Valvetrain Components have arrived....
Changing cam selection again?!? Ok so I was all decided on a cam and chose the cc305 220/230 114.
I chose this cam because of emissions, they are tough here in az and i need something to pass as my ta is my daily driver.
Now that everything has arrived:
1.6 roller rockers NSA
Hardened Pushrods
Timing Chain
Gaskets
Studs
Guideplates
Msd Cap and rotor
Springs, locks, retainers
I am not sure if i want to stick with this cam because I have heard some vids and the lope was barely noticeable at all. I could sell it and get the same cam just with the 112 lsa to get a better lope, but then would that effect emissions?
Or i can just get a cc503 with a 114 lsa, or would that not pass emissions?
Let me know what you all think and hopefully I will make up my mind, thanks!
I chose this cam because of emissions, they are tough here in az and i need something to pass as my ta is my daily driver.
Now that everything has arrived:
1.6 roller rockers NSA
Hardened Pushrods
Timing Chain
Gaskets
Studs
Guideplates
Msd Cap and rotor
Springs, locks, retainers
I am not sure if i want to stick with this cam because I have heard some vids and the lope was barely noticeable at all. I could sell it and get the same cam just with the 112 lsa to get a better lope, but then would that effect emissions?
Or i can just get a cc503 with a 114 lsa, or would that not pass emissions?
Let me know what you all think and hopefully I will make up my mind, thanks!
Last edited by ReD95LT1; Jan 19, 2007 at 09:15 PM.
A spread LSA to improve emmissions or idle is a good way to not get what you could have out of a cam. If you think 112 is too wide too pass emmissions then pick a smaller cam.
I believe most guys with the 503 on a 112 do OK emissions wise though.
I believe most guys with the 503 on a 112 do OK emissions wise though.
