LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Options for making a 400rwhp LT1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2007, 11:15 PM
  #21  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (18)
 
Stroker396@APF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lost Angels, CA
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had the same thought and went with the 58mm but i have a buddy who is running a 396 on a 52mm and making big numbers with LE2 heads and a cc306 and 1.6rr so it seams that is not the most restrictive point.
Old 05-06-2007, 11:16 PM
  #22  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
LT Malice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cherry Point NC
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sworaz
Yeah there is plenty of people at, over, or close to 400rwhp with Elliot Portworks products (LE) and they won't draing your bank account. cz28 has alot of support and info for this type of work.
I'd rather just buy your car than start modding another, but I don't have any cash until I sell my V6. Lets be honest, who wants to buy that!

I want a tried and true package that has worked for lots of people before me. I tried to be a pioneer with my v6, and while it is powerful, it requires too much maintenence. I want a car that i can run hard and put away wet.

BLACKSHARK-
I know exactly how you feel. Thats how my V6 is. I'm really trying to avoid that if I go the LT1 route. I want to just buy EVERYTHING I need all at once, install it, and be done.
Old 05-06-2007, 11:21 PM
  #23  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
cody161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bowling Green, ky
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

o yea i put a spec stage 3 in my car and for like the first 800 miles is sucked ***** but u just have to give them time to break in. yea it still chatters some but its a performance clutch what do u expect, i love the SPEC stage 3 clutch IMO
Old 05-06-2007, 11:21 PM
  #24  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (18)
 
Stroker396@APF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lost Angels, CA
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default



Unless you buy someones modded car all tuned perfect.
1. It will cost a pretty penny because as stated one mod requires another.
2. They never run the same as stock again
3. lose their reliablity

But a lot of fun along the way.
Old 05-06-2007, 11:48 PM
  #25  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (37)
 
Gun5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Tomball (H-Town), TX
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Stroker396
I had the same thought and went with the 58mm but i have a buddy who is running a 396 on a 52mm and making big numbers with LE2 heads and a cc306 and 1.6rr so it seams that is not the most restrictive point.
but is it RESTRICTIVE at all.. its only like $20 more for the 58 but i gotta do the hassle of the port job and such or i could just throw it on there but then it would have a "shelf" or whatever..
Old 05-06-2007, 11:53 PM
  #26  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (18)
 
Stroker396@APF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lost Angels, CA
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well of course it is restrictive, any intake you will have to port for either size TB (Duh right) You have to make sure that you have the right part for the application. Otherwise no one would have made a 52mm (the whole bigger isn't always better). As far as the port job for the TB that can be done yourself with a dremel and the right bit, easy job.
Old 05-07-2007, 12:35 AM
  #27  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
97blackz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stroker396
Well of course it is restrictive, any intake you will have to port for either size TB (Duh right)
the stock TB opening is 52mm, so no porting is required for the 52mm TB
Old 05-07-2007, 12:51 AM
  #28  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (18)
 
Stroker396@APF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lost Angels, CA
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My bad you are correct. I made the mistake of assuning that since the stock TB is 48mm that the opening was the same but it is not.
Old 05-07-2007, 12:51 AM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
 
streetwarrior96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Old 05-07-2007, 12:55 AM
  #30  
On The Tree
 
Cammed95Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Leander, TX
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Full bolt ons, decent sized heads cam combo. Not too hard if you do it right and don't cut corners.
Old 05-07-2007, 01:00 AM
  #31  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
infinitebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,280
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

I agree with the others that said to stay away from the edelbrock heads. Stay with ported stockers or if you want an aftermarket casting go with trickflows.
Old 05-07-2007, 01:03 AM
  #32  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (37)
 
Gun5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Tomball (H-Town), TX
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 97blackz28
the stock TB opening is 52mm, so no porting is required for the 52mm TB
that's why im leaning towards that.. i got all the tools todo the porting no prob just the hassle
Old 05-07-2007, 01:57 AM
  #33  
Banned
 
GGPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 93 vette and with the top end package I have it gave me 422.6whp. I went with afr 195cc heads with 2.05/1.6 valves(comp. pkg). Hydralic roller cam from comp. 232/240 .535/.545, hydralic roller lifters, 1.6rrs,shorty headers,52mm tb which flows close to 900cfm, slp exhaust and vortex ram air.I went with 32lb inj.Thats on 36 degrees advanced and a 13:1 a/f mixture. Afr is alot more hype then results? yeah,sure. I know AI does good work but come on. The hp chevy high performance magazine gets with all of the afr heads they use are amazing. The dyno numbers dont lie. AI may be the cheaper way to go, but when your talking about a project like this one, you dont cut corners.
Old 05-07-2007, 07:16 AM
  #34  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by V8sounds
No I am not on drugs. I was 99% sure I said ported heads up there, but I geuss I did not. I meant to say that the stock heads if ported, should get you very close.
Still ported heads and a HOT cam aint going to do it. The HOT cam is popular because it gets a lot of press, not because it is all that wonderful, it is fine but not great as most mistake it for.


