LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

LT5?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2005, 03:55 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Murc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LT5?

I wanted to know how much weight the LT1 gained when it became an LT5 on the ZR-1 with DOHC and added chains, valves, springs and larger heads. (correct me if I named the engines wrong)
Old 03-29-2005, 04:07 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
 
AAron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Monroe, SD
Posts: 2,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

they arent at all the same. the LT5 was designed by a marine engine company, i forget who off the top of my head. they had no major interchangeable parts.

but it was aluminum and did gain that much weight. from what i remeber. dont have all my books here that listed the specs.

Last edited by AAron; 03-29-2005 at 04:14 PM.
Old 03-29-2005, 07:17 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Murc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, what I was wondering was the engine in the ZR-1 a) based of the stock corvette engine b) if it was, what all was added and was it any more than the part in the valvetrain, and how much weight it added. A friend of mine is trying to say it added around 100 pounds, and I don't think that sounds right.
Old 03-29-2005, 07:42 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
 
AAron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Monroe, SD
Posts: 2,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yeah like i said it was a totally different engine, not based on the LT1/4. as too the weight 100 lb. isnt too far off.
Old 03-29-2005, 08:27 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
z28boysteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

that motor was a partnership between mercury marine and some other people, doesnt even resemble a small block chevy
Old 03-29-2005, 08:28 PM
  #6  
Teching In
 
Camaro97USAF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wasn't it mercury marine that did that? I think it was them with help from Lotus or something like that. I'm not really sure off the top of my head. Bad *** motors though. Not anywhere near the same as an LT1 though. It'd be nice if parts interchanged though...


Damn he beat me to it...
Old 03-30-2005, 06:03 AM
  #7  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
OutlawZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah the LT5 was an engine designed by Lotus.... No interchangeable parts with an LT1 or LT4 family of engines.... Basically a dual overhead cam smallblock chevy that made somewhere in the area of 405hp...... I'd like to ask all the people that still own ZR1's how expensive it must be to find parts for that thing nowadays......
Old 03-30-2005, 09:52 AM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
 
tooquick2beslo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Newport News, Va
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yea, It was made by Lotus and the company almost went bankrupt making that engine.
Old 03-30-2005, 10:16 PM
  #9  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
transamman400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Devils Lake, ND
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

LT5 summed up...

1985, GM asks Lotus to make a DOHC version of SBC. Lotus says the motor isn't compatible, inadequate to handle it and poor cooling properties. Needs to re-engineer a whole block.

1987, creates their own motor from scratch with same 4.40 bore centers as SBC, but with smaller bore and longer stroke, with an end displacement of 348 cubic inches. This is a completely new block.

1988, Mercruiser, builder of GM marine engines is chosen for the contract of building it, as they have tools for specially designed and built motors. From Mercruiser, they will be shipped to Bowling Green for installation in the Corvette.

1991, LT5 receives a bump in horsepower from machined inlet runners, blending the valve heads, and other minor work. Horsepower becomes 405.



A little known fact about the ZR1 is that further development of the program was already canceled by fall 1991 realizing they could make that kind of power with pushrods. Lotus advised Chevy that making simple revisions to the motor could yield 450-475 horsepower but they declined. The LT5 was already built out by 1993.
Old 04-01-2005, 05:56 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

So what they are saying is the LT5 was BEFORE the LT1 and not worth a damn anyway. An LT1 can make substantially more power for less money. The ONLY purpose an LT5 could have would be bling, but those of us knowledgable enough to know it was not worthwhile would not be impressed. Tim Allen paid GM a reported 6 figures to put one of these things into his b-body Impala SS several years ago, it required some firewall relocation as the story goes anyway.
Old 04-01-2005, 06:05 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
 
AAron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Monroe, SD
Posts: 2,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

it is like a cobra motor. done right it could spank a LT1/4 but that is every motor.

being an ME major i personally love the thought of a DOHC small block. they just need more R&D to make a better one. but for its day it was an engineering masterpeice.



Quick Reply: LT5?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 AM.