the plug wires. The 24x systems are expensive, the transmission and clutchs are less plentiful and more expensive, I have popped a headgasket a couple times. I'm just kind of tired of dealing with it and the inability to get it tuned. There is just so much more out there for the LS and I'm ready to jump on the easy train.
My case is probably different than a whole lot of others, but mine has been unreliable for any long period of time and its mostly due to tuning.
I do however love the sound of the LT1 over the LS.
@Max78 Basically all the things you listed are things I had thought of. Your combination and goals are a bit different than mine seeing as I want to stay N/A, not going to OBD1 but I understand your frustrations.
I am thinking an LS swap would be putting myself on the easy train and all around a better experience. My LT1 has 136k miles on it so I'm just breaking it in

Only maintenance I have done recently is new belt and tensioner. Need to do exhaust manifold gaskets because I have a bad exhaust leak but I was just wondering what the thoughts were. I think I have enough knowledge now to where I could swap it over the course of a weekend or two and some after work wrenching.
383 is about as big as I can go on the LT1. I have seen 393(6?) but that was just something I saw online no real world examples.
Your car is a 96, is it not already obd1?
My car was converted to OBD1 for the better tuning options. The OBD2 lt1 have almost zero tuning options from what I remember. Maybe thats changed?
Trending Topics
11:25 in this video should tell you what you need to know.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Going the 24x route with the 411 pcm would be the best way for sure. I currently have a 411 PCM with the votrech OS, only goes to 2 bar though. havent had the time to try it yet.
Going the 24x route with the 411 pcm would be the best way for sure. I currently have a 411 PCM with the votrech OS, only goes to 2 bar though. havent had the time to try it yet.
My 416 makes 400 wtq at ~2,900 rpm and isn't cam'd for torque. It makes an excellent Impala SS torque curve.
If you can get a 4.125 bore block like an LS7 or sleeved 5.3/LS2/LS3 build a 440 etc
The old 350 with 906 Vortecs and the GM SPO 357 cam made 340 TQ @ 3,400 and 308 HP @ 5,500 through a 4L85E and 9.5" 14-bolt with a clutch fan in place.
Last edited by Fast355; May 1, 2022 at 08:22 PM.
I would want to be able to drive cross country no problem with this thing. It splits daily duties with my truck.
Don't let the opti fear ruin your day. They're not nearly the problem the internet makes them out to be. I've had 3 LT1 wagons and one opti failure in close to a decade. As much as I'd love to go T-x or Torqhead, the ROI isn't there for me - and I'm not exactly shy about pissing money away on superfluous stuff for this car. I put some dielectric grease on the opti o-ring and loctite-d the screws and that's really all it takes. It's been driven in frog-choking rain and snow without a problem. Now whenever I drive in the rain, it's the Suncoast hood sucking in water that gives me pause. Not the opti.
Last edited by atlantadan; Jun 8, 2022 at 05:30 AM.