GGPC, we don't race dynos and most of you are incapable of understanding the HUGE amount of power lost going from an engine dyno with all the tricks to RWHP numbers.

To get 400rwhp through an automatic a motor without accessories and withough intake and exhaust restriction will have to make about 520hp or so. For a magazine they will play games to inflate numbers beyond this level. Loose clearances, ice, spark and fuel set unsafe for actual in car use etc. Flat out magazines LIE to get advertizer dollars, simple as that.
Old 05-07-2007, 08:26 AM
  #35  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 3,970
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stroker396
I doubt you will hit 400 at the rear with stock heads I have a 3 angle job and some bowl blending and will dyno the 396 next week and I doubt it will be there because of them. I saw the LT4 cam specs and they are not all that big.
Ported stock heads and a good cam will make 400rwhp no problem. Sounds like your heads have minor work done... a full port is key.
Old 05-07-2007, 10:24 AM
  #36  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
97blackz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RealQuick
Ported stock heads and a good cam will make 400rwhp no problem. Sounds like your heads have minor work done... a full port is key.
i think he was talking about unported stock heads. a good set of stock ported heads will flow enough air for well over 400 rwhp with the right set up. the trick is setting everything up to run at it's peak in conjunction with all the other parts and not in conflict with everything else on the car. 400 rwhp is not exactly easy but it is very achievable if you do your homework and don't skimp or try to do it "cheap"

and i would have to agree a hotcam is not going to get you to 400rwhp even with ported heads, get a custom grind cam to work well with your heads and other mods as well and that will make it's power and torque where you want it.
Old 05-07-2007, 12:07 PM
  #37  
Banned
 
GGPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Still ported heads and a HOT cam aint going to do it. The HOT cam is popular because it gets a lot of press, not because it is all that wonderful, it is fine but not great as most mistake it for.


GGPC, we don't race dynos and most of you are incapable of understanding the HUGE amount of power lost going from an engine dyno with all the tricks to RWHP numbers.

To get 400rwhp through an automatic a motor without accessories and withough intake and exhaust restriction will have to make about 520hp or so. For a magazine they will play games to inflate numbers beyond this level. Loose clearances, ice, spark and fuel set unsafe for actual in car use etc. Flat out magazines LIE to get advertizer dollars, simple as that.
I run a A4 in my vette.With 3.73 gears and a 2800tc. Last time at the track with mts, I ran 11.83@117.3.Thats with a 3102lb vette. The parts and tune I used were right out of the mag. When I want to take a trip,I just switch chips.No big whoop. And most of you? I really like to know who your clumping me in with?
Old 05-07-2007, 05:43 PM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
 
streetwarrior96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GGPC
I run a A4 in my vette.With 3.73 gears and a 2800tc. Last time at the track with mts, I ran 11.83@117.3.Thats with a 3102lb vette. The parts and tune I used were right out of the mag. When I want to take a trip,I just switch chips.No big whoop. And most of you? I really like to know who your clumping me in with?
well for us f-body and b-body guys you got us by 500 lbs. 96capricemgr car weighs 4000 lbs and runs what you run. Remember sometimes HP don't mean much at the track. I've never seen and Hot cam setup hit 400 + at the wheels
Old 05-07-2007, 10:33 PM
  #39  
Banned
 
GGPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With that trap speed I should be in the mid 11's but I fell asleep at the tree. I just cant launch worth a ****. I'll admit it.
Old 05-07-2007, 11:30 PM
  #40  
TECH Regular
 
roadhog_113's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, Mb
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I got 415rwhp on a 93 z28 and here is a list of my engine mods. Thought you might want some input that is actually backed up.
NUTEK/Jason Short heads
Port matched, ported 58mm TB holes, and painted Intake manifold
Holley 58mm TB
Lucas 38lb Injectors
Walbro 255lph fuel pump
BLUECAT tune
Moroso CAI
MSD coil
Accel wires
NGK TR-6 plugs
MSD digital 6A ignition
MSD 2 stage timing controller
Comp Cams cc306 camshaft
Comp Hi-Tec chrome-moly pushrods
Comp roller lifters
Comp Pro-Magnum 1.6 NSA roller rockers
Combination Motorsports dual valve springs
Chrome-moly retainers
Comp 10* locks and locators
Comp rocker studs
GMPP guideplates
Meziere electric water pump
Pacesetter ceramic-coated longtube headers


Quick Reply: Options for making a 400rwhp LT1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.