Problem with Dyno Jet
TECH Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ThoR294
as far as the car running, the map does nothing. Its not a primary sensor on fuel delivery
The following tables use the map sensor
Main Spark Advance vs rpm vs map
Extended spark advance vs rpm vs map
Spark Correction vs map vs coolant temp
max knock retard vs map (not in pe)
Low octane knock retard multiplier vs map
Open loop AFR vs coolant temp vs MAP
BLM Cell MAP boundaries
And this list is nowhere near complete
not to mention the EGR stuff, DFCO stuff several WOT related things (can only go WOT over a certain map value).
Just because you don't understand why its there doesnt mean its there for nothing
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0
Brett Foote
10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever
Verdad Gallardo
Originally Posted by ThoR294
bank is garbage. sequential gets the fuel there when its needed. not like 5 years before. and MAF actually measures the air coming in, unlike speed density which assumes air is coming in
Enjoy your 13 second godly 96, I'll be waving from my 93
Originally Posted by ThoR294
lol sure just put back your 350
Back on topic, once again - if anything his car is strong for its mods. The M6 guys insulting can enjoy their dyno numbers while he enjoys his timeslips, and then we can all be happy old LT1 guys
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 4
From: Ringoes/Flemington, New Jersey
you guys are ******* retarded. Im just saying sequential injection and MAF has better more efficent readings than SD.
pull your head out of your ***.
my 88 f150 is SD. thing runs fine.
nice 1/8th of a mile... whoop-deee dooo. I guess it really runs shitty so it wouldnt make it down the whole drag. lawl
pull your head out of your ***.
my 88 f150 is SD. thing runs fine.
nice 1/8th of a mile... whoop-deee dooo. I guess it really runs shitty so it wouldnt make it down the whole drag. lawl
Originally Posted by ThoR294
you guys are ******* retarded. Im just saying sequential injection and MAF has better more efficent readings than SD.
pull your head out of your ***.
pull your head out of your ***.
.
Originally Posted by ThoR294
nice 1/8th of a mile... whoop-deee dooo. I guess it really runs shitty so it wouldnt make it down the whole drag. lawl
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 4
From: Ringoes/Flemington, New Jersey
Originally Posted by Puck
. At least you managed to install your Strut Bar without blowing up your engine. Paired with that Sequential Injection you must be 10s now .
.You just come in randomly and start ****. Did i say sequential made like 30000 more HP? no, i just said overall its better.
once again,
btw, im sure his car made it down the quarter, but no one gives a **** about the 1/8th of a mile time.
Originally Posted by ThoR294
thats right, i know nothing about LT1s, thats why ive helped plenty of people fix their cars.
You just come in randomly and start ****. Did i say sequential made like 30000 more HP? no, i just said overall its better.
once again,
btw, im sure his car made it down the quarter, but no one gives a **** about the 1/8th of a mile time.
You just come in randomly and start ****. Did i say sequential made like 30000 more HP? no, i just said overall its better.
once again,
btw, im sure his car made it down the quarter, but no one gives a **** about the 1/8th of a mile time.
Originally Posted by ThoR294
bank is garbage. sequential gets the fuel there when its needed. not like 5 years before. and MAF actually measures the air coming in, unlike speed density which assumes air is coming in
Originally Posted by ThoR294
94 > 93. as far as years go. 
93 was speed density (ew), bank injection (double ew), i believe a non-electronic controlled a4 as well.. and higher gearing in the rear?
93 was speed density (ew), bank injection (double ew), i believe a non-electronic controlled a4 as well.. and higher gearing in the rear?
Originally Posted by ThoR294
im just talking in general. id rather have MAF and seq than bank and sd.
93s are like the redheaded stepchild of the 4th gens IMO.
93s are like the redheaded stepchild of the 4th gens IMO.
Originally Posted by ThoR294
well, look at the name... its a MUSTANG dyno...
Originally Posted by ThoR294
the map is there for DIAGNOSTIC PURPOSES. it lets you read manifold vaccum on a scan tool... mmkayyy
why did GM go from a 350 to a 305? MAF > SD
Originally Posted by ThoR294
as far as the car running, the map does nothing. Its not a primary sensor on fuel delivery
Originally Posted by ThoR294
i dont ever plan on dynoing my car... ill just take it to the strip
Sorry, I dont know what he would have done without you
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 4
From: Ringoes/Flemington, New Jersey
notice IMO means OPINION. i THINK the 93s were the redheaded stepchild cause they had no vented opti, believe they had the airpump in a diff spot as well, id have to look at my dads 93 t/a.
Like i said, this thread was fine till you started ****. so just leave the thread kthnx.
and hence, SARCASM on the mustang dyno. (the face unless youre too ******* dense)
Like i said, this thread was fine till you started ****. so just leave the thread kthnx.
and hence, SARCASM on the mustang dyno. (the
face unless youre too ******* dense) 
Originally Posted by Puck
If sequential and MAF is so much "better", and a godsend over us poor 93 guys, then why do many of the big power guys switch to old school MAFless SD tunes, and why is batch fire is used at WOT? Maybe because, powerwise, they dont mean dick? You have already shown your knowledge of LT1s - almost none. At least you managed to install your Strut Bar without blowing up your engine. Paired with that Sequential Injection you must be 10s now .
Thank you for proving my point once again.
.Thank you for proving my point once again.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 4
From: Ringoes/Flemington, New Jersey
Originally Posted by kinglt-1
People go to speed density because they outflow the maf above 4000 rpm. the map can only read so much air. maf is more efficient that is why its better. no power advantage. why spend 300-400 hundred dollars on a new maf when you can tune speed density. I would onlu go sd if you were over 500 whp. other than that the maf rules....
Oh I also would never own a 93, just like I would never own a 97 gtp/regal. The first production model year of any vehicle is never the best. They always have oddball **** that is addressed/fixed in later years.. My opinion is based on a daily driver/ mild street car. If its for drag purpose then who gives a **** your just beating the **** out of it anyways.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 4
From: Ringoes/Flemington, New Jersey
yeah. I was told also to stay away from the 98 LS1s. they fixed things in the later years of the LS1s. i forget exactly what tho. think it was something with the intake