LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Cat delete with LM1 sucks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2007, 01:09 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LT1_King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hereford, Tx (near amarillo)
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Cat delete with LM1 sucks

hey guys i have a 94Z A4 with stock manifolds. i deleted the cat cause it wa clogged. i put a strait pipe in place of it and i have the LM1. performance wise it took ALOT of my power down and didn't even gain alot up top. the only reason i took off the cat was cause it was clogged. has anyone ever done this and if you have what are your opinions on it? i think its not worth any gain. it just hurt my performance. i don't like it. i think i'm gonna put a high flow cat for a while till i get my LT's.
Old 04-10-2007, 02:41 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
3pnt4maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

seems to me you lost your backpressure cause the lm is straight through
Old 04-10-2007, 03:03 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
LT1MAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,722
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i had mid length headers when i gutted my cat. i didn't put the straight pipe in tho i just left the shell of the cat, i felt like i picked up a few plus a few extra exhaust tones, but i definately did not LOSE power.
Old 04-10-2007, 03:10 PM
  #4  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LT1_King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hereford, Tx (near amarillo)
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LT1MAN
i had mid length headers when i gutted my cat. i didn't put the straight pipe in tho i just left the shell of the cat, i felt like i picked up a few plus a few extra exhaust tones, but i definately did not LOSE power.

see but i'm running stock manifolds. their flow really sucks. lol. yeah i understand with some headers you don't need a cat cause headers are WAY better flowing than manifolds.
Old 04-10-2007, 03:12 PM
  #5  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LT1_King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hereford, Tx (near amarillo)
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 3pnt4maro
seems to me you lost your backpressure cause the lm is straight through

yeah i think i lost ALOT of back pressure cause down low it just flat out sucks. i thought i was gonna gain alot up top but i didn't gain much. lol. i'll be putting a high flow pretty soon.
Old 04-10-2007, 04:22 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
sdm1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holland Twp/Milford, New Jersey
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

with the manifolds not flowing too well, you wouldn't lose power due to lack of backpressure. there's already significant amounts of backpressure through the manifolds. how do you know you lost a lot, down low? maybe you heard a different/maybe louder exhaust note and just EXPECTED more but didn't get anything...
Old 04-11-2007, 01:22 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
1bdbrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,933
Received 46 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 3pnt4maro
seems to me you lost your backpressure cause the lm is straight through
loss of back pressure should result in a gain in power over the entire rpm band. what he might have lost was exhaust scavaging. that will result in lower power. but going from a clogged cat to a straight pipe, unless its a smaller pipe,, i would imagine wouldnt cause that.
Old 04-11-2007, 01:34 PM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
 
LiENUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LT1_King
yeah i think i lost ALOT of back pressure cause down low it just flat out sucks. i thought i was gonna gain alot up top but i didn't gain much. lol. i'll be putting a high flow pretty soon.
I wasn't aware you were running a carbureted LT1, why'd you abandon the fuel injection? Who did the tuning of the carb and how much did the whole setup cost?
http://www.club240.com/forums/showpo...11&postcount=3
Old 04-11-2007, 03:51 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
3pnt4maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

but wouldnt a loss in backpressure cause a loss of torque down low which is why he thinks he lost power
Old 04-11-2007, 03:59 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
 
94CamaroZ28SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 94 z28 A4, I did a cut out and i gained 32 RWTQ but lossed 4 RWHP.

before Cut out and MOROSO CAI 268 RWHP & 303 RWTQ

After the Cut out and Moroso CAI 264 RWTQ & 335 RWTQ
Old 04-11-2007, 06:00 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
 
LiENUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 3pnt4maro
but wouldnt a loss in backpressure cause a loss of torque down low which is why he thinks he lost power
A loss of velocity would cause a loss of torque down low. A loss of backpressure will increase power throughout the rpm range of the engine, including down low. Read the link I linked to.
Old 04-11-2007, 08:58 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
 
UnitZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

if they were electric i would close them right after my tq rpm peak so you might get the hp up top back where you need it
Old 04-11-2007, 10:10 PM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
 
LiENUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UnitZ28
if they were electric i would close them right after my tq rpm peak so you might get the hp up top back where you need it
4rwhp is attributable to error, if you dyno the same car 3 times back to back not all 3 results will match.
Old 04-11-2007, 10:15 PM
  #14  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LT1_King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hereford, Tx (near amarillo)
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

see the cat wasn't completely clogged it was getting there. see it felt a whole lot stronger. it was a high flow cat that the previous owner had on there. the pipe that i put in place of the cat is a 3" pipe.
Old 04-11-2007, 10:19 PM
  #15  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LT1_King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hereford, Tx (near amarillo)
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the cat wasn't completely clogged but it was getting there. the pipe that i put in place of the cat is a 3" pipe. the throttle felt a whole lot different once i put the strait pipe through. see the way i noticed the difference was because me and my brother both have the same exact car with the same gearing. we would be side by side every time we would race. now he just beats me like nothing. that's why i noticed a big difference. see and when ever i gave it full throttle it didn't feel like it started pulling till about 2800 rpms.
Old 04-11-2007, 11:14 PM
  #16  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
Revelation Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rialto CA
Posts: 4,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

with a V8 backpressure is your enemy. with a 4 banger, you need that back pressure, but not that much of it.
Old 04-11-2007, 11:27 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
3pnt4maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ok well i was just saying..that was my understanding on it..not exactly a rocket scientist or nothing..thank for clarifying
Old 04-11-2007, 11:41 PM
  #18  
TECH Apprentice
 
LiENUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Revelation Z28
with a V8 backpressure is your enemy. with a 4 banger, you need that back pressure, but not that much of it.
back pressure is your enemy for both a V8 and a 4 banger. A v8 is just two 4 bangers joined together, dodge even produced a slant 4 that was nothing but a hemi v8 cut in two (not in any production vehicles). If back pressure was truly a good thing then we would have butterfly valves in our exhaust systems that are almost closed at low rpms and slowly open up as the rpms increase. The only systems which do do this do not use butterfly valves but rather use something to alter the effective diameter of the pipe or are only closed at certain cam events.



Quick Reply: Cat delete with LM1 sucks



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 PM.