hooker or pacesetters long tubes?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 12, 2007 | 11:43 PM

#21

azvforce

On The Tree

iTrader: (-1)

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 159

Likes: 0

From: Phoenix AZ

Jet hots? A friend has those and they absolutely suck. His ground clearance is horrible and he is not even lowered. They were a huge pain in the *** to install as well.

My coated Pacesetters were cake to install, plug changes could not be easier, and the ground clearance is the best I could hope for with any LTs. I have had zero problems with them and would buy them again in a heartbeat.

Strange how people can have different luck with the same product.

Feb 13, 2007 | 12:04 AM

#22

streetwarrior96

TECH Fanatic

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 1,119

Likes: 0

Hookers cause they have been around for a long time....to bad black jack arent around any more

No problems with them or their ORY

Feb 13, 2007 | 12:23 AM

#23

lt1formula2000

TECH Regular

iTrader: (10)

Joined: Dec 2004

Posts: 479

Likes: 0

From: oklahoma

I had hooker on a previous car and had no problems with them easy install good fit headers tucked good to the floor pan. I have jet hots(hookers that have been coated and thicker flanges) on my current LT1 with a custom ORY and my ground clearence is awesome. Not saying pacesetters aren't good I just don't have any experience with them on LT1s. I have a set of them on my LS1 car and must they fit it great and there quality is above and beyond for the price.

Feb 13, 2007 | 10:22 AM

#24

97ssmokem

10 Second Club

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 148

Likes: 0

From: San Antonio

Quote:

Originally Posted by azvforce

I have had no issues with clearence. Can change my plugs a lot easier then stock and love the coated look. The pacesetters rusted and had constant leaks. But mine could have been made on a Friday at 5Pm..

Reply Subscribe